|

(Predictions Concerning The Romans)
Rev. xii. 3,4. There appeared another wonder in heaven, a great
dragon, heathen empire, with seven heads, successive forms of
government, and ten horns, provinces immediately subject to the
emperor, while many were under his viceregents, -- and at last formed
into ten kingdoms, and seven crowns on his heads, and his persecuting tail drew the third part of the start of heaven,
ministers and professed Christians, and did cast them to the ground,
and stood before the woman, Christian church, which was ready to
be delivered, to devour her child; true members, as soon as it
was born.
Rev. vi. 1, -- 17 When the Lamb had opened the first seal, the
first beast, like to a lion, representing Vespasian, from the
East, said, Come and see. And behold a white horse, representing Roman conquests over the Jews,
&c. and the spread of
the gospel ; and he that sat on it had a bow, and a crown was given
unto him ; and he went forth conquering and to conquer.
(Scripture Prophecies Fulfilled, p. 146)
"Under the seventh seal, commencing about A.D. 323, the empire, now
externally Christianized, enjoyed fifteen years of tolerable quietness."
(Scripture Prophecies Fulfilled, p. 150)
"They are likened to Barren Fig Trees : Amidst their fair,
flourishing, and wide-spread leaves of profession, how destitute of good
works, even when Jesus was among them! For forty years after his
death, his intercession procured the sparing of them, till by his
gospel, and lesser strokes, he had digged and durged about them.
But continuing barren, they were, by the axe of the Roman troops, cut
down, and quickly withered away under his curse." (Brief View of
the Figures ; and Explication of the Metaphors, contained in Scripture,
p. 311)
"They are represented as a Carcase
gathered to by the eagles :
Being separated from God, the life of their soul, and church ; having
apostatized from his quickening truths ; and being destitute of his
enlivening grace ; how overspread with loathsome and noisome corruption!
How detestable to God and his people! How surrounded, sought out,
murdered and ruined by the eagle-bannered Roman armies!" (Brief
View of the Figures, p. 313)
"The Roman empire is represented as a Dragon ; as an exceeding
Terrible beast, very different from others, having iron teeth and
brazen nails : treading down and devouring everything it found.
It is represented as a Beast with seven heads and ten horns."
(Brief View of the Figures, p. 326)
WHAT OTHERS HAVE SAID
Philip Schaff
BROWN, JOHN: The name of several Scotch ministers, the most
noteworthy being: 1. John Brown of Edinburgh: Scotch Burgher minister, eldest son of
Rev. John Brown of Whitburn (21 m. w.s.w. of Edinburgh), Linlithgowshire
(b. 1754; d. 1832), and grandson of John Brown of Haddington; b. at
Whitburn July 12, 1784; d. at Edinburgh Oct. 13, 1858. He studied at
Edinburgh and the divinity hall of the Burgher Church at Selkirk; was
licensed 1805 and ordained minister of the Burgher Church of Bigger,
Lanarkshire, 1806; became minister of the Rose Street Church, Edinburgh,
1822, and of the Broughton Place Church in the same city 1829; was
professor of exegetical theology to the United Associate Synod after
1834. He was strongly in favor of the separation of Church and State,
and in 1845 was tried (and acquitted) before the synod on a charge of
holding unsound views concerning the atonement. He was a fine orator and
a voluminous writer; the most prominent of his works are: Expository
Discourses on First Peter (3 vols., Edinburgh, 1848); Exposition
of the Discourses and Sayings of our Lord Jesus Christ (3 vols.,
1850); The Resurrection of Life, an exposition of
I Cor. xv. (1852); Expository Discourses on Galatians
(1853);
Analytical Exposition of the Epistle of Paul to the Romans (1857). He was the father of the well-known John Brown, M.D. (b. 1810;
d. 1882), author of Rab and his Friends (Edinburgh, 1859).
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
J. Cairns, Memoirs of John Brown, Edinburgh, 1861; DNB,
vii. 18-19.
2. John Brown of Haddington: Scotch
Burgher minister; b. at Carpow, near Abernethy (on the Frith of Tay, 6
m. s.e, of Perth), Perthshire, 1722; d. at Haddington (12 m. e. of
Edinburgh) June 19, 1787. He was poor and self-taught, but acquired no
small amount of learning; was a herd-boy, pedler, soldier, and
school-teacher; studied theology under Ebenezer Erskine and James Fisher
of Glasgow; was licensed in 1750, and in 1751 settled as pastor of the
Burgher branch of the Secession Church of Haddington, where he remained
till his death, declining a call as professor of divinity in Queen's
College, N. J. After 1768 he was professor of theology to the Associate
Synod. His yearly income from his church never exceeded 50, and his
professorship had no salary; nevertheless he brought up a large family,
gave freely in charity, and wrote books (which brought him no pecuniary
profit) not only popular but valuable. They include: Two Short
Catechisms Mutually Connected (Edinburgh, 1764); A Dictionary of
the Bible (2 vols., 1769; revised ed., 1868); The
Self-interpreting Bible (2 vols., 1778; often reprinted); and A
Compendious History of the Church of England and of the Protestant
Churches in Ireland and America (2 vols., Glasgow, 1784; new edition
by Thomas Brown, Edinburgh, 1823).
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Sketches of his life are prefixed to various editions of his works; the
best is that by his son, prefixed to his Select Remains, ed. his
Sons, J. and E. Brown, this edited by W. Brown, Edinburgh, 1856.
Consult also DNB, vii. 12-14.
"John Brown of Haddington" (1918)
This book of 320 pages covers the life of one of the most
important Scottish Presbyterian ministers of the eighteenth century,
John Brown of Haddington. He was born in 1722, and by the age of
thirteen he was an orphan, living in poverty. He became a herd-boy,
watching sheep to earn his living. However, he had a deep interest in
the things of God, and set out to educate himself in the original
languages of the Bible. He taught himself Greek, and then went to a book
shop to buy a Greek New Testament. The bookseller said he didn't think
Brown could read it, and some University professors who were in the shop
asked Brown about himself. "Then one of them, not unlikely Francis
Pringle, then Professor of Greek, asked the bookseller to bring a Greek
New Testament, and, throwing it down on the counter, said, 'Boy, if you
can read that book, you shall have it for nothing.' He took it up
eagerly, read a passage to the astonishment of those in the shop, and
marched out with his gift, so worthily won, in triumph" (pp. 34-35).
Brown was able to teach himself not only Greek, but Latin and Hebrew as
well. Some young men in the vicinity who were studying for the ministry
became jealous of this poor herd-boy who had little formal education but
was so advanced in the study of languages. Thus a rumour was spread that
John Brown had received his knowledge of the languages from Satan
himself! This rumour spread, and stuck with him for years to come,
causing him much anguish. (Interestingly, one of the fellows who helped
spread this slander was a licentiate who was found guilty of unworthy
conduct and deprived of his licence to preach about the same time that
Brown himself was licensed).
Brown subsequently became a pedlar, and then a soldier fighting against
"the Pretender," Prince Charles Stuart, who unsuccessfully tried to
achieve power with the support of Highland troops. Subsequent to that
brief war, Brown became a schoolmaster, and finally a divinity student
in the Secession church. After successful completion of his studies, he
was called to be a pastor in the town of Haddington. It was there that
he spent much of his time writing the books for which he became famous.
Among his better known works are The Self-Interpreting Bible, The
Christian Journal, A Dictionary of the Holy Bible, A General History of
the Christian Church, The Psalms of David in Metre (his notes on the
Psalms), The Absurdity and Perfidy of all Authoritative Toleration of
Gross Heresy, Blasphemy, Idolatry, and Popery in Britain (including his
defense of the continuing obligation of the Solemn League and Covenant),
and The Harmony of Scripture Prophecies.
Brown was a stalwart for many important points of Biblical truth in his
day, but his work is of more value today than ever before. Read this
book to be encouraged about how God can take a poor, uneducated farm
boy, and make him into one of the great spiritual leaders of his day.
|
BROWN, JOHN,
author of the "Self-Interpreting Bible," and many popular
religious works, was born in the year 1722 at Carpow, a
village in the parish of Abernethy and county of Perth.
His father, for the greatest part of his life, followed the
humble occupation of a weaver, and was entirely destitute of
the advantages of regular education, but, nevertheless,
seems to have been a man of superior intelligence and worth,
and even to have possessed some portion of that zeal in the
pursuit of knowledge, and that facility in acquiring it
without the ordinary helps, which his son so largely
inherited. In consequence of the circumstances of his
parents, John Brown was able to spend but a very limited
time at school in acquiring the elements of reading,
writing, and arithmetic. "One month," he has himself told
us, "without his parent’s allowance, he bestowed upon
Latin." His thirst for knowledge was intense, and excited
him even at this early period to extraordinary diligence in
all departments of study, but particularly to religious
culture. The strong direction of his mind from the beginning
to scholarship in general, and to that kind of it more
closely connected with divinity in particular, seems to have
early suggested to his mother the possibility of his one day
finding scope for the indulgence of his taste in the service
of the church, and made her often picture, in the visions of
maternal fondness, the day when she should, to use her own
homely expression, "see the crows flying over her bairn’s
kirk."
About the
eleventh year of his age he was deprived by death of his
father, and soon after of his mother, and was himself
reduced, by four successive attacks of fever, to a state
which made it probable that he was about speedily to join
his parents in the grave. But having recovered from this
illness, he had the good fortune to find a friend and
protector in John Ogilvie, a shepherd venerable for age, and
eminent for piety, who fed his flock among the neighbouring
mountains. This worthy individual was an elder of the parish
of Abernethy, yet, though a person of intelligence and
religion, was so destitute of education as to be unable even
to read—a circumstance which may appear strange to those
accustomed to hear of the universal diffusion of elementary
education among the Scottish peasantry, but which is to be
accounted for in this case, as in that of the elder Brown,
by the disordered state of all the social institutions in
Scotland previous to the close of the seventeenth century.
To supply his own deficiency, Ogilvie was glad to engage
young Brown to assist him in tending his flock, and read to
him during the intervals of comparative inaction and repose
which his occupation afforded. To screen themselves from the
storm and the heat, they built a little lodge among the
hills, and to this their mountain tabernacle (long
after pointed out under this name by the peasants) they
frequently repaired to celebrate their pastoral devotions.
Often "the wilderness and the solitary place were glad for
them, and the desert rejoiced even with joy and singing."
Ere long it
happened that Ogilvie retired from his occupation as a
shepherd, and settled in the town of Abernethy. In
consequence of this change, young Brown entered the service
of a neighbouring farmer, who maintained a more numerous
establishment than his former friend. This step he laments
as having been followed by much practical apostasy from God,
and showed itself in a sensible decline of religious
attainments, and a general lukewarmness in religious duty.
Still, however, during the season of backsliding which he
himself saw reason thus to deplore, his external character
was remarkably distinguished by many virtues, and especially
by the rare and truly Christian grace of meekness. In the
year 1733, four ministers of the Church of Scotland, among
whomi was Mr Moncrieff of Abernethy, declared a secession
from its judicatures, alleging as their reasons for taking
this step the following list of grievances; "The sufferance
of error without adequate censure; the infringement of the
rights of the Christian people in the choice and settlement
of ministers under the law of patronage; the neglect or
relaxation of discipline; the restraint of ministerial
freedom in opposing mal-administration, and the refusal of
the prevailing party to be reclaimed." To this body our
young shepherd early attached himself; and ventured to
conceive the idea of one day becoming a shepherd of souls in
that connection. He accordingly prosecuted his studies with
increasing ardour and diligence, and began to attain
considerable knowledge of Latin and Greek. These
acquisitions he made entirely without aid from others,
except that he was able occasionally to snatch an hour when
the flocks were folded at noon, in order to seek the
solution of such difficulties as his unaided efforts could
not master, from two neighbouring clergymen—the one Mr
Moncrieff of Abernethy, who has just been mentioned as one
of the founders of the Secession, and the other Mr Johnston
of Arngask, father of the late venerable Dr Johnston of
North-Leith; both of whom were very obliging and
communicative, and took great interest in promoting the
progress of the studious shepherd-boy. An anecdote has been
preserved of this part of his life and studies which
deserves to be mentioned. He had now acquired so much
knowledge of Greek as encouraged him to hope that he might
at length be prepared to reap the richest of all rewards
which classical learning could confer on him, the capacity
of reading, in the original tongue, the blessed New
Testament of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. Full of this
hope, he became anxious to possess a copy of the invaluable
volume. One night, accordingly, having folded his flocks in
safety, and his fellow-shepherd, whose sentiments towards
him were now those of friendship and veneration, having
undertaken to discharge his pastoral duties for the
succeeding day, he set out on a midnight-journey to St
Andrews, a distance of twenty-four miles. Having reached his
destination in the morning, he repaired straightway to the
nearest bookseller, and asked for a copy of the Greek New
Testament. The master of the shop, though, situated as he
was in a provincial Scottish University, he must have been
accustomed to hear such books inquired for by youths whose
appearance and habiliments were none of the most civilized,
was nevertheless somewhat astonished by such an application
from so unlikely a person, and was rather disposed to taunt
him with its presumption. Meanwhile a party of gentlemen,
said to have been professors in the university, entered the
shop, and having understood the matter, questioned the lad
about his employment and studies. After hearing his tale,
one of them desired the bookseller to bring the volume, who
accordingly produced it, and throwing it down upon time
table, "Boy," said he, "read that book, and you shall have
it for nothing." The offer was too good to be rejected, and
young Brown, having acquitted himself to the admiration of
his judges, carried off his cheaply-purchased Testament in
triumph, and, ere the evening arrived, was studying it in
the midst of his flock upon the hills of Abernethy.
His
extraordinary acquisitions about this time subjected him to
a suspicion, which was more generally entertained, than
would now appear credible, that he received a secret aid
from the enemy of man, upon the pledge of his own soul. It
was probably in consequence of the annoyance he
experienced on this account, that he abandoned the
occupation of a shepherd, and undertook that of pedlar or
travelling-merchant. This mode of life was once of much
greater importance and higher esteem in Scotland than at
present, when the facilities of communication between all
parts of the country and the greater seats of commerce have
been multiplied to such a degree, and was often pursued by
persons of great intelligence and respectability. Its
peculiar tendency to imbue the mind with a love of nature,
and form it to a knowledge of the world, have been finely
illustrated by a great poet of our day: nor is the Scottish
pedlar of the Excursion, though certainly somewhat too
metaphysical and liberal, in every respect the unnatural
character which it has been represented. It will not,
however, be considered very surprising when we say, that
young Brown did not shine in his new profession. During his
mercantile peregrinations, which lay chiefly in the interior
parts of Fife and Kinrosshire, he made it a rule to call at
no house of which the family had not the character of being
religious and given to reading. When he was received into
any such dwelling, his first care was to have all the books
it could furnish collected together, among which, if he did
but light upon a new one, with avidity he fell to the
literary feast, losing in the appetite of the soul, the
hunger of the body, and in the traffic of knowledge
forgetting the merchandise of pedlar’s wares. It is related,
and may well be believed, that the contents of his pack, on
his return to head quarters from one of his expeditions,
used to present a lively image of chaos, and that he was
very glad to express his obligations to any neat-handed
housewife who would take the arrangement of them upon
herself. Many a time and oft was he prudently reminded of
the propriety of attending more to his business, and not
wasting his time on what did not concern him—till his
monitors at last gave up the case in despair, and wisely
shaking their beads, pronounced him "good for nothing but to
be a scholar."
Soon after
the close of the Rebellion of 1745, during which period he
served as a volunteer in the regiment of militia raised by
the county of Fife, in behalf of the government, he resolved
to undertake the more dignified duties of schoolmaster. He
established himself in the year 1747 at Gairney Bridge, a
village in the neighbourhood of Kinross, and there laid the
foundation of a school which subsisted for a considerable
time, and, fifteen years after, was taught by another
individual whose name has also become favourably known to
the world—whose lot, however, was not like his
predecessor’s, to come to the grave "like a shock of corn
fully ripe," but to wither prematurely "in the morn and
liquid dew of youth,"—the tender and interesting young poet,
Michael Bruce. During Mr Brown’s incumbency, which lasted,
for two years, this school was remarkably successful, and
attracted scholars from a considerable distance. He
afterwards taught for a year and a half another school at
Spittal, in the congregation of Linton, under Mr James Mair.
The practical character of his talents, the accuracy of his
learning, the intimate experience which, as a self-taught
scholar, he must have had of elementary difficulties, and
the best mode of solving them, and the conscientiousness,
and assiduity which, always formed distinguishing features
of his character—must have peculiarly qualified him for the
discharge of his present duties. While active in
superintending the studies of others, he did not relax in
the prosecution of his own. On the contrary, his ardour
seems to have led him into imprudent extremes of exertion.
He would commit to memory fifteen chapters of the Bible as
an evening exercise after the labours of the day, and after
such killing efforts, allow himself but four hours of
repose. To this excess of exertion he was probably
stimulated by the near approach of the period to which he
had long looked forward with trembling hope—the day which
was to reward the toils and trials of his various youth, by
investing him with the solemn function of an ambassador of
Christ. During the vacations of his school, he was now
engaged in the regular study of philosophy and divinity
under the inspection of the Associate Synod, and the
superintendence of the Rev. Ebenezer Erskine, and James
Fisher, two of the original founders, and principal lights
of the Secession church. At length, in the year 1751, having
completed his preparatory course of study, and approved
himself on trial before the Associate Presbytery of
Edinburgh, he was licensed by that reverend body, at
Dalkeith, to preach the gospel in their society. He entered
upon the sacred work with deep impressions of its solemn
responsibilities. He has himself mentioned that his mind,
immediately previous to his receiving authority to preach,
was very vividly affected by that awful text in Isaiah vi.
9, 10, "He said, Go and tell this people, Hear ye indeed,
but understand not; see ye indeed, but perceive not; make
the heart of this people fat, and make their ears heavy, and
shut their eyes; lest they see with their eyes, and hear
with their ears, and understand with their hearts, and
convert and be healed." He had not been long a probationer,
when he received two nearly simultaneous calls to the
settled discharge of ministerial duty; one from the
congregation of Stow, a village in the shire of Edinburgh,
and the other from that of Haddington, the principal town in
the county of that name. The Presbytery of Edinburgh, within
whose bounds both congregations were included, and which had
therefore, according to the Presbyterian constitution, the
right of deciding between their competing claims, submitted
the matter to his own discretion. His choice was determined
to Haddington, partly by his feelings of sympathy with that
congregation for disappointments it had already experienced,
and partly by his modest estimate of his own qualifications,
to which he felt the smaller of the two charges more
suitable. Over this congregation therefore he was finally
ordained pastor in the month of June, 1751. It deserves to
be mentioned, however, that he continued regularly to visit
and examine the congregation of Stow until it was supplied
with a regular minister.
To the duties
of the sacred office he devoted himself with the most
zealous and laborious industry. The smallness of his
congregation enabled him at once to undertake the widest
range of ministerial duty, and to execute it with the
greatest minuteness and accuracy. Besides regularly
preaching four discourses every Sunday during the summer,
and three during winter in his own place of worship, and
occasionally in the country during the week, he visited all
his people annually in his pastoral capacity, and carried
them twice in the same period through a course of public
catechetical examinations. He was very assiduous in his
visits to the sick and the afflicted, and that not merely to
those of his own congregation, but to all, of every
denomination, who desired his services. The peculiar
characteristic of his manner of address on all these
occasions, public and private, was an intense solemnity and
earnestness, which extorted attention even from the scorner,
and was obviously the genuine expression of his own
overwhelming sense of the reality and importance of the
message. "His grave appearance," says a late English divine,
who had attended his ministry for some time, "his solemn,
weighty, and energetic manner of speaking, used to affect me
very much. Certainly his preaching was close, and his
address to the conscience pungent. Like his Lord and Master,
he spoke with authority and hallowed pathos, having tasted
the sweetness and felt the power of what he delivered." To
the same effect, the celebrated David Hume, having been led
to hear him preach on one occasion at North Berwick,
remarked, "That old man preaches as if Christ were at his
elbow." Except for his overawing seriousness, and
occasionally a melting sweetness in his voice, it does not
appear that his delivery was by any means attractive. "It
was my mercy," he says, with characteristic modesty, that
"the Lord, who had given me some other talents, withheld
from me a popular delivery, so that though my discourses
were not disrelished by the serious, so far as I heard, yet
they were not so agreeable to many hearts as those of my
brethren, which it was a pleasure to me to see possessed of
that talent which the Lord, to restrain my pride, had denied
to me." His labours were not in vain in the Lord. The
members of his congregation, the smallness of which he often
spoke of as a mercy, seem to have been enabled to walk, in a
great measure, suitably to their profession and their
privileges; and he had less experience than most ministers
of that bitterest of all trials attached to a conscientious
pastor’s situation—scandalous irregularities of practice
among those in regard to whom he can have no greater joy
than to see them walking in the truth. In ecclesiastical
policy, he was a staunch Presbyterian and Seceder in the
original sense of the term, as denoting an individual
separated, not from the constitution of the established
church, either as a church or as an establishment, but from
the policy and control of the predominant party in her
judicatures. At the unhappy division of the Secession church
in 1745, commonly known by the name of the Breach, on the
question of snaking refusal of the burgess oath a term of
communion, though personally doubtful of the propriety of a
Seceder’s swearing the oath in question, he attached himself
to that party, who, from declining peremptorily to pronounce
it unlawful, obtained the popular appellation of
Burghers,—justly considering that a difference of opinion on
this point was by no means of sufficient importance to break
the sacred bond of Christian fellowship. His public prayers
were liberal and catholic, and he always showed the
strongest affection for gospel ministers and true Christians
of every name. In an unpublished letter to a noble lady of
the episcopal communion, he expresses his hope "that it will
afford her a delightful satisfaction to observe how
extensive and important the agreement, and how small the
difference of religious sentiments, between a professedly
staunch Presbyterian and a truly conscientious Episcopalian,
if they both cordially believe the doctrine of God’s free
grace reigning to men’s eternal life, through the imputed
righteousness of Jesus Christ our Lord." He made a point of
regularly attending and acting in the church courts, though
he avoided taking any leading part in the management of
ecclesiastical business. The uniformity and universality of
his habits of personal devotion were remarkable. Of him it
might well be said, that he walked with God, and that in God
he, as it were to his own consciousness, lived, and moved,
and had his being. He had acquired a holy skill in deriving,
from every scene of nature, and every incident of life,
occasions of Christian thought, impulses of Christian
feeling, motives to Christian duty. His "Christian Journal"
seems to have been literally the picture of his daily course
and association of ideas, and the beautiful motto he has
prefixed to it, to have been the expression of his own
experience: "The ear that is ever attentive to God never
hears a voice that speaks not of Him; the soul, whose eye is
intent on him, never sees an atom in which she doth not
discern her Best Beloved." He could hold sweet communion
with his heavenly Father in the most terrible displays of
His majesty, not less than in the softer manifestations of
His benignity. One day, hearing a tremendous crash of
thunder, he smilingly exclaimed to those around,-"That is
the low whisper of my God." His seasons of prayer, stated
and special, secret and domestic, were frequent beyond the
rules of any prescribed routine. Often was he overheard, in
the nightly and the morning watches, conversing with his God
in prayer and praise, remembering his Maker upon his bed,
and having his song with him in the night. Amidst the
ordinary details of life, the devout aspirations of the
heart were continually breaking forth in ejaculations of
thanksgiving and holy desire: his conversation habitually
dwelt on heavenly things; or, if secular objects were
introduced, he would turn them with sanctifying ingenuity
into divine emblems and spiritual analogies. His whole mind
and life seemed impregnated with devotion, and all his days
formed, as it were, one Sabbath. The extent of his pecuniary
liberality was surprising. He considered it a binding duty
on every individual to devote at least the tenth part of his
revenue to pious uses; and out of an income which, during
the greater part of his life, amounted to only forty pounds
a year, and never exceeded fifty, and from which he had a
numerous family to support, he generally exceeded that
proportion. He distributed his benevolence with strict
attention to the Saviour’s command, "Let not thy left hand
know what thy right hand doeth."
He was aware
of the importance of conversation among the various means of
doing good, and, though he laments his own "sinful weakness
and unskilfulness in pushing religious discourse," he was
too conscientious to neglect the opportunities which
presented themselves of promoting, in this way, the glory of
God and the best interests of men. He made it a distinct
principle never to leave any company in which he might be
placed, without saying something which, by the blessing of
God, might promote their spiritual good. It is related,
that, having accidentally met Ferguson the poet walking in
Haddington church-yard, and being struck with his pensive
appearance, he modestly addressed him, and offered him
certain serious advices, which deeply affected him at the
time, and doubtless had their share in exciting and
promoting those terrible convictions which latterly
overwhelmed the poet’s mind, and in which it may perhaps be
hoped there was something better than "the sorrow that
worketh death." He knew, however, that there was a certain
discretion to be used in such cases, and a selection to be
made of the "mollia tempora fandi," the seasons when
words are "fitly spoken." Of this, the following anecdote is
an example:—Having occasion to cross the ferry between Leith
and Kinghorn, with a Highland gentleman as his
fellow-passenger, he was much grieved to hear his companion
frequently take the name of God in vain, but restrained
himself from taking any notice of it in the presence of the
rest of the company. On reaching land, however, observing
the same gentleman walking alone upon the beach, he stepped
up, and calmly reminded him of the offence he had been
guilty of, and the law of God which forbids and condemns it.
The gentleman received the reproof with expressions of
thanks, and declared his resolution to attend to it in
future. "But," added the choleric Celt, "had you spoken to
me so in the boat, I believe I should have run you through."
It will not
be supposed, that, after having given himself with such
ardour to study in circumstances of comparative
disadvantage, he neglected to avail himself of the more
favourable opportunities he now enjoyed of extending and
consolidating his knowledge. By a diligent improvement of
the morning hours, and a studious economy of time throughout
the day, he rarely spent fewer than twelve hours of the
twenty-four in his study. He possessed extraordinary
patience of the physical labour connected with hard study.
No degree of toil in the way of reading, or even of writing,
seemed to daunt or to fatigue him. Though he never enjoyed
the assistance of an amanuensis, he transcribed most of his
works several times with his own hand: and even without a
view to the press, he more than once undertook the same
fatigue for the convenience of private individuals. In this
way, at the request of the Countess of Huntingdon, he copied
out his System of Divinity, before its publication, for the
use of her Ladyship’s theological seminary in Wales. He had
remarkable facility in the acquisition of languages; and of
this species of knowledge, the key to every other, he
possessed an extraordinary amount. Besides the three
commonly called the learned tongues, he was acquainted with
Arabic, Syriac, Persic, and Ethiopic; and of the modern
languages, with the French, Spanish, Italian, Dutch, and
German. In the various departments of real as
distinguished from verbal knowledge, his reading was
very wide in range and various in subject. His favourite
pursuits were history and divinity; but every subject, which
more nearly or more remotely bore on the literature of his
profession, he considered worthy of his attention. He
afterwards saw reason to repent of the wideness of his aims
in this respect, and to regret "the precious time and
talents," to use his own words, "he had vainly squandered in
the mad attempt to become a universal scholar." His reading,
though thus extensive, was at the same time very exact and
accurate. In order to render it so, he in many cases adopted
the tedious and laborious method of compiling regular
abridgments of important and voluminous books. Among the
works he thus epitomized, were Judge Blackstone’s
Commentaries, and the Ancient Universal History.
In the month
of September 1753, about two years after his ordination, Mr.
Brown married Miss Janet Thomson, daughter of Mr. John
Thomson, merchant at Musselburgh. For eighteen years he
enjoyed in her a "help meet" for him in his Christian
course, and at the end of that period he surrendered her, as
he himself expresses it, "to her first and better Husband."
They had several children, of whom only two survived their
mother—John and Ebenezer, both of whom their father had the
satisfaction before his death of introducing as ministers
into the church of Christ, the former at Whitburn, and the
latter at Inverkeithing. Two years after the death of his
first wife, which took place in 1771, he was married a
second time to Miss Violet Crombie, daughter of Mr. William
Crombie, merchant, Stenton, East Lothian, who survived him
for more than thirty years, and by whom he left at his death
four sons and two daughters, of whom only the half are now
alive. In his domestic economy and discipline, Mr. Brown
laboured after a strict fidelity to his ordination vow, by
which he promised to rule well in his own house. His notions
in regard to the authority of a husband and a father were
very high, and all the power which as such he thought
himself to possess, was faithfully employed in maintaining
both the form and the power of godliness.
In the year
1758, Mr. Brown, for the first time, appeared as an author.
His first publication was entitled "An Help for the
Ignorant, being an Essay towards an Easy Explication of the
Westminster Confession of Faith, and Catechisms, compiled
for the use of the young ones of his own congregation." In
addition to this, he published, six years after, two short
catechisms—one introductory to, the other explanatory of,
the Shorter Catechism. All these publications have been very
extensively useful. In 1765, he published, what was at the
time by far the most popular and successful of his works,
entitled "The Christian Journal, or Common Incidents
Spiritual Instructors." This work, though it has some of the
literary defects which, on such a subject, might have been
expected from an author so circumstanced, such as the
occasional indulgence of unrefined images, the excess of
detail in tracing the analogies, and a certain monotonous
rhythm of style, in many cases scarcely distinguishable from
blank verse—nevertheless displays an extraordinary richness
and ingenuity of fancy, and in many instances rises into a
most impressive and heart-warming eloquence. In 1766 he
published a History of the Rise and Progress of the
Secession, and, the year following, a series of Letters on
the Constitution, Discipline, and Government of the
Christian Church. These tracts were followed by his Sacred
Tropology, the first of a series of works which he designed
for the purpose of giving a clear, comprehensive, and
regular view of the figures, types, and predictions of
Scripture. The second and third parts were published in
1781.
In the year
1768, in consequence of the death of the Rev. John Swanston
of Kinross, Professor of Divinity under the Associate Synod,
Mr Brown was elected to the vacant chair. The duties of this
important office he discharged with great ability and
exemplary diligence and success. His public prelections were
directed to the two main objects, first, of instructing his
pupils in the science of Christianity, and secondly, of
impressing their hearts with its power. The system of
Divinity which he was led, in the course of his professional
duty, to compile, and which was afterwards published, is
perhaps the one of all his works which exhibits most
striking proofs of precision, discrimination, and
enlargement of thought; and is altogether one of the most
dense, and at the same time perspicuous views which has yet
been given of the theology of the Westminster Confession.
The charge which he took of those committed to his care, was
not entirely of the ‘ex cathedra’ description. The situation
of the Hall in a small provincial town, and the manners of
the age, combined with his just sense of the importance of
the students’ private exertions and personal habits, enabled
him to exercise a much more minute and household
superintendance over the young men under his direction.
Frequently in the morning he was accustomed to go his rounds
among their lodgings, to assure himself that they were
usefully employing "the golden hours of prime." The personal
contact between professor and pupils was thus remarkably
close and unbroken, and hence we find that among those who
can recollect their attendance on the Divinity Hall at
Haddington, the interest with which every mind looks back to
the scenes and seasons of early study has a greater
character of individuality, and is associated with minuter
recollections than we generally meet with after so long a
lapse of years.
The same year
in which he was elected to the theological chair he preached
and published a very powerful sermon on Religious
Steadfastness, in which he dwells at considerable length on
the religious state of the nation, and expresses violent
apprehensions at the visible diffusion and advance of what
he called latitudinarianism, and what we of this tolerant
age would term liberality of religions sentiment. He
likewise this year gave to the world one of the most
elaborate, and certainly one of the most valuable of all his
writings, the Dictionary of the Holy Bible. For popular use,
it is unquestionably the most suitable work of the kind
which yet exists, containing the results of most extensive
and various reading both in the science and in the
literature of Christianity, given without pretension or
parade, and with a uniform reference to practical utility.
In 1771, the Honourable and Reverend Mr Shirley, by command
of the Countess of Huntingdon, applied to Mr Brown for his
opinions on the grand subject of justification, in view of a
conference to be held on this question with Mr Wesley and
his preachers. This application gave occasion to a long and
animated correspondence with that noble lady, (a
correspondence which, in consequence of our author’s
modesty, remained a secret till after his death,) and to a
series of articles from his pen on the doctrine of
justification, which appeared, from time to time, in the
Gospel Magazine and Theological Miscellany, between the
years 1770 and 1776. In the same year he was led, by a
desire to contribute to the yet better instruction of his
students, to form the design of composing a manual of church
history on a general and comprehensive plan. It was to
consist of three parts, "the first comprehending a general
view of transactions relating to the church from the birth
of our Saviour to the present time; the second containing
more fully the histories of the Reformed British Churches in
England, Scotland, Ireland, and America; the third to
comprehend the histories of the Waldenses and the Protestant
churches of Switzerland, France, Holland, Germany, Denmark,
Sweden, Poland, and Hungary." Of these he completed the two
former, his General History having been published in 1771,
and his History of the British Churches in the beginning of
1784. These form very useful popular compends, though
destitute of high historical authority. The history of the
British Churches, as a work of original research, is much
superior to the more general compilation, which is little
more than an abridgment of Mosheim, written in a more fervid
spirit than the latter is accustomed to display. Mr Brown’s
next publication appeared in 1775, and was an edition of the
metrical "Psalms, with notes exhibiting the connection,
explaining the sense, and for directing and animating the
devotion." In 1778 he gave to the world the great work on
which his reputation is chiefly founded, "The
Self-Interpreting Bible," the object of which is to
condense, within a manageable compass, all the information
which an ordinary reader may find necessary for attaining an
intelligent and practical knowledge of the sacred oracles.
The first publication of this work was attended with
considerable difficulties, in consequence of the claim of
the king’s printers to the exclusive right of printing the
authorized version of the Scriptures, whether accompanied or
not with illustrative matter. This claim, however, having
been set aside, the work was at length given to the world in
1778, and received with a high and gradually increasing and
still un-exhausted approbation. The same year he published a
small tract entitled "the Oracles of Christ Abominations of
Antichrist," and four years after, his "Letters on
Toleration:" strenuously maintaining the unlawfulness of
tolerating by authority a false religion in a professedly
Christian country. These publications originated in the
universal sentiment of alarm entertained by the evangelical
presbyterians of Scotland, both within and without the
establishment, in consequence of the proposed abolition of
the penal code against the Roman Catholics.
In 1781,
besides his works on the types and prophecies formerly
referred to, he published a sermon on the "Duty of Raising
up Spiritual Children unto Christ," preached partly at
Whitburn, and partly after his son Ebenezer’s ordination at
Inverkeithing. He likewise, in the course of the same year,
wrote a pamphlet in defence of the re-exhibition of the
testimony, and a collection of the biographies of eminent
divines, under the name of the "Christian Student and
Pastor." This was the first of a series of similar
compilations intended as illustrations and examples of
practical religion, and was followed in 1781 by the "Young
Christian," and in 1783 by the "Lives of thirteen Eminent
Private Christians." In 1783, he published a small
"Concordance to the Bible." The year following, he received
an invitation from the reformed Dutch church in America, to
become their Professor of Divinity, which he declined, and
modestly kept secret. And, in 1785, he concluded his career
as an author, by a pamphlet against time travelling of the
Mail on the Lord’s-day—a day for the observance of which, in
time strictest degree of sanctity, he always showed himself
peculiarly jealous, not only abstaining himself, but
prohibiting his family, from speaking on that day on any
worldly affair, even on such as related to what may be
called the secularities of religion and the church. The
tracts published by him in periodical works, along with his
"Letters on Gospel Preaching and the Behaviour of
Ministers," were collected after his death, and published
under the title of "Remains."
Throughout
his writings, Mr Brown’s uniform aim was general utility;
personal emolument formed no part of his object, and
certainly very little of his attainment, as the whole profit
accruing to himself from his voluminous, and in many cases,
successful works, amounted to only £40. Without possessing
much original genius, but on the other hand too ready, it
may be, to submit the freedom of his mind to system and
authority, he was endowed with a strong aptitude for
acquisition, and great power of arrangement, a sound and
generally sober judgment, and a rich and vivid fancy, though
united with a defective, or rather, perhaps, an uncultivated
taste. The selection of subjects, and general conception of
almost every one of them, are very happy, and in many cases
the execution proves his high endowments for the task he
undertook.
The time now
drew near that he should die. For some years previous, he
had been greatly annoyed with a gradual failure, at once in
the bodily power of digestion and the mental faculty of
memory—the symptoms of a constitution fairly worn out by the
intense and incessant labours to which it had been
subjected. In the beginning of 1787, his complaints
increased in such an alarming degree, accompanied by a
general and extreme debility, that he found it necessary to
abandon the pulpit. During the months of spring, he lived in
a continual state of earnest and active preparation for the
great change he was about to undergo. He expired on the 19th
June, and on the 24th his remains were followed to their
place of repose in Haddington church-yard, by nearly the
whole inhabitants of the town, and a large concourse of his
friends and brethren from a distance. At the first meeting
of the Associate Synod after his decease, "the Synod," as
their minute bears, "unanimously agreed to take this
opportunity of testifying their respect to the memory of the
Rev. John Brown, their late Professor, whose eminent piety,
fervent zeal, extensive charity, and unwearied diligence in
promoting the interests of religion, will be long remembered
by this court, especially by those members of it who had the
happiness of studying divinity under his inspection."
Memoir of Rev John Brown taken from his Bible
 |
|
Edinburgh and
The Lothians
Chapter XXIV - Haddington
A MAN whose daily
task was to mole among gas-pipes and the like under every part
of the burgh of Haddington told me that wherever he dug he found
human bones, and the most he judged to have come there by
violence of fire, flood, plague or slaughter. To-day the town is
trim and quiet, in its broad streets, with here and there grass
between the stones. Some places have old-time names, as Poldrate,
The Lang Causey, the Butts. It lies low down by the Tyne, which
divides it from the suburb of Nungate. There are trees and
abundant green in it, and about it,—as where not in
Scotland?—the all-saving presence of the hills—the Garleton
ridge to the north, the Lammermuirs to the south. These last
change even as living forms under change of weather. Now they
gather round and bend over the town, and again they withdraw to
far-off horizons, and they smile bright or frown dark, but
always potent.
I remember quiet
Haddington quainter than it now is. In the admirable
Castellated and Domestic Architecture of Scotland, by
MacGibbon and Ross, are drawings of the Roundles at Bedlam
Close, Farmer’s House in the Nungate, and the so-called Bothwell
Castle. Those competent judges thought them most important and
interesting. The first two are clean vanished, and Bothwell
Castle is a crumbling, deserted ruin. The whole of Nungate was
once a jewel of rare excellence. Miry and malodorous, dirty and
disreputable, it was yet the very image of the old Scots town of
centuries ago. It was crammed with every feature of old Scots
architecture. Roundles, pends, closes, wynds, outside stairs,
everything! Nobody built, nobody pulled down. It culminated in
Farmer’s House, some work of the wealthy, ancient Abbey to which
Nungate belonged, and there was and still is the ruined old
chapel of St Martin, of forgotten origin. When the moonlight
scored and underlined the fantastic shadows of the old houses,
and you looked across the Tyne at the river front of Bothwell
Castle, with its dim yet authentic tradition of Mary Stuart and
her wicked spouse, and you caught a snatch of old Scots rhyme,
simple and romantic, sung by children at play, you had found the
supreme moment for Nungate of Haddington. I shall never walk in
it again. There is a new bridge over the Tyne, and a new
flour-mill with a new name, and the house-breaker and the
house-builder are busy, and Nungate is swept and garnished. If I
lived in it I should be delighted, but I would that some
millionaire of antiquarian taste had bought all fifty years
since, and carefully dusted and preserved it under glass as a
unique specimen of what is now gone and cannot return.
The parish
church, or Auld Kirk, dedicated to St Mary, was known as
Lucerna Laudoniae, the Lamp of Lothian, because it was
splendid, or some say because it carried a light to guide the
traveller over these dreary wastes and moorland that are now
fertile fields. But most church towers of old carried a light;
and though the tower be square, and massive, and imposing, yet
it lies so low down that I doubt the efficacy of the light.
Moreover, just as the old church builder loved his gargoyle and
his pinnacle, so the old church writer loved his picturesque
phrase and his parable. Does not the light of the lamp admirably
image forth spiritual and temporal splendour? The antiquary here
puts his spoke in the wheel. The real lamp, he will have it, was
a bowshot off—a Franciscan monastery, in fact, whereof not a
stone remains. I cannot tell. This at least is served heir to
every species of church that ever was in Haddington, and with
its comely stone, its fair shape, and a certain restraint and
dignity in all its lines, it is a beautiful relic of other days.
An old woman who had lived all her life under its shadow told me
that as she grew up everything in Haddington shrunk and became
less to her save this old church. It has been fearfully mauled
about. The "Auld Enemy" with his torch, and the too early
Restorer with his compass, the passionate Reformer, the callous
Philistine, all did their cruel worst. The choir is a ruin, what
is left shored up with difficulty, and every stone has marks of
some evil touch, yet it is fair and impressive in spite of
everything. The mediaeval world could do one thing, at any rate,
supremely well: it could big a kirk. The best your modern can do
is to imitate. He cannot always manage even that. If you look
across towards the river you will think that same vanished world
could do one other thing, and that was, build a brig! The
Nungate bridge, which connects with that suburb, is straight and
narrow, and it is steep to climb, but it has the same beautiful
stone as the kirk, the like graceful arch, the like formal
symmetry. The last restorers, to give them their due, have been
modest and discreet; they have destroyed the destroyers, and
looked back rather than forward. You see brig and kirk to-day
under the best conditions.
And what about
those "fellows in the cellarage"—those silent witnesses under
the soil? Impossible to recover the history of any one, yet the
history of the town explains how they came there. It was four
times burned. Once by chance or malice, thrice in warfare with
the "Auld Enemy," of course—the enemy that meets you at every
turn in Scots annals to check and thwart. It was flooded again
and again. The plague, a constantly-returning dread, tore at it
year by year. Less than a century since there was a severe
visitation of cholera. Careful cleaning, sanitation, whitewash,
pure water supply are recent things. One or two scraps of
doubtful authenticity have escaped the general oblivion. The
flood of 1358 threatened to sweep away kirk and town in common
ruin, when a nun, seizing an image of the Virgin, vowed it
should go too unless Our Lady condescended to help her own. And
there is a comic interlude of a citizen of Nungate who perched
on the detached roof of his hut, with dog, cat and cock for
fellows.
"Row we merely
(merrily)
Quo John Burley,"
japed he with
sardonic mirth when he swept under the bridge, "a saying of
Nungate in Haddington to this day," but the scribe himself has
gone centuries ago.
 |
What do YOU think ?
Send an email with your comments to
todd @ preteristarchive.com
Be sure to include the article name.
They will be posted shortly
upon receipt
- Date:
- 28 Oct 2003
- Time:
- 10:18:42
Comments
Unfortunately, dead preterists were just as wrong as living preterists. The scholarly John Brown made the same basic mistake of relying on his mere personal opinions rather than relying on the complete and consistent typology that God provided as the ONLY key to understanding the NT in general and the first century in particular.
- Date:
- 29 Oct 2003
- Time:
- 05:02:39
Comments
Dear Todd: Excellent material, but how many are able to comprehend such elementary truths? Men prefer to build their own systems and worship them at the expense of Truth. Bro. Bob Pelham, N. C. usmc1div@earthlink.net
- Date:
- 29 Oct 2003
- Time:
- 07:48:51
Comments
"Excellent material?" Far from it. This article is another example of what the second comment above refers to -- men building their own systems and worshiping them at the expense of truth. Man-made systems result from relying on mere personal opinions rather than relying on complete and consistent typology. Unfortunately, a link to a web site dealing with types that has just been posted on the Archive does more harm than good; the claimed difficulties in the understanding and use of types don't exist. The simple and utterly logical truth is that the natural journeys and battles of natural and temporary OT Israel were types of the spiritual journeys and battles of spiritual and eternal NT Israel (Christ and the church). The seven feasts of Lev. 23 are the God-given road map for those journeys but for 1,900 years Bible "scholars" have proudly and stubbornly refused to admit that they need such a map. Instead, their reliance on their inadequate personal opinions has sent them racing off in different directions and has resulted in a multitude of erroneous and conflicting "systems of theology." Christ's parousia occurred in the first century -- but NOT in AD 70.
- Date:
- 29 Oct 2003
- Time:
- 16:54:58
Comments
Re: THE SEVEN FEASTS ---- David Curtis has a 5-part audio and text presentation (click on the 10-26-03 Birks/Cook item) in which he presents some useful information about the seven feasts of Lev. 23. However, Curtis stumbles when he tries to explain the first-century spiritual fulfillment of the last three feasts. First, he seems to be unaware that the fifth feast, rosh ha shanah or head of the year, celebrated on Tishri 1, marked the birthday of THE WORLD (Israel was born in the month of Abib or Nisan). Second, he seems to be unaware that the typifying natural fulfillment of the last three feasts in the case of OT Israel - and thus that nation's typifying complete natural redemption - did not occur until God enabled natural Israel, through the use of its natural weapons, to overcome the usurping NATURAL dominion of the pagan nations in its natural promised land (Canaan), which occurred AFTER the typifying 40 OT wilderness years. Therefore, in the first century the spiritual fulfillment of the last three feasts - and the complete spiritual redemption of spiritual Israel (the church) - did not occur until God enabled the church, through the use of its spiritual weapons, to overcome the usurping SPIRITUAL dominion of the pagan nations in its spiritual promised land (the world), which by typological definition had to occur AFTER the 40 fulfillment years (AD 30-70). That usurping, satanic spiritual dominion (overlooked by Bible "scholars" for 1,900 years) was the worldwide enforcement of the blasphemy of emperor worship by Rome, the spiritual Babylon of the book of Revelation.
Date: 26 Sep 2006
Time: 06:33:37
Comments:
Was wondering are there many bibles of john brown of haddington 1722 has the
same memoirs as you have on your main page. We was given one from our mum
and there is dates from family members datin back to 1895 inside the bible
unfortunely it had a little water damage and the front cover has come off
also inside there is a mothers union of St Johns Spittal Berwick on Tweed
dating 1935 enrolling Mrs W Robson. Would like to get more information on
these if you can help or can advise me where to go to find out as the bible
has been in the family since 1885
|