|
|
|
| ![]() Website Color Key |
Tommy Ice: Ezekiel 38 & 39 "As I have thought more critically about literal interpretation and this passage while doing this series, I have come to disagree with a statement made by Mark Hitchcock and I where we said: "Ezekiel spoke in language that the people of his day could understand. If he had spoken of MIG-29s, laser-fired missiles, tanks, and assault rifles, this text would have been nonsensical to everyone until the twentieth century."[10] Instead, I have come to agree with DeMar who says: "A lot has to be read into the Bible in order to make Ezekiel 38 and 39 fit modern-day military realities that include jet planes, 'missiles,' and 'atomic and explosive' weaponry."[11] Even though I think DeMar is right on this one point, it does not mean that his conclusion is correct."
|
Scholars Weigh My Research By Dave MacPherson Dave MacPherson Study Archive | The Real Manuel Lacunza | Deceiving and Being Deceived | Thomas Ice - Hired Gun | Scholars Weigh My Research | Margaret MacDonald's Originial Pretribulational Vision | Pre-Trib Rapture Die-hards | Revisers of Pre-Trib Rapture History Just sent you my latest which I hope you will be led to air inasmuch as it's also a defense of your great site since you have already been airing my findings. Lord bless. - Dave MacPherson
For more than 30 years my pretrib critics have falsely claimed that leading scholars condemn my research. Since those critics are in effect slamming poor, helpless, long-departed
Margaret Macdonald, I hereby come to her defense with a few of the many reactions from scholars who generally haven't had a huge axe to grind either for or against the pretrib rapture view. My usual practice, by the way, has been to obtain permission when quoting personal letters. Superficial scholarship is aware that the first----1973----printing of Gundry's THE CHURCH AND THE TRIBULATION stated on pp. 185, 187: "The likelihood is that Edward Irving was the first to suggest the pretribulational rapture....the outpouring on Margaret Macdonald did not include revelation of a pretribulational rapture...." But careful scholarship has long known that after Gundry saw my Macdonald findings, he deleted his Irving statement and substituted favorable comments about the Scottish lassie----changes appearing in his classic work since the 1980's! Reformed Review: "MacPherson has done excellent historical research." (Spring, 1985) The Seminary Review: "[MacPherson] shows conclusively that Margaret Macdonald was the originator of the concept." (June, 1984) Oswald J. Smith (pastor, author): "You have some excellent thoughts here that will be difficult to answer." Send an email with your comments to todd @ preteristarchive.com Be sure to include the article name. They will be posted shortly upon receipt
CommentsDear Brethren: Just as we waded through the maze to arrive at Realized Eschatology after being brainwashed in dispensational seminaries, so too we must ever labor to validate our position. There is much misinformation among PP, HP, et. al. Bob usmc1div@earthlink.net If Jesus fulfilled the First Covenant that he may establish the New Covenant...live with it!
CommentsPerhaps I am confused, for in my own personal library I have a copy of a book written by Lacunza, that taught a pre-trib rapture before Margaret Macdonald expressed the idea. Moreover, this book was translated by Darby. Please do not misunderstand me, I do not support the rapture, nor do I support the idea that Macdonald was the first one to teach it. Blessings! RW Deese
CommentsI was Pre-Trib but I have left that view. Have many problems with those who take up for that view. Great Web Site. Keep up the good work. Dan
CommentsWhat difference does it make as to who received what from who? The Word of God by itself is clear enough. I appreciate Mr. MacPherson's books. They have helped me realize that the post trib theory is indeed full of holes, and these folks do have an agenda. Thanks! Steve Klassen
CommentsBe sure of one thing....JUDGEMENT is coming!!!
CommentsHow might I e-mail Dave MacPherson? I am a post-trib researcher, and would like to send him a historic document related to Darby.
CommentsTo whom it may concern: I'm intrigued by your research on the matter. I would love to know your resources for your facts placed in your book, for I've not had the opportunity to read it yet. Phillip Date: 19 Apr 2005 Date: 22 Jan 2006 |
Email PreteristArchive.com's Sole Developer and Curator, Todd Dennis
(todd @ preteristarchive.com)
Opened in 1996 |