|
John
Henten
Johanne Hentenio / Iohannes Hentenius
(1499-1566)
Descrizione fisica: [24], 284 c.
Nota: Segn.: fiore-3fiore8 a-z8 A-M8 N4
Lingua: Latino
Paese: FR
Impronta: lam, ina- umui ruer (3) 1547 (A)
Enarrationes vetustissimorum theologorum, in Acta quidem
apostolorum & in omnes D. Pauli ac Catholicas Epistolas ab Oecumenio: in
Apocalypsim vero, ab Aretha Caesarae Cappadociae episcopo magna cura
collectae. Iohanne Hentenio interpreta Pubblicazione:
Parisii : apud Mathurinum Dupuys, 1547 ; via Iacobea sub insigni hominis
Syluestris & Frobenii
Commentaria luculentissima vetustissimorum graecorum
theologorum in omnes D. Pauli epistolas ab Oecumenio /xacte & magna cura ad
compendium collecta interprete vero Iohanne Hentenio Nechliniensi
Hieronymiano. - Parisiis : apud Iohannem Foucherium sub scuto Florentiae
..., 1547 (Parisiis : excudebat Iohannes David).
WHAT OTHERS HAVE SAID
Catholic Encyclopedia
"John Henten - Biblical exegete, born 1499 at Nalinnes Belgium; died 10
Oct., 1566, at Louvain. When quite young he took the vows of religion in the
Hieronymite Order in Spain, but left it about 1548 to enter the Dominican
Order at Louvain, where he had gained a name at the university for sound
scholarship. In 1550 he began to teach in the Dominican convent of that
city, in which he became regent of studies three years later. He was made
defender of the Faith and inquisitor in 1556. While prior of the Louvain
convent he was chosen by the theological faculty of the university to take
the place of John Hessel, Regius Professor of Sentences, who had been sent
by the king to the Council of Trent, and was teaching at the university in
1565. Quétif and Echard (Script. Ord. Prĉd., II, 195-6) say that he was
praised by the writers of his century, especially by William Seguier in "Laur.
Beig.", pt. I, 5 Dec., no. I, p. 57. His principal writings are:
(1) "Biblia Latina ad vetustissima exemplaria castigata" (Louvain, 1547, and
many times elsewhere);
(2) "Commentaria in quatuor Evangelia", consisting of commentaries by St.
John Chrysostom and other early writers collected by Euthymius Zigabenus and
interpreted by Henten (Louvain, 1544);
(3) "Enarrationes in Acta Apost. et in Apocalypsin" (Louvain, 1845, and
repeatedly elsewhere);
(4) the same work, together with commentaries on the Epistles, as "cumenii
commentaria in Acta Apost. etc." (Paris, 1631).
Moses Stuart
(On Origins of Praeterist View)
"Near the commencement of the seventeenth century (1614), the Spanish Jesuit Ludovicus ab Alcasar published his Vestigatio arcani Sensus in Apocalypsi, a performance distinguished by one remarkable feature, which was then new. He declared the Apocalypse to be a continous and connected work, making regular advancement from beginning to end, as parts of one general plan in the mind of the writer. In conformity with this he brought out a result which has been of great importance to succeeding commentators. Rev. v-vi, he thinks, applies to the Jewish enemies of the Christian Church; xi-xix to heathen Rome and carnal and worldly powers, xx-xxii to the final conquests to be made by the church, and also to its rest, and its ultimate glorification. This view of the contents of the book had been merely hinted at before, by Hentenius, in the Preface to his Latin version of Arethas, Par. 1547. 8vo; and by Salmeron in his Preludia in Apoc. But no one had ever developed this idea fully, and endeavoured to illustrate and enforce it, in such a way as Alcasar ... Although he puts the time of composing the Apocalypse down to the exile of John under Domitian, yet he still applies ch. v-xi to the Jews, and of course regards the book as partly embracing the past.
"'(Stuart, Moses, "Commentary on the Apocalypse", Allen, Morrill and Wardell, Andover, 1845, Volume 1, p. 464.)
What do YOU think ?
Submit Your Comments For Posting Here
..Will Be Spam
Filtered and Posted Shortly..
| 
