|
|
|
|
|
|
Church History's
"Preterist Assumption"
Hyper Preterism: Defining "Hyper Preterism"- Criticisms from the Inside - Criticisms from the Outside || Progressive Pret | Regressive Pret | Former Full Preterists | Pret Scholars | Normative Pret | Reformed Pret | Pret Idealism | Pret Universalism |
JEWISH/CHRISTIAN BIBLICAL STUDIES (1500BC-AD70) | EARLY CHRISTIAN PRETERISM (AD70-1000) | FREE ONLINE BOOKS (AD1000-2008)
|
PRETERIST-IDEALISM
2 Cor. 1:20 "For all the promises of God, whatever their number, have their confirmation in Him; and for this reason through Him also our "Amen" acknowledges their truth and promotes the glory of God through our faith." Weymouth New Testament | "'Tis ordinarily said, that the Jews were a typical people, the whole divine economy toward them is doctrinal and instructive to us, not immediately or literally, but by way of Anagogy" - Henry Hammond |
Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; old things have passed away; behold, all things have become new. 2 Corinthians 5:17
PRETERIST-IDEALISM (PI, aka Modern Idealism) - A) Umbrella term covering those who see the true focus of Bible prophecy as the work of Jesus Christ throughout all ages. Historical fulfillments in the history of natural Israel - notably in the events of Moses' and Jesus' generations - are seen as the outward "typological" show of the everlasting work of Christ. B) Though Idealism has been taught by spiritually minded writers throughout the Christian era (such as the Allegorists, Quakers, Swedeborgians, Medieval Monks, and countless others), very seldom have forms utilizing a "Preterist modifier" been published. Saint Augustine is considered the father of Idealism, though systems anchored historically by the Preterist view are only now being developed among Modern Preterists. Those forms of Idealism without the "Preterist modifier" often qualify as Historicism or Futurism C) The spectrum of known systems range from those more heavily Idealist (looking to Christ for the substance of prophecy) to those more heavily Preterist (looking to history for the substance of prophecy). (Fundamentally neither preterist nor futurist ; PreteristArchive.com's native approach ; More Information Here)
"This view dominated the history of interpretation from
Augustine through the Reformation."
LATEST ADDITIONS :
A Statement on "Preterist Idealism" in Bennett's Apology (2009) "Dee Dee had mentioned that some FP would run with the pic. when she had posted it, which is why I said "couldn't resist" in my email. At the time they were being very friendly to Pret. Idealism which is "modern" according to TD and still sees the Res. of dead / 2nd Coming etc. as past but ongoing, so really should not be accepted by anyone arguing from the "2000 years of church history" view IMO. I saw it as a way to "kill 2 birds with one stone" so to speak." [My view is that the escaton is past, present and future in Jesus Christ.. as in "Jesus is the same yesterday, today and forever." and "I am the Alpha and the Omega," says the Lord God, "who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty." The attitude of earnest expectation for the coming of the Lord and resurrection from the dead which refused to wane even during in the Middle Ages is a discipline worth keeping. The Preterist worldview pinches the ability to perceive the entire field of prophetic fulfillment by an unbalanced dedication to that which can be seen.]
Willibald Beyschlag, New Testament Theology (1895) "The common error.. of conceiving the parousia as a single historical event instead of the whole course of Christ's victory and triumph over the historical world, dominates also the writer of the Apocalypse. But this error marks simply the necessary limits of prophecy, which Paul describes in the words (1 Cor. xiii. 12): "Now we see (in our prophecy) through a glass in a riddle, but then face to face." To see the things of the future face to face is granted only to the after life ; to him who looks forward the future appears only in the mirror of the present ; the symbol of the future hovers before him in the signs of his time. Hence the conflict of Christian history and the hope of eternal victory were to the writer of the Apocalypse symbolically reflected in the confusions of his time ; and if he saw close at hand the eternal triumph of the kingdom of God, he simply erred in the same way as Isaiah or his greater post-Exilic successor, the former of whom expected that the Assyrian oppression and deliverance from it, and the latter that the Babylonian captivity and deliverance, alone separated them from the Messianic salvation."
Audio/Video: Rod Edwards: The History of HyperPreterism - (Interesting and Good video, although I haven't left Preterist Idealism. I am more convinced than ever that Jesus Himself is the telos and eschaton, and that this honor does not belong to some singular day in history (which results in Universalism whether it is a past day or future day in continuing history). If any be "in Christ" (not "in history") old things pass away and become new. [Also note from 2007: The (New) History of Full Preterism (Part Two) (WMV File) Big file.])
|
|
John Cassian (420) "The tropological sense is the moral explanation which has to do with improvement of life and practical teaching, as if we were to understand by these two covenants practical and theoretical instruction, or at any rate as if we were to want to take Jerusalem or Sion as the soul of man, according to this: "Praise the Lord, O Jerusalem: praise thy God, O Sion." (Conferences) Frederic W. Farrar: Christ Wails Over Jerusalem (1899) "This incident is an allegory. The soul of each one amongst us is such a Jerusalem. The soul has its history of shame or of faithfulness, and its prophecy of triumph or of doom, just as Jerusalem had. Jerusalem had warnings.. Jerusalem found that it was so, and so shall all men who persist in defying the mercy of God which calleth us to repentance." Peter J. Leithart ""[T]ropologically, the history of Jerusalem can be understood as a model for the history of the soul (secundum tropologiam). Just as David conquered Jerusalem and set up the Lord's throne there, so Jesus, His Son, conquers the inner city of the sinner and consecrates him as a saint, a holy one." (Ascent to Love, pp. 22) Isaac Pennington (1658) "Now for the sakes of such as have been truly exercised in their spirits by the Spirit of the Lord, (and have felt the powerful work of his grace, and a building raised up by him) and may yet be further exercised, I shall add this. Jerusalem was a type of an inward building in the spirits of God's people" Joseph Wood (1906) "Inspiration is that which is of universal application. If any utterance is only for an age, and local in its interpretation, we do not regard it as inspired. The Psalms, for instance, were mostly suggested by local considerations, the trials, the joys, the experiences of David and others, under peculiar circumstances. But, nevertheless, we feel as we read them that they pass beyond the limits of the local and the individual— they belong to humanity—they are true of human nature and life everywhere. Or take Christ's prophecy of the destruction of Jerusalem. It was spoken at Jerusalem about Jerusalem, and in a manner which seemed limited to Jerusalem. But had the prophecy been true only of that city of sorrows, it would never have been regarded as inspired. Whereas Christ's principle was this : that the doom pronounced on Jerusalem was universally applicable, and that it was but a style and specimen of God's judgment everywhere. The judgment comes wherever there is evil grown ripe for judgment, wherever corruption is complete. And the gathering of the Roman eagles to the carcase is but a specimen of the way in which judgment at last overtakes any city, any country, and any man in whom evil has reached the point where there is no possibility of cure. We who have lived through the last fifty years have seen the eagles gathered together in Naples, in America, in France, in Bulgaria. The Lord's judgment on Jerusalem has been fulfilled many times—it was not simply of local but of universal application." (The Bible, what it is and is not [lects.], p. 97) Writers on the "Tropological Sense" of Jerusalem
Marcus Booker
Todd Dennis
William Neil (1950) God's timeless judgment which is past, present, and future - "[The Day of the Lord] is God's timeless Judgment which IS past, present, and future. In a sense it is always to come, in a sense it is always present, and in a sense it has already been passed . . . Thus the Parousia [a technical word for the second coming] is, like Creation, in a real sense timeless; not an historical event, but the underlying purpose of history and the summing up of all things in Christ." (Thessalonians, pp. xli–xlii) Joseph Wood (1906) "Inspiration is that which is of universal application. If any utterance is only for an age, and local in its interpretation, we do not regard it as inspired. The Psalms, for instance, were mostly suggested by local considerations, the trials, the joys, the experiences of David and others, under peculiar circumstances. But, nevertheless, we feel as we read them that they pass beyond the limits of the local and the individual— they belong to humanity—they are true of human nature and life everywhere. Or take Christ's prophecy of the destruction of Jerusalem. It was spoken at Jerusalem about Jerusalem, and in a manner which seemed limited to Jerusalem. But had the prophecy been true only of that city of sorrows, it would never have been regarded as inspired. Whereas Christ's principle was this : that the doom pronounced on Jerusalem was universally applicable, and that it was but a style and specimen of God's judgment everywhere. The judgment comes wherever there is evil grown ripe for judgment, wherever corruption is complete. And the gathering of the Roman eagles to the carcase is but a specimen of the way in which judgment at last overtakes any city, any country, and any man in whom evil has reached the point where there is no possibility of cure. We who have lived through the last fifty years have seen the eagles gathered together in Naples, in America, in France, in Bulgaria. The Lord's judgment on Jerusalem has been fulfilled many times—it was not simply of local but of universal application." (The Bible, what it is and is not [lects.], p. 97)
|
Revelation in Natural
Israel's History
Seen in the Land Promises
Natural Israel's History as a Parable from Beginning to Very End
: The natural fulfillment of the prophecies of the land of promise (Josh. 21:43-45 "all came to pass") is not the climax (Heb. 11:13 "these died not having received the promises"), but just the outward show of the true substance to which it pointed (Heb. 11:16 "they aspire to a better land -- a heavenly one.. He hath prepared a city for them."), which can be received in Jesus Christ alone (II Cor. 1:20 "For all the promises of God, whatever their number, have their confirmation in Him")
Gen 18:18
Seeing that Abraham shall surely
become a great and mighty nation, and all the nations of
the earth shall be blessed in him
That is not to say, again,
that the land promises weren't
totally fulfilled in typological fulfillment of
the promise to Israel (Joshua 11.23; Joshua 21.43,45;
Joshua 23.14; 1 Kings 4.21; 1 Kings 8.56)... just that
this possession of the natural land only looked to
something eternal in nature, AND ONLY RECEIVABLE IN
JESUS CHRIST, NOT IN HISTORY.
Heb 11:9,16 9
By faith he sojourned in the land
of promise, as in a strange country, dwelling in
tabernacles with Isaac and Jacob, the heirs with him of
the same promise: For he looked for a city which hath
foundations, whose builder and maker is God.. But now
they desire a better country, that is, an heavenly.
This same principle is true of all visible,
historical signs.. such as circumcision (which was a
physical sign of spiritual things, Ro 4:11), the
resurrection of Christ (which was a physical sign of
spiritual things, Mt 12:39) and the fall of Jerusalem
(which was also a physical sign of spiritual things, Mt
24:30)."
"We should not, however, bypass the shadows and only focus on the ultimate fulfillments, as though the accomplishment of the outward show is irrelevant. Likewise, we should not consider the accomplishment of the natural to be the substance of what is being revealed, as though the giving of the sign is the substance of the sign... after all, symbols do not symbolize themselves."
What do YOU think ?
Submit Your Comments For Posting Here
..Will Be Spam
Filtered and Posted Shortly..
Email PreteristArchive.com's Sole Developer and Curator, Todd Dennis
(todd @ preteristarchive.com)
Opened in 1996 |