|
|
|
| ![]() Website Color Key |
Matthew 26:64 is NOT a "Preterist Time Indicator" Pointing to AD70 "In short, the usage of "Apo Arti" in Matthew 26:64 [Apo ("from" - Strongs 575) and Arti ("now on" - Strong's 737)] is highly suggestive of the themes that have been previously offered at this blog ; that is, a series of revelatory recognitions of the power and glory of Jesus Christ's dominance by friend and foe alike. Though the typically pret-friendly Weymouth translation would like to make Jesus say "later on, you will see.." this is not really honest. I would rather say that it was simply a mistake, but I find it impossible to believe that neither Richard Francis Weymouth ("If this belief ever obtains general acceptance the earlier date of the Apocalypse will also be regarded as fully established. For it will then be seen that the book describes beforehand events which took place in 70 A.D.") nor Earnest Hampden-Cook (co-editor and author of "The Christ Has Come") were aware of how important (ironically) a futurist spin on this passage is to uphold their Preterist assumptions. However, not only is there no sense of futurity in this very emphatic Greek phrase, but rather we see quite the opposite.
|
|
George B. Caird
The Gospel of St. Luke (1963) | Jesus and the Jewish Nation (1965) | The Language and Imagery of the Bible (1980) | New Testament Theology (1994) | Revelation of John (1966) (On
The Significance of A.D.70) (On Mark 13:5-37 and the "Son of Man") (On Mark 13:14-19) (On Revelation 6:16-17) (On The Significance of Gospel Events) "the disciples were not evangelistic preachers sent out to save individual souls for some unearthly paradise. They were couriers proclaiming a national emergency and conducting a referendum on a question of national survival." (New Testament Theology, 361) (On Symbolism/Allegory) "Our difficulties begin when we try to decide how far to take this picture language literally and how far to take it figuratively. When John echoes the Roman legend that the dead Nero was about to return, how literally does he mean it? Does he believe that Nero was not in fact dead, or that he would be resurrected, or that another paranoiac would come to fill his empty shoes? (Black's New Testament Commentaries, "A Commentary on the Revelation of St. John the Divine," 2nd edition. p. 7)." "Misleading to say that in Revelation the monster is Rome, and still more misleading to say that it is ruler worship. The monster is both an older and a newer phenomenon than Caesar, and the great city is more ancient and more modern than Rome" (Black's New Testament Commentaries, "A Commentary on the Revelation of St. John the Divine," 2nd edition, p. xii)." "John uses his allusions not as a code in which each symbol requires separate and exact translation, but rather for their evocative and emotive power. This is not photographic art. His aim is to set the echoes of memory and association ringing (Black's New Testament Commentaries, "A Commentary on the Revelation of St. John the Divine," 2nd edition, p. 26)." (Revelation: Book of Cosmic Symbols) WHAT OTHERS HAVE SAID (On Relations with the Roman Catholic Church) Send an email with your comments to todd @ preteristarchive.com Be sure to include the article name. They will be posted shortly upon receipt
Commentscaird 1994: 150
CommentsThe proposals for solving the riddle on the number of the beast (666) at Revelation l3:l8 are legion. Here is one more: NEBEKEDNESSER, that is, the Greek letters: Nu (50) + Eta (8) + Beta (2) + Kappa (20) + Eta (8) + Delta (4) + Nu (50) + Eta (8) + Sigma (200) + Sigma (200) + Eta (8) + Rho (l00) = 666. The variant numbers are: 606, 6l6, 646, 665, 747. For 606, BAEL MARDUK / My Lord Marduk; for 6l6, KAISAR THEOS / Lord God; for 646, AMIL MARDUK / Man Of Marduk; for 665, a transliterization of the Greek word for beast (therion) into Hebrew, namely, Tav (400) + Resh (200) + He (5) + Yod (l0) + Nun (50) = 665; for 747, APAOL MARDUK / Heir Of Marduk. My reasons for these solutions are: The Jewish House Of Jesus (See SEPTUAGINT, Ezra 2:36) was captive/exiled in 6th century b.c. Babylon; The Book of Daniel 4:l6 mentions that God gave Nebuchadnezzer the mind of a beast; The 2nd century b.c. apocryphal word titled JUDITH refers to Nebuchadnezzer as "Lord of the whole world," "Who is God except Nebuchadnezzer," "All nations shall call upon Nebuchadnezzer as God"; Midrash Rabbah Ecclesiastes mentions that the Roman emperor Trajan was "a descendant of Nebuchadnezzer"; The lst century a.d. New Testament letter titled First Peter at 5:l3 mentions: "Greetings from her who dwells in Babylon"; The spelling for Nebuchadnezzer in THE SEPTUAGINT dates from the 2nd century b.c. at the earliest while the Jewish House Of Jesus was in 6th century b.c. Babylon!! [Walter C. Cambra, A.A.,B.A.,B.A.,M.A.,(FRC)(MAFA)]
|
Email PreteristArchive.com's Sole Developer and Curator, Todd Dennis
(todd @ preteristarchive.com)
Opened in 1996 |