Online Bible and Study Tools
Translate || Vine / Schaff || Alts/Vars/Criticism/Aramaic


End Times Chart

Introduction and Key


Church-State Relations and the Book of Revelation
An Introduction to The Parousia: A Careful Look at the New Testament Doctrine of the Lord's Second Coming
by James Stuart Russell (1878) // Written by
Todd Dennis, Curator

Doomsday Dementia

Study Archive

Click For Site Updates Page

Free Online Books Page

Historical Preterism Main

Modern Preterism Main

Hyper Preterism Main

Preterist Idealism Main

Critical Article Archive Main

Church History's Preteristic Presupposition

Study Archive Main

Dispensationalist dEmEnTiA  Main

Josephus' Wars of the Jews Main

Online Study Bible Main

Review of: The Rapture Plot

By Ovid Need, Jr.

     There are many books on the market that do excellent jobs tracing the history of what has been called, "Fundamentalism," as propagated by Brethren teachers such as H.A. Ironside, W.E. Vine and C.H. Mackintosh--Loizeaux Brothers could be considered the "official" publishers of Brethren material, and popularized by men such as D.L. Moody and C.I. Scofield.

     In an extremely well documented book, The Rapture Plot, Dave MacPherson, by researching the original British documents, traces the origin of modern millenarianism--which centers around teaching of a "secret rapture of the saints," a "church/Israel `distinction,'" and a "literal rather than figurative or spiritualized fulfillments" of prophecy. [Plot, 198, Roots, 13. We have provided some other facts and sources that also document what MacPherson is presenting, filling in some blank places. Publishers of other books available upon request: e mail is easiest.] MacPherson shows that the ideas did not originate with the Brethren though the Brethren tried desperately--plotted--to cover up the source and credit Darby with the new ideas, hence, "The Rapture Plot." After all, how many men are willing to admit they are following a woman's teaching given while she was in a trance? [Plot, 93.]

     As early as 1825, Edward Irving was "declaring that the `first- -fruits' are `gathered before the harvest which immediately precedeth (sic) the treading of the wine-press of wrath.'" "[T]he Irvingites clearly taught pretrib as early as September 1830." [Plot, 199, 151.] The reader might be interested to know that after Irving was locked out of his Presbyterian Church in 1832 where tongues and "supernatural" healings first occurred, he founded the Catholic Apostolic Church with "Drummond, Cardale, Taplin, and about eight hundred others..."[Who Was Who, 211.] Irving was an extremely popular British speaker: As he traveled the land, his prophetic views drew great crowds. Darby did not come out of the Church of England until at the very earliest 1827 (but more like 1830), and Irving was already teaching the basic doctrine latter claimed by Darby. "[E]arlier 19th century writers had uniformly agreed that pretrib was Irvingism's important contribution and hallmark..." William Kelly (1820-1906), with Darby's permission, "edited"-- actually, revised--Darby's works to make them read as though the millenarian ideas were new with Darby:

     1. The Irvingites publicly taught a pretribulation rapture long before Darby did.

     "2. The underlying "truths" (such as the church/Israel "dichotomy") that supposedly led Darby to pretrib were taught earlier by others, one of whom was led to pretrib by these "truths." The same "truths" were used for support only after pretrib was established. The Irvingites were led to pretrib by Old Testament and New Testament symbols including the Jewish feasts, the two witnesses, and the man child -- symbols adopted by Darby latter on.

     "3. If Darby had been the first to clearly teach pretrib or "truths" leading to it, he would have had no need to overstate his earliest development when reminiscing in later years. Later 19th century scholars, aware that Irvingism never needed later reminiscences to "clarify" its own early development, uniformly credited the Irvingites with dispensationalism's chief features including the pretrib rapture.

     "4. Twentieth century Darby defenders, evidently dissatisfied with Darby's attempts to embellish and exaggerate his own earliest words, have overstated even what he overstated."[Plot, 136.]

     MacPherson reveals "William Kelly's "plot," his masterpiece of deception," viz., Kelly edited Darby's works to "prove" Darby actually originated pretrib theories. [Ibid, 155ff.] Thus when one quotes Darby, he knows not how much is Kelly_s added and/or changed words and how much is Darby_s original words. Writing in 1902, Robert Cameron was dogmatic in saying that from Polycarp to Irving there was not a hint of Irvingite, i.e., pretrib, doctrine, and that it "is distinctively a doctrine of the `Brethren'..." [Plot, 161, 156, 173, 172.] Cameron used Robert Baxter_s 1833 book in which Baxter claimed the Irvingite pre-trib rapture doctrine was "a work of Satan," [Ibid, 174. Letters, I.397, 406.] McPherson lists many men who firmly held that pretrib originated with Irving, not with Darby nor the Brethren, e.g. Robert Baxter (1833), S.P. Tregells (1855), Robert Norton (1861), Thomas Croskey (1872), William Reid (1880), &c. Brethren writers, especially Darby, edited existing writings of past saints--even the Reformers- -and hymns to support their theories.[Plot, 145, 146. Letters, I.413; III.45.] Moreover, Darby changed meanings of words, passages of Scripture and even the Scripture itself--he issued new translations in several languages, French, German, English, &c.--to support his prophetic understandings. [Letters, I.55, 380, 382, 402--he convinced US Christians that the OT is not for today, 534; II.32, 48, 65, 420, and other passages too numerous to mention.]

     For example, Darby defined "sovereign grace" as a God given ability to remain heavenly minded, detached from earthly things. [Writings, II.381, 425.] Darby readily admitted that his doctrine of withdrawal and soon coming of Christ changed multitudes of Scriptures. Thus he studied, translated and taught all Scripture in light of the new doctrines he propagated around the world. The new "Bible Reading" method of study developed by the Brethren, and popularized in America by D.L. Moody, permitted Scripture to be "studied" apart from its context. His new doctrines changed the traditional understanding of multitudes of Scriptures as he intentionally went against the orthodox Christian doctrine of his day. [Ibid, II.493, 494.] Among other things, he boasted that his unique prophet views changed the entire book of Psalms. [Letters, I.243ff.; II.561.] Irving_s new ideas were presented and developed at prophecy conferences which took place first at Albury Park, 1826--repeated 1827 and 1828, and latter at Powerscourt, 1831--repeated 1832 and 1833. [Roots, 18-41.] Observe:

     "... It was at Powerscourt that the teaching of a pretribulation rapture of the Church took shape. Tregelles, a member of the Brethren in these early days, tells us that the idea of a secret rapture at a secret coming of Christ had its origin in an "utterance" in Edward Irving's church, and that this was taken to be the voice of the Spirit. Tregelles says, "It was from that supposed revelation that the modern doctrine and the modern phraseology respecting it arose. It came not from Holy Scripture, but from that which falsely pretended to be the Spirit of God." This doctrine together with other important modifications of the traditional futuristic view were vigorously promoted by Darby, and they have been popularized by the writings of William Kelly." [Hope, 40, 41. Ladd footnotes his quote from Tregelles, "S.P. Tregelles, The Hope of Christ's Second Coming, first published in 1864, and now available at Ambassadors for Christ, Los Angeles, California."]

     "... Set in impiety, the doctrine of the Lord's secret Coming, before the manifestation of the Man of Sin and before the Great Tribulation, was then first openly promulgated in England. It was adopted by the late J.N. Darby, and was caught up far and near, and hailed as enchanted teaching." ["E.P. Cachemaille, The Prophetic Outlook To-day (London: Morgan & Scott, 1918), pp. 19, 20." Quoted by MacPherson, Plot, 189.]

     Though Irving "discovered" and developed the basic, modern millenarian ideas, the Irvingites were not the ones to spread them to the four corners of the earth: That was accomplished by the Brethren--extremely forceful, intelligent, talented and energetic young men such as J.N. Darby. Despite opposition from already established churches, Darby's ideas--gleaned from others and developed into his own unique system--overwhelmed the church at large around the world. [Plot, 109.] Pretrib has become to many the shibboleth that separates, and the essentials of the faith, e.g., the five Vs, have fallen into the realm of the unimportant. The reason, according to MacPherson, for the extreme antagonism toward those who do not hold to pretrib is "its tremendous fund-raising potential." [Ibid, 223.] MacPherson concludes:

     "The real test is ahead. If pretrib promoters ignore or twist this book's documentation, and if their only bottom line is a continuing flow of funds, then I won't be surprised if God views them collectively as an "Achan" (Josh. 7) and allows a national or even international money collapse!

     "I'm not expressing any particular end-time view by saying this. I'm only stating the principle Jesus gave when He said that we can't put money on an equal level with serving God..."

     The spirit of William Kelly lives on to defend the "Plot!"

     Appendix A, following the above quote, alone makes the book worth the money: MacPherson documents many "copying errors" made by those defending the pretrib rapture's originator as Darby rather the Scottish lass who bordered on the cultic, Margaret McDonald. Some of the errors seriously misrepresent and/or change facts: gross errors from men such as Tim Lahay, R.A. Huebner, John Walvoord, Charles Ryrie, John L. Bray, Hal Lindsey, Thomas Ice, Gerard Stanton and others. McPherson, documenting the "errors," shows how these men many times leave their readers believing things completely opposite of what the their quoted sources said and meant. One wonders how much money has been raised by telling folks, "The rapture might take place tonight, so give your money now: Don't leave it for the devil's crowd to spend." The love of money has led to some mighty strange doctrine.

     [The Rapture Plot, by Dave MacPherson, Millennium III Publishers, Simpsonville, South Carolina, 1995. It can be ordered from: Central Christian Bookstore, 3131 S Archer Ave, Chicago, IL, 60608--$14.95. Many of the documents referred to by MacPherson are originals found only in Britain. Note that we are not refering to Chilasm; we will develop that doctrine at a latter time.]

Pastor Need

[Permission to re-post given from The Biblical Examiner]

What do YOU think ?

Submit Your Comments For Posting Here
Comment Box Disabled For Security

Date: 14 Sep 2006
Time: 19:43:19


The pretribulation rapture is a scheme of Satan. There are other heresies which the devil offers. But the pretribulation rapture is, unfortunately, one of the most widely-believed lies of Satan. Perhaps one of the only more Satan-inspired heresies is the Filioque, the double procession of the Holy Spirit "from the Son" (Filioque), as well as from the Father. The Bible says the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father; period (John 15:26). Anyway, avoid Satan's trap and do not pay any attention to pre tribulation rapture talk and teachings.
Scott R. Harrington
Erie PA

Date: 03 Mar 2010
Time: 11:45:45

Your Comments:

[I recently spied this item on the web - Robyn]


by Dave MacPherson

The word "secrecy" when applied to Christ's return can refer to two different things: time and visibility. Before 1830 the only coming Christians looked for was the "every eye shall see him" second advent to earth - secret only in point of time.
Enter Margaret Macdonald in 1830. She saw "the one taken and the other left" before "THE WICKED" [Antichrist] will "be revealed" - and added that her pretrib rapture would not be "seen by the natural eye" but only by "those who have the light of God within." Her rapture was doubly secret: at an unknown day and hour and also invisible to "outsiders."
Desperate to eliminate Margaret as the pretrib originator and the Irvingites as the first public teachers of pretrib, Darby defender Thomas Ice foolishly claims that they taught a secret POSTTRIB coming even though he knows that when Hal Lindsey teaches "one taken" etc. before the Antichrist "is revealed" Lindsey is expressing the kernel of the pretrib view - what MM and the Irvingites clearly taught before Darby did! Google "X-Raying Margaret" and "Edward Irving is Unnerving" to see why they are properly labeled "pretrib.")
As early as June 1832, Irving's journal taught that only "to those who are watching and praying...will Christ be the morning star. To the rest of the church, and to the world, this first appearance will be...unintelligible." ("Present State of Prophetic Knowledge" etc., p. 374)
Always trailing and "borrowing" quietly from the Irvingites who in turn had "borrowed" from Margaret, Darby in 1845 finally sounded like them when he wrote that "the bright and morning the sweet and blessed sign to them that watch...And such is Christ before He appears [at the final advent to earth]. The Sun will arise on the world....The star is before the [Sun], the joy of those who watch. The unwakeful world, who sleep in the night, see it not." ("Thoughts on the Apocalypse," p. 167)
And Lindsey's "Late Great Planet Earth," p. 143, says that "the second coming is said to be visible to the whole earth (Revelation 1:7). However, in the Rapture. only the Christians see Him - it's a mystery, a secret."
My bestselling book "The Rapture Plot" (available at online stores including Armageddon Books) has 300 pages of such documentation and proves that Margaret was the first to "see" a secret, pretrib rapture, that the Irvingites soon echoed her in their journal (which Darby admitted he avidly read), and that Darby was last on all of the crucial aspects of dispensationalism.
Shockingly, all of the earliest pretrib development rested solely on unclear OT and NT types and symbols and NOT on clear Biblical statements. Margaret's rapture was inspired by Rev. 11's "two witnesses." And her "secret visibility" rested on the "types" of Stephen, Paul, and John - all of whom saw or heard what others couldn't see or hear.
For 30 years Darby's pretrib basis was the rapture of Rev. 12's "man child" - actually his plagiarism of Irving's usage of this "pretrib" symbol eight years earlier!
As I said at the start, the "second advent to earth" is secret in point of time with its unknown "day and hour," as Christ stated. Pretribs assert that if Christ returns for the church after the tribulation, we could count down the days and figure out the actual date of His return - which would contradict Christ's words.
But pretribs deliberately ignore the fact that Christ said that the tribulation days will be shortened - and He didn't reveal the length of the shortening!
Our opponents also assume that the "watch" verses prove the "any-moment imminence" of Christ's return. But do they? II Peter 3:12 says we are to be "looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God" which all premills claim is at least 1000 years ahead of us and therefore hardly "imminent"! What's the difference between "watching for" and "looking for"?
Another gimmick has pretribs saying "Would you want Jesus to return at any moment and find out you're sinning?" But Jesus ALREADY knows all about us! And the Holy Spirit, who's also God, is ALREADY here (Rom. 8:27)!
You have just learned a few of the many secrets that the Secret Rapture Gang has hidden for a long time. Evidently they have forgotten Luke 12:2's warning that "there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed"!
PS - For the ultimate in uncovered secrets, see engines like Google and type in "Pretrib Rapture Dishonesty."
PPS - While evangelicals stay largely asleep while waiting for their 180-year-old rapture, the shmutzy-tongued subversives of the world (e.g., movie moguls at awards ceremonies) invent new ways to create and unite even more members of the FFA (Future Followers of the Antichrist). For insights Yahoo "backstabbing tirades by David Letterman (and Sandra Bernhard and Kathy Griffin)" in a short Letterman bit.


Date: 29 Jun 2010
Time: 21:43:47

Your Comments:

There needs to be more publishing that supports the truth of gods word.the world is full false doctrine.The rapture being chief among these deceptions.This false doctrine has taken over the entire south of the U.S where I live.please people read your bibles pref.(KJV),and don't go for mans word without checking him you wan't to be decieved.I didn't think so! Thanks scott from arkansas.Date 6/29/10



Click For Index Page

Free Online Books Historical Preterism Modern Preterism Study Archive Critical Articles Dispensationalist dEmEnTiA  Main Josephus Church History Hyper Preterism Main

Email's Sole Developer and Curator, Todd Dennis  (todd @ Opened in 1996