|
|
|
| ![]() Website Color Key |
Free Online Books/MP: Peter J. Leithart - The Promise of His Appearing (2004) FULL BOOK at Google Books 'Leithart gives a preterist reading of 2 Peter. He defines preterism as "the view that prophecies about an imminent "day of judgement" scattered throughout the New Testament were fulfilled in the apostolic age by the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70, the event that brought a final end to the structures and orders of the Old Creation or Old Covenant.”
| |
Preterist Timeline of the Great Tribulation By Doug Beaumont
The Sealed Scroll - Coincidence??? Starting from Jesus' words in the Olivett Discourse (Mt. 24, Lk. 21, Mk.13) we can see that the events spoken of refer to the same events in Daniel (Mt. 24:15). Once we have carefully laid out the order of these events in the Olivett Discourse, we can also see that they very closely parallel Jesus' words in Revelation 6. What is interesting is that at the end of Daniel where he asks about the Great Tribulation (Dan. 12:1,6), he is told to seal up his book (12:4,9) because it relates to events at the time of the end. Note how Revelation 6 opens up - the unsealing of a scroll! Could this be the very scroll Daniel was told to seal? Now, if Daniel is writing about the Great Tribulation (during the time of the end), and Jesus identifies this time with the events of the Olivett Discourse (at the end of the age), and these parallel Revelation 6 - should they not tell the same story? As we see, they do. Coming Soon If these things are so, what does it mean when John is told these things are about to take place (Rev. 1:1 and 22:10, 22)? Note that John is told in verse 22 that he is NOT to seal up his book (for the time was near). This is the exact opposite of Daniel's admonition TO seal his book (for the time was apparently still far in the future). Consider this: John wrote Revelation in the 1st Century A.D. If Daniel wrote around 550 B.C. (when "the end" was still far off), and John wrote about the same events less than than 600 years after Daniel (when "the time" was near), how could we still be looking for fulfillment 2,000 years later? The End - of what? Daniel was specifically told that "the end" would come when the "power of the holy people [the Jews]" was shattered. The power of the Jews was shattered in 70 A.D. at the destruction of the temple and the city of Jerusalem . . . and it was this very destruction that Jesus was speaking of in the Olivett Discourse (Mt.23:38-24:4). Matthew records that Jesus said the end would come after the Gospel had been preached in the whole world. It would seem that this could not have happened by 70 A.D. But as Paul shows in Colossians 1:5-6, 23 and Romans 10:18 it had in fact gone into the whole world ("the world" was synonymous with the Roman Empire - see Acts 11:28; 17:6). "The End" was the end of the Old Covenant. The "end times" (or "last days") were the transition period that lasted about 40 years starting from the time of Christ and extending one generation (Mt. 24:34) to 70 A.D. Just as the Old Covenant was established after a 40 year transition time (from Egypt to the Promised Land), so was the New established in a 40 year transition out of spiritual Egypt (1 Cor. 10:1-6; Gal 4:21-31; Heb. 4:9; Rev. 11:8 & 19). Conclusion If these things are so then Daniel, John, and Jesus are referring to the 70 A.D. destruction of Jerusalem with regard to the Great Tribulation and the Day of The Lord judgment that the Jews incurred when they rejected Messiah (Mt. 23:36-39). If this is true then, of course, the Great Tribulation is over. Send an email with your comments to todd @ preteristarchive.com Be sure to include the article name. They will be posted shortly upon receipt
CommentsShort, sweet, and to the point. If I weren't already a preterist, this would probably get me pointed in that direction. I've seen very little in response to the sealed scroll arguments in the futurist camp, and I would like to see a futurist respond to this sometime. KP
CommentsIt's no coincidence that in our Bible Daniel is the 27th book of the OT and Revelation is the 27th book of the NT. However, preterists are wrong when they assert that OC, natural Israel passed away and NC, spiritual Israel appeared in the autumn of AD 70. God selected the month of Tishri (in autumn) for the birth of the old, typifying and temporary natural WORLD (see Gen. 8:13) and subsequently selected the month of Abib or Nisan (in spring) for the birth of the old, typifying and temporary natural nation of ISRAEL. Then, in the first-century fulfillment, the new and spiritual and eternal Israel also was born IN THE SPRING - in AD 30 - and NOT in autumn of any year. Any claim to the contrary involves a gross distortion of Bible typology.
CommentsYou have provided a compelling argument supporting your view of a past Great Tribulation. However, what are we all to make of a further 2000 years of human history to this very day . With an exploding population, heavy industrialized world and many still feeling that there is something yet to come, is there anything to be said what awaits us in this age?
CommentsWhat is the explaination of the two witnesses that are taken out of the way?
CommentsYes, the Great Tribulation is over -- but it did not end in 70 A.D. The Jews still suffered tribulation when deported and scattered worldwide, and this tribulation climaxed in the Holocaust. After the tribulation was over, there followed the signs in sun, moon and stars -- as space exploration began. See: http://www.BibleForetoldHolocaust.com http://www.1260days.com
CommentsYou are the apostate church. I will pray for you, that you might see the error of your ways. God is patient, He is still waiting for you to come to Him, so that you can be saved. May God have mercy on your souls. Date: 29 Sep 2005 Date: 31 Jan 2006 Date: 19 Mar 2006 Date: 20 Aug 2006 |
Email PreteristArchive.com's Sole Developer and Curator, Todd Dennis
(todd @ preteristarchive.com)
Opened in 1996 |