|
|
|
| ![]() Website Color Key |
Matthew 26:64 is NOT a "Preterist Time Indicator" Pointing to AD70 "In short, the usage of "Apo Arti" in Matthew 26:64 [Apo ("from" - Strongs 575) and Arti ("now on" - Strong's 737)] is highly suggestive of the themes that have been previously offered at this blog ; that is, a series of revelatory recognitions of the power and glory of Jesus Christ's dominance by friend and foe alike. Though the typically pret-friendly Weymouth translation would like to make Jesus say "later on, you will see.." this is not really honest. I would rather say that it was simply a mistake, but I find it impossible to believe that neither Richard Francis Weymouth ("If this belief ever obtains general acceptance the earlier date of the Apocalypse will also be regarded as fully established. For it will then be seen that the book describes beforehand events which took place in 70 A.D.") nor Earnest Hampden-Cook (co-editor and author of "The Christ Has Come") were aware of how important (ironically) a futurist spin on this passage is to uphold their Preterist assumptions. However, not only is there no sense of futurity in this very emphatic Greek phrase, but rather we see quite the opposite.
![]() |
HYPER PRETERIST MENU
Hyper Preterist Archive (under construction) |
|
When is Preterism taken too far? Is it possible to take fulfillment beyond the point of Scriptural warrant? At what point has the declaration of past fulfillment overstepped biblical bounds? Naturally, it depends on who you ask. For instance, strict Futurists would say that making AD70 the only fulfillment for any of the Olivet Discourse (as opposed to those events serving as a type of the future tribulation) would be taking fulfillment too far. Historical preterists would say that declaring the parousia, great white throne judgment, and general resurrection to be strictly in the past crosses the line into hyper preterism -- and wouldn't the entirety of (non full-pret) Christianity throughout all ages agree at least that far? Many, in fact, would go much farther, declaring that anyone who taught that the coming, judgment and resurrection of the dead were past events are outside of the Christian faith altogether. However, what makes the discussion more interesting is that even full preterists believe that there is some point where fulfillment has been taken too far. A virtually unanimous example of this would include the declarations by certain full preterists that the gospel was only for the pre-AD70 era. (Less consensus is found on the issues of the cessation of baptism and the Lord's Supper.) First, then, there is no proper denying that there is such a thing as hyper preterism. Secondary is the issue of whether or not hyper preterism is worthy to be held in contempt. Another consideration is this: If such large segments of preterists are actually hyper preterists, then what is true preterism? | ![]() How Much is Too Much? |
|
This page will explore these concerns by posting perceived examples of hyper preterism. Various possibilities will be offered for the definition and identification of "hyper preterism," using full preterist assertions as the grounds for investigation. Full preterists are encouraged to participate by either posting assent or dissent regarding whether these assertions should qualify as hyper preterism... and whether that is grounds for separation. Lack of dissent, or the belittling of the investigation, would seem to imply consent. If anyone now disclaims comments posted here that they have made in the past, I will gladly make note of that shift away from hyper preterism in the appropriate place. (under construction) | |
Because few FPs really believe that every wind of doctrine is just "another legitimate alternative."
Because denying hyper preterism exists (or belittling its investigation) encourages the accumulation of error.
Because denying hyper preterism exists (or belittling its investigation) discourages those studying preterism.
Because a growing number of reasonable former full preterists are saying that the system is fundamentally flawed.
Because if it isn't true that so much ceased in AD70, then a horrible eschatological error is being spread.
Because if eschatology and salvation are so closely linked, grievous errors in one would be grievous errors in the other.
LATEST ADDITION
Chris Livingston definition of Hyper-Preterism: "As you may have noticed, in the forum on ZECH 14, I'm dialoging with a guy called RiversofEden who calls himself a Preterist, and he thinks Christianity was always and only for genetic Jews, but that it also went extinct at 70 AD. So, I think that an over-significance can be made of 70 AD. Judgment of Jerusalem. Yes. Fulfillment of all prophecy concerning the long-awaited beginning of Christ's Kingdom, the Coming of the Son of Man, and Judean Judgment? Yes. Extinction of the New Covenant and the Church in its infancy? No. Obsolescence of the Sermon on the Mount? No. Cessation of the activity of the person, who is quoted in the Book of Acts, known as the Holy Spirit? Only to the degree that believers refuse to separate from iniquity and statist idolatry." ("The Over-Significance of AD70" -http://planetpreterist.com/news-5441.html#38214)
Would any Full Preterist deny that this is hyper-preterism? I don't think the old covenant ceased at the cross of Christ. It was done at the destruction of Jerusalem. After the cross, its began to fade away as we've seen in the book of Hebrews. The new covenant began on the Day of Pentecost which the saints were filled with the holy spirit and Christ was their King. Now, this may be an interesting part, the judgment began at 66 AD when the saints were "raised" and "received" the thrones of kingdom with the parousia of Christ at that time, not 70 AD yet. See Rev. 11:15-19; Matt. 19:28; and Luke 22:30. The old covenant and the new covenant were overlaping during 30-70 AD. It seems that BOTH WERE ENDED at 70 AD. When all things (the judgment, the enemies, the resurrection, the kingdom, the death, the covenants, and the Law) that were subjected to him, he delivered up to his God (Yahweh) the Father which He may be all in all. (Cite)
Hyper Preterist Link? Anarcho-Pantelism Website Added - "Anarcho-Pantelism is a lifestyle term used to describe someone who is a full-preterist Christian who also believes that anarcho-capitalism is the best political thought for humanity. Anarcho-pantelists differ from most Western Christians as we believe the Bible offers incredible insight into how to live, why to live that way, and what is offered if you subscribe to the anarcho-pantelist lifestyle. Anarcho-pantelists believe that most Christians are living ignorant of the New Age of God. We don’t believe others are wrong or are liars or are penalized for their lifestyle decisions, but we do believe there is a better way to live — one that is more Biblically sound... We believe that most of the Bible is closed off as a guide to living — it merely lists the actions of God and man over millenia."
"As Preterists, we.." "I am just asking why, as Preterists, we are applying that scripture to us now? "
"We, as Preterists" - If we as preterists say the last day has happened, then logically THE Resurrection has happened – whatever it was."
JUST "HYPER PRETERISM" -- JUST "ANOTHER OPTION" -- OR JUST PLAIN BIBLE ?
As
the End of the Old Covenant Age is so
too is the Start of the New
Covenant Age =
INCOMPLETE UNTIL AD70
Jesus'
Return in Glory - Was in it in AD70, AD66, or BOTH?
A. Jesus'
Return in Glory Was in it in AD70
William Bell -
"What was true of Noah's
day was also true regarding the coming of Christ in A.D.70 at
the fall of Jerusalem." (A Boat Divided)
"Jesus sounded pretty sure of himself regarding the time. He knew
surely that he was coming quickly and that the time was at hand. Now
that is just as it was in the days of Noah, general revelation
initially, but precise information near the end!
As can be observed, the New Testament gives many signs and time statements most of which occur during the final twelve years leading up to
A.D.70, depicting the soon approaching parousia." (A Boat
Divided)
David Curtis
"That which is perfect refers to
the maturity of the body at the rapture of the church, which
happened at the second coming of Christ, bringing in the New Heavens
and New Earth which closed the cannon. This all took place in AD
70, when the Lord returned, bringing in the New Heaven and Earth
where we see Him face to face. So the coming again of our Lord for
his people brought them to full maturity. " (The Permanence of Love)
"Jesus very clearly tells his disciples that before the temple would be destroyed and before His parousia and the end of the age, the gospel must be preached in all the world. And it was! The temple was destroyed! He arrived in full glory! The Old Covenant age ended! " (The Permanence of Love)
Walt Hibbard - "The Second Coming
of Christ, the Resurrection of the Dead from out of Hades, the
Judgment of the Sheep and the Goats, the Marriage Supper of the Lamb
– all would take place literally and coinciding with the Roman
army's march, immediately after the tribulation of those days. For
then “the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, the
voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God. And the dead in
Christ shall rise first. When we who are alive and remain shall be
caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the
air (I Thess. 4:16-17). This was a literal “catching up” of all true
believers on earth at that time." (The Expectation and Logic of a
Literal Catching Up)
Don Preston -
"We
are convinced the only construct of Mark 8:38-9:1 and parallels
which satisfies the chronological and contextual demands is to
understand Jesus predicting his return in full glory to judge all
men... This happened in 70 A.D. when he destroyed Jerusalem"
(An Airtight Argument)
Ed Stevens - "Since that generation passed, those events
(including His return) must already have happened. Therefore, the
passage about not knowing the day or hour no longer applies to us,
because the return is a past event. We now know (historically) the
day and hour of His return (70 A.D.). We no longer need signs
to tell when it is getting close. It is a past event." (That Day and
Hour?)
B. Jesus'
Return in Glory Was in AD66
Ed Stevens -
"The saints were being persecuted. Christ would come and give
them relief (AD 66), and at the same time give tribulation to
their persecutors. We are talking about two different phases of the
tribulation, with Christ’s return in the middle (the first
against the saints in AD 62 - 66, and the second against their
persecutors in AD 66-70).
"If the angelic armies literally seen in the clouds at AD 66
were the fulfillment of ‘every eye shall see Him’ (Rev. 1:7) as
Sproul has allowed as a possibility, then it was also the
fulfillment of Acts 1:11!" (Foreword to the new edition of James
Stuart Russell’s The Parousia Bradford, PA: International, p. xii)
So which is it, AD66 or AD70 !?
Can't be both. Or is there a
THIRD COMING (One in 66 and one in 70) ?
When Did the Old Covenant End ? AD30, AD70, or Both ?
A.
The End of the Old Covenant Age ("This Age") was in AD70
Don Preston -
"Paul's statement that the bondwoman and her son, representative of
the Old Covenant, was yet to be cast out — for persecuting
Christians — is prima fascia proof that the Old Testament did not pass at the cross as is
traditionally maintained by many. Paul emphatically says the Old Covenant
people would be cast out for persecuting Christians, the children of promise
(Galatians 4:28-30). This persecution patently did not occur prior to
the cross. Thus, Israel could not have been cut off at the cross." (The
Passing of the Elements)
"This New World was consummated when God
destroyed his old people, Isaiah 65:13ff, the Old Jerusalem; the Old
Heavens and Earth of Judaism, Isaiah 51:15-16; bringing to a close
the Old World (Age, Matthew 24:3) and bringing to glorious
perfection, 1 Cor. 13:8, the New World. That time was when Jesus
returned and destroyed the capital and hub of the Old World,
Jerusalem, in A.D. 70." (More On No Death, No Sorrow, No Pain)
Michael Sartori - "I would contend that the O/C passed away in
AD70 and the N/C commenced in AD70, at the destruction of Jerusalem.
" (Magi Forum -http://jaygary.com/starof2000/discus/messages/1/1.html)
When Did the New
Covenant "Age to Come" Start ? AD30, AD70, or Both ?
A.
The Start of the New Covenant Age
("The Age to Come") was in AD70
William Bell -
"We all know when it fell, in
A.D.70! Entrance into the Most Holy is a
blessing of the "age to come." Entrance was opened up at the fall of the
temple. Therefore, the blessings of the "age to come" were opened up or
received at the fall of the temple, specifically ETERNAL LIFE!"
(This Present Evil Age)
"How confusing it would have been for Jesus to direct the apostles
to the end of the Christian age which is endless and had not yet
begun when the very age in which they were living had not reached
its consummation!." (When
Did Miracles Cease)
"Namely, that when Jesus answered their objection to the resurrection on the grounds that it did not consist in the fleshly dimension of the Jewish aeon (this age) but in the eternal new covenant aeon (age to come) wherein sonship in Christ is equated with resurrection."
(The Dead Are Raised)
Michael Hill - "Christ's eschaton.. began at the cross and ended
in his parousia (presence/coming) at Jerusalem at the end of the
7-year war with Rome.. Thus, true to Jesus' words, that old world
ended, the dead were judged, the saved were resurrected, and a whole
new realm of grace began" (The Cure for Millennial Madness,
p. 3).
New Earth Christian Studies -
"The Christians of the time were in a unique position:
They were living not just between covenants, but in the end times of
the Old Covenant which coincided with the beginning of the New."
(God's Promises Fulfilled)
Don Preston - "This New World was consummated when God
destroyed his old people, Isaiah 65:13ff, the Old Jerusalem; the Old
Heavens and Earth of Judaism, Isaiah 51:15-16; bringing to a close
the Old World (Age, Matthew 24:3) and bringing to glorious
perfection, 1 Cor. 13:8, the New World. That time was when Jesus
returned and destroyed the capital and hub of the Old World,
Jerusalem, in A.D. 70." (More On No Death, No Sorrow, No Pain)
"I believe the only scenario
that satisfies the teaching of the Old and New Covenants concerning
the Dawning of the New Day is when Christ returned in judgment,
destroying the Old World of Darkness and Death, II Corinthians 3.
This patently was not on Pentecost; the New Testament writers,
writing after Pentecost saw the Day as still future, but imminent, I
Peter 4:5,7; James 5:7-9. The New Day fully came in 70 AD when Jesus
returned in judgment of the Old World of Darkness and brought the
New Day of Salvation. The Day has come." (The Day Has Come)
Michael Sartori - "I would contend that the O/C passed away in
AD70 and the N/C commenced in AD70, at the destruction of Jerusalem.
" (Magi Forum -http://jaygary.com/starof2000/discus/messages/1/1.html)
Ed Stevens -
"That 40-year period between
Pentecost and Holocaust was just a transition phase between “this
age” and “the age about to come.” It is “the age about to come” that
was to be the eternal one. We have several examples of 40-year
transitional periods in the OT (wilderness wandering, David’s reign,
etc.). According to Moses and the prophets the transition between
the two ages was not supposed to be eternal, nor even a long
protracted period." (Stevens Responds to
Gentry)
"At AD70, Jesus returned and ended the last days of the Jewish
nation. It was God's Great and Glorious Day for the
vindication of His people, and an awesome day of judgment and
destruction for those who had rejected and crucified Jesus.. The
last days of the Jewish nation ended then. A new age had
begun." (What Happened in AD70?, p. 29)
B. The
New Covenant Age ("The Age to Come") was initiated in AD30,
but not completed Until AD70
William Bell - "The
"present time" denotes a "then present" period of transition from
the Old to the New Covenant. This did not occur instantaneously at
Pentecost (A.D.33) but gradually within the framework of the Cross -
A.D.70 time frame" (Illusion of Conclusion)
New Earth Christian Studies -
"If they were looking forward
to something, waiting eagerly for it, then they did not yet possess
it in its fullness. And yet, there was always a sense in which they
already owned it. They had the down payment. It was not that the New
Covenant had not yet begun: It had, but it was not in full effect,
until the Old Covenant was utterly destroyed."
(God's Promises Fulfilled)
Don Preston
"We thus have the passing of one world and the
anticipation of another. The Old World is the Old Covenant World of Israel
that anticipated and predicted the coming of the Messiah — these predictions
were part of the elements, the first principles of Christ. The New World,
the World to come, was initiated by the passion of Jesus and his work of
atonement. The perfection of that atoning work would be his parousia
(Hebrews 9:28)." (The Passing of the Elements)
"If they were looking
forward to something, waiting eagerly for it, then they did not yet
possess it in its fullness. And yet, there was always a sense in which they
already owned it. They had the down payment. It was not that the New
Covenant had not yet begun: It had, but it was not in full effect,
until the Old Covenant was utterly destroyed. The Christians of the time were in a unique position:
They were living not just between covenants, but in the end times of
the Old Covenant which coincided with the beginning of the New."
(God's Promises Fulfilled) - So
which is it, AD30 or AD70 !? Can't be both.
Or is there a THIRD AGE ("This Age to Come")?
D.
The END of the New Covenant Age
("The Age to Come") was in AD70
"I
don't think the old covenant ceased at the cross of Christ. It was
done at the destruction of Jerusalem. After the cross, its began to
fade away as we've seen in the book of Hebrews. The new covenant
began on the Day of Pentecost which the saints were filled with the
holy spirit and Christ was their King. Now, this may be an
interesting part, the judgment began at 66 AD when the saints were
"raised" and "received" the thrones of kingdom with the parousia of
Christ at that time, not 70 AD yet. See Rev. 11:15-19; Matt. 19:28;
and Luke 22:30. The old covenant
and the new covenant were overlaping during 30-70 AD. It seems that
BOTH WERE ENDED at 70 AD.
When all things (the judgment, the enemies, the resurrection, the
kingdom, the death, the covenants, and the Law) that were subjected
to him, he delivered up to his God (Yahweh) the Father which He may
be all in all. (Cite)
When Was the
Church Established ? AD30, AD70, or Both ?
A. Preston: The Church Was Not Established at Pentecost
Don Preston
"A key point of controversy
surrounding the Preterist view of eschatology is the contention that
the church/kingdom was not fully established on Pentecost but
was in a state of incompletion until the Old World was taken out of
the way in A.D.70. Every anti-Preterist which this writer has read
or heard has made a major issue over this point. It would seem that
this issue is one which our opponents believe is dangerous, and
evidently they believe it easy to refute. As we shall seek to
demonstrate, however, it is not the Preterist that has a problem
with this issue, it is the one who holds to the traditional concept
of eschatology; and especially in regard to the miraculous work of
the Holy Spirit. (A Full Grown Baby?)
B. Preston: The Church
Was Established at Pentecost
Don Preston
"We are not here arguing that the kingdom was not established on Pentecost. We do aver it
was established in infancy." (An Airtight Argument)
When Was the
Resurrection? Was it in AD30, Was it in AD70, or Both?
A. AD30: The Resurrection Began in AD30 and Ended in AD70
William Bell - "It is transparent that Paul has pointed the direction of the Philippians upward, eagerly looking for the Savior who would
complete the resurrection already in progress, v.11. ."
(Phil. 4:5 Spatiology or Eschatology?)
B. AD70: The
Resurrection Was Solely in AD70
Max R. King - "This captivity was symbolic of the captive state of the New Testament saints during the last days of fleshly Israel. They were oppressed and persecuted until the very end of that second Babylon (I Thess. 2:14-16). The fall of Babylon (Israel) and the resurrection of the saints to their homeland, the new heaven and earth, are the basic theme of God's final revelation to man. As with national Israel in ancient Babylon,
the release or deliverance of the saints from Israel (Babylon) was
the opening of the graves and the bringing forth of all into
judgment," (The Spirit of Prophecy, p. 219).
C. AD30 and 70: The Resurrection Was in Progress, But Wasn't
Attained Until AD70
William Bell - "In
chapter 3, Paul speaks of attaining to the resurrection of
the dead, v.11, which equates with being made perfect (telios), and obtaining the prize of the high calling, (Phil.3:12,14; Eph.4:13). Finally, after another reference to the destruction of Jewish adversaries, whose hope was in their fleshly status and circumcision, (3:1-6); whose righteousness was derived from the works of the law, (v.9); and whose mind was on the earthly things or commonwealth of Jerusalem, its temple and sacrifices, etc., (v.19), Paul looks up with his affections set on the heavenly things above (Col.3:1,2), and declares, "For our citizenship is in heaven, from which also we eagerly wait for a Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ; who will transform the body of our humble state into conformity with the body of His glory, by the exertion of the power that He has even to subject all things to Himself" (Phil.3:20,21). It is transparent that Paul has pointed the direction of the Philippians upward, eagerly looking for the Savior who would
complete the resurrection already in progress, v.11. ."
(Phil. 4:5 Spatiology or Eschatology?)
When is the Bodily
Resurrection? AD70 or in the future, after Death? Or Two
Different Resurrections of the Just?
A. The Resurrection is in
the Future, After Physical Death (Wouldn't This by HYPO-Preterism??)
Jessie Mills
- "Since Christ has already
returned, believers now receive their new bodies immediately at
death." (Revelation Survey, p. 168)
B. The Resurrection was
in AD70
Jessie Mills
- "The dead in Hades (sheol) were
indeed disembodied while waiting for Christ's return. At
Christ's return, the dead in the unseen realm of Hades were raised
out of Hades and given their new immortal bodies that had been
reserved for them." (Revelation Survey, p. 168)
When the Gospel
Start / Cease?
A. Paul's Gospel
Didn't Apply to the Pre-AD70 World
William Bell
- "If Demas forsook Paul for the
present age (alleged Christian age) then in what age did that leave
Paul? Not the Jewish age if it passed away at the cross. Not the
"age to come," since it is argued to be yet future. Can we attribute the present
age to which Demas apostatized as the age which Christ came to establish?
Does not this passage show clearly that the
gospel which Paul held firmly till his death (2 Timothy 4:6-8) did not
belong to the "present age" of scripture? What
a bind we all are in today if loving the Christian age is apostasy." (This
Present Evil Age)
B.
Paul's Gospel
Applied ONLY to the Pre-AD70 World
When Was The
Judgment Of "All Men" ?
A. The Judgment of "All
Men" was in AD70
William Bell - "Having died in
faith, they were yet (about A.D. 64) awaiting the promise of
resurrection into the eternal kingdom, (Heb.11:39-40). Although the
time was then future, it was not in the far distant future for the
city for which they looked was about to come, (Heb.13:14), and was
said to be at hand, (Rev.1:1,3; 21:2)." (The Dead Are Raised)
"Similarly, the resurrection of saints from hades and the change of the "living" as far as we know, was not perceivable to the physical eye. The limits of physical observation do not deny, disprove, or otherwise negate the clear teachings of scripture that the resurrection occurred in 70 A.D., in connection with the fall of Jerusalem
" (Challenging Concepts of the Resurrection)
"The time of
this judgment equals the time that the patriarchs as well as the saints from
the east, west, north and south sit down or inherit the kingdom and
corresponds with their resurrection.
Jesus speaks of the gathering of the elect from the four winds during the fall of Jerusalem in 70 A.D."
(Illusion of Conclusion)
David Curtis -" The destruction of Jerusalem evidenced Jesus' coming in the clouds for that historical group of people. But are we to see it only as a coming in judgement on Israel? The full preterist or consistent preterist sees this judgement coming on Israel as the second advent of Christ. Jesus said that he would come in the lifetime of his disciples not just to judge Israel but: he said he would come in the glory of His father, with His angels, to reward
every man. At Christ's coming he was to judge the wicked and reward the righteous, and it was to happen quickly. In the parable of the tares in Matthew 13 we see that the judgement of the wicked and the reward of the righteous happen at the same time."
(The Book of Revelation)
Stephen Douglas -
"At the time of the emptying of Sheol as a result of the judgment
in AD 70, the living and the those who had died before that time
were judged based on their faithfulness to God." (undeception.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/common-objections-to-full-preterism-below-the-surface/#comments)
Max R. King - "This captivity was symbolic of the captive state of the New Testament saints during the last days of fleshly Israel. They were oppressed and persecuted until the very end of that second Babylon (I Thess. 2:14-16). The fall of Babylon (Israel) and the resurrection of the saints to their homeland, the new heaven and earth, are the basic theme of God's final revelation to man. As with national Israel in ancient Babylon, the release or deliverance of the saints from Israel (Babylon) was the opening of the graves and the bringing forth of all into judgment," (The Spirit of Prophecy, p. 219).
Don Preston - "We
are convinced the only construct of Mark 8:38-9:1 and parallels
which satisfies the chronological and contextual demands is to
understand Jesus predicting his return in full glory to judge all
men... This happened in 70 A.D. when he destroyed Jerusalem"
(An Airtight Argument)
B. The Judgment of "All
Men" was a Process Completed in AD70
William Bell - "It is transparent that Paul has pointed the direction of the Philippians upward, eagerly looking for the Savior who would complete the resurrection already in progress, v.11. Clearly, the expectation of the Parousia
is in full focus." (Philippians 4:5 - Spatiology or Eschatology)
Who Was Judged
("All Men") in AD70 ?
A. The Living and the Dead Before That Time
William Bell
- "In addition, it is not without significance that this
gathering of the saints in Matt.24:31, is preceded by the great sound or
voice (marginal rendering) of a trumpet. Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob heard
"this" trumpet. It therefore signaled the universal gathering of saints from
the uttermost part of the earth to the uttermost part of heaven, (Mk.13:27;
2 Thess.2:1; Heb.10:25), as well as the raising of the patriarchs and
prophets from the dead, (Rom.4:16; Heb.11:39-40). This can be none other
than the trump of God of 1 Thess.4:16, and the last trump of 1 Cor.15:52.
If not, then do the scriptures teach two separate gatherings preceded by two
universal trumpets? Why make them all the more confusing (a fact evidenced
by the attempt to divide Matthew 24), by placing them both at a coming of
Christ, a consummation of an age, a gathering together of the elect in the
clouds, and an inheriting of the kingdom, (Matt.8:11-12, 24:3, 30-31, 34; 1
Cor.15:23-24, 50-52; 1 Thess.4:14-17)? It should be readily apparent that
the trumpet is one and the same. Equally
certain is the fact that Matthew 24 places the sounding of that trumpet at
the fall of Jerusalem in A.D. 70, before that first-century generation
passed, (Matt.24:31,34). " (The Dead Are Raised)
Stephen Douglas -
"At the time of the emptying of Sheol as a result of the judgment
in AD 70, the living and the those who had died before that time
were judged based on their faithfulness to God." (undeception.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/common-objections-to-full-preterism-below-the-surface/#comments)
B. Fleshly Israel"
William Bell
- "The parable of
the tares likewise expressed the difficulty of determining the
tares (fleshly Israel) from the wheat (spiritual Israel or sons
of God), during the pre-end-of-the-age transition which was
consummated in A.D.70, (Mt.13:29,30; 37-40)." (Illusion of
Conclusion)
When Did
Supernatural Power of Evil Cease ? Was it in AD30, Was it in
AD70, or Both?
A. Supernatural
Powers of Evil Ceased in AD70
William Bell -
"It also explains the cessation of demon possession and the
supernatural powers of evil spirits which were independent of
apostles' hands or disciples' vital signs. The cessation of prophecy
and demon possession was linked to the fulfillment of old testament
prophecy." (When
Did Miracles Cease)
David Curtis -
"Their father was the devil, the god of the Jewish age. Satan
held them in bondage through the law. They were the physical seed of
Abraham but not the true seed of Abraham." (Israel of God)
Jessie Mills -
"Satan has already been given his kingdom in the lake of fire, and
he no longer walks up and down, to and fro, seeking whom he may
devour. His powers are curtailed.. Christ is now ruler of the
this world." (Revelation Survey, p. 256)
"Nero declared war on Israel Feb 10 AD67. After the judgment of
Rev. 20:4 Satan was loosed for a short period and when he
accomplished God's will he was cast into the lake of fire. So
at the most 4 months would fulfil those events in the this time
frame. See Luke 21:20-22." (Revelation Survey, p. 163)
Don Preston
- "But Jesus comes in judgment on that apostate city and destroys
her. In chapter 20 judgment is set, Satan is cast into the lake of
fire; and Jesus takes his glorious bride unto himself! This all
happened in 70 AD with the full destruction of the Theocracy of
Israel, the persecuting city of Jerusalem, the Old Heavens and
Earth. The New Creation is complete--what Satan had succeeded in
getting man to forfeit, communion with God and eternal life, is
restored. Satan lost — God finished His work." (The Binding of
Satan)
B. Supernatural
Powers of Evil Ceased in AD30
Dan Harden -“Yes
the effect of human sin is sufficient to account for all of the
horrible expressions of wickedness that we see in our world today.
We find little excuse to blame Satan for the evil about us. Christ
has tied up the strong one and plundered his house”
The Seventieth
Week of Daniel - AD30s or AD70s ?
A. The Seventieth Week was
in the AD30s.
Jessie Mills -
"Therefore we see the balance of the last 'week' beginning when
the Holy Spirit is poured out upon the twelve (Pentecost), and the
teaching of Christ goes forth." (Daniel's Fulfilled Prophecy,
p. 149)
The
Christianity of the Bible Not the Christianity of Post AD70 World Dan Harden -
“The Great Commission was a special
time of inspired Apostolic activity that will never be repeated”
William Bell -
"The confirmation or
proof of the apostles' inspiration and miraculous power was their
very ability to confer or impart miraculous gifts to believers
through the laying on of their hands, (Acts 6:5,6; 8:17,18; 19:6; II
Tim. 1:6). It is important, however, that one take into
consideration the time frame of what is taught in Mk. 16:17-18."
The Lord was "with" the apostles in the "miraculous" confirmation of
the word. Matthew's account of the great commission affirms the
same. "Teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age,
(Mt. 28:20, NASV). Is one to suppose that the Lord miraculously confirmed the apostles' preaching but not their teaching? Was he not "with" them in their teaching in the same way? Here, then, is the Lord promising to guide the apostles in inspiration and to confirm their words through imparting signs through them until the END OF THE AGE!
This is the Jewish age which lasted until 70 A.D." (When Did Miracles Cease?)
"Paul states that the gift of inspiration to apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, and teachers would continue till "we all come to the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect (full-grown) man, (Eph. 4:11-14). It has been demonstrated that the full-grown man (perfect) state is equivalent in meaning and time to "when that which is perfect is come," and the "face to face" presence of Christ, (1 Cor. 13:8-12; Rev. 22:4). Things equal to the same thing are equal to one another. Therefore the "unity of the faith" equals to the "face to face" presence in the revelation of Jesus Christ at the end of the Jewish age.
New Earth Christian Studies -
"It was not that the New
Covenant had not yet begun: It had, but it was not in full effect,
until the Old Covenant was utterly destroyed. They were free of it's
burden of slavery, but until the first tabernacle was removed, the
way into the Holy Place and complete access to God was not
disclosed. The Christians of the time were in a unique position:
They were living not just between covenants, but in the end times of
the Old Covenant which coincided with the beginning of the New."
(God's Promises Fulfilled)
Michael Sartori "Is the church (in it's current traditional
format) really how it is supposed to be? As a Full Preterist I tend
to believe the church set up / government as established in the N/T
was for a transitional period, from AD 30 to AD70." (Magi Forum -
http://jaygary.com/starof2000/discus/messages/1/1.html)
"Miracles were still in use to confirm Jesus'
teaching and authority and the Old Covenant had not yet passed away
(Hebrews 8:13). The church still needed pastors, elders, shepherds
etc. to enable the transition to run smoothly. " (Magi Forum
-http://jaygary.com/starof2000/discus/messages/1/1.html)
Ed Stevens -
"That 40-year period between
Pentecost and Holocaust was just a transition phase
between “this age” and “the age about to come.” It is “the age about to come” that
was to be the eternal one. We have several examples of 40-year
transitional periods in the OT (wilderness wandering, David’s reign,
etc.). According to Moses and the prophets the transition between
the two ages was not supposed to be eternal, nor even a long
protracted period." (Stevens Responds to
Gentry)
The Cross
Incomplete for Salvation / Eternal Life - AD70 Mandatory
William Bell -
"Entrance into the Most Holy is a
blessing of the "age to come." Entrance was opened up at the fall of the
temple. Therefore, the blessings of the "age to come" were opened up or
received at the fall of the temple, specifically ETERNAL LIFE! When exegetes
quit dividing Matthew and begin "rightly dividing" the word on biblical
eschatology, eternal life will be seen in Matthew where it is seen in
Hebrews, in A.D.70, at the fall of the temple and Jewish commonwealth. In
fact, this is where it will be seen throughout all the holy scriptures."
(This Present Evil Age)
"If that redemption were "completed" at the cross or on the day of
Pentecost, then miraculous gifts were a useless commodity to the
church as it relates to the same. Further proof that the redemption
was not complete was the "futurity" of the inheritance which would
be received at the second coming.. The completion of that redemption
was clearly future at the time of the writing of Ephesians, about
A.D. 58, though not removed from that first-century generation..
Therefore, the redemption of the purchased possession was completed
in A.D. 70, at the fall of Jerusalem which corresponds in time to
the end of the Jewish age and coming or parousia of Christ. This was
the "day of redemption" and the termination of the "earnest" or
miraculous gifts." (When
Did Miracles Cease)
"When was that redemption completed? This is vital to an
understanding of when those gifts would cease. Paul writes, "And
grieve not the Holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the
day of redemption, (Eph. 4:30)." (When
Did Miracles Cease)
Don Preston "The process (and ground)
of taking away of sin undoubtedly began at the Cross, as Hebrews
9:26 affirms. It was not
perfected and
completed there, however."
(eschatology.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=477&Itemid=61)
"The New Day fully
came in 70 AD when Jesus
returned in judgment of the Old World of Darkness and brought the
New Day of Salvation. The Day has come." (The Day Has Come)
Death Was
Swallowed Up in AD70
Virgil Vaduva
- "That is why in 1 Corinthians 15, Paul can happily say "Where, O
death is your victory? Where, O death is your sting?" He
is not talking about physical death but spiritual death because he
specifies sin and Jesus' victory over spiritual death in the very
next verse: "The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the
law. But thanks be to God! He gives us the victory
through our Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus conquered death and
reunited us with God." (Answer to Gromacki)
"The Law"
and the "Power of Sin" Was
Utterly Removed in AD70
Don Preston -
"I find it impossible to escape
the conclusion that either the Great Trumpet of the Lord sounded in
that first century generation or Jesus' promise failed and man still
has no escape from sin, from separation from God. The Good News is,
the Trumpet sounded and the final barriers between God and man were
removed as God took away the last vestiges of "the law" which held
the "power of sin." Man can now be fully justified and live in full
assurance that "he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me,
has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed
out of death into life" (John 5:24). Thank God for the sounding of
the Great Trumpet!" (With The Sounding of the Trumpet)
Kurt Simmons -
The Attack on Full Preterism: Which
Death Was Defeated in AD70?
- "Covenant
Eschatology: Inherently Universalistic"
The evidence is
in: full Preterism is not the culprit linking Preterism to
Universalism. The real culprits are false notions regarding the
source and nature of mankind’s condemnation and his corporate
justification as articulated by some in the Preterist community.
Reformed Preterists, like Frost, interpret the “death” cast into the
lake of fire in Rev. 20:14 as imputed Adamic guilt. King, on
the other hand, equates it with annulment of the Mosaic law.
Because these are universal in terms of their asserted condemnation,
their destruction works universal justification, apart from faith
and obedience. As they unconditionally condemned, so their annulment
unconditionally justifies. It is as if the whole race were arraigned
before the court of heaven upon an indictment reciting these two
laws. The annulment of those laws ipso facto destroys the
indictment, as there is no longer any law to base an accusation
upon. Hence, all men stand acquitted. In the words of Sam Frost:
“There is no law taking into account our
sins.”
The Creation
Which Was Groaning Was Old Covenant Israel
William Bell - "We
submit then, that the "creation" of Romans 8:18-23, is a reference
to O.T. saints who, under the law, were in the bondage of corruption of sin-death, yet waiting/groaning in pain to be delivered from that bondage when the firstfruits (N.T. saints) were manifested or received the adoption of sons. It is not necessary to exclude Gentiles from the "whole creation" of Romans 8. (See The Cross And The Parousia Of Christ, by Max R. King, pp. 525-526). The time of fulfillment is the completion of the work of the
eschatological Spirit at the end of the Jewish age in A.D. 70..
Finally, the identity of the creation harmonizes with
Old Covenant Israel as rational, intelligent mankind who were in need of
deliverance - real deliverance from the bondage
of real sin-death, and this through the death, burial, and resurrection of
Christ." (The Illusion of the Conclusion)
Old Covenant
Israel Was Delivered From the Bondage of Sin-Death in AD70
William Bell - "Old Covenant Israel must be introduced into the equation as consideration of the creation in Romans 8. There was a real need to deliver them from the bondage of sin-death.
Christ took on the nature of his brethren (Old Covenant Israel) that he might suffer sin-death with them in order to destroy the power of Satan and subsequently deliver his brethren from that bondage..
There was, therefore, a real need for Christ to deliver his brethren (O.T. Israel) from the power of sin death, a bondage to which they had become subject, "not willingly," i.e., not of their own choice but by God's placing them under the law which could not give the life (Gal.3:21), and the freedom from sin and death (Heb.10:4), which they desired. This could only be accomplished through Christ by means of his death and the outpouring of the eschatological Spirit during his age-ending reign, (1 Cor.15:24-26).
..
There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, AND SHALL TURN AWAY UNGODLINESS FROM JACOB; FOR THIS IS MY COVENANT UNTO THEM WHEN I SHALL TAKE AWAY THEIR (O.T. ISRAEL'S) SINS," (Rom.11:26,27; 13:11,12)."
(The Illusion of the Conclusion)
The New
Heavens and Earth Entered the World in AD70
David
Curtis -
"We dwell in the New
Jerusalem in the very presence of God and the invitation is still
going out today. Notice the invitation that goes forth from the New
Heaven and Earth" (Gospel Preached to All the World?)
Jessie Mills -
"By destroying the Jewish State
and sending the gospel of Christ throughout the Gentile world, He
'will reign for ever and ever'. Time without end. Yet
some today are teaching that the end of the world is just ahead.
They say it will soon burn to ashes, thus destroying the kingdom
where Christ was to reign 'for ever and ever'." (Revelation
Survey, p. 157)
The
Consummation of the Ages Was in AD70
William Bell
- "Jesus spoke of the
consummation of an age concurrent with Jerusalem's fall in A.D.70.." (This
Present Evil Age)
AD70 Was The
Goal of the New Testament
William Bell
- "The
goal of New Covenant saints was the revealing of sons which equals
receiving the adoption of sons/redemption of the body. This is
placed opposite to deliverance from the bondage/slavery of
corruption, a state from which New covenant saints were already
being delivered though it had not yet reached consummation as Paul
argues. " (The Illusion of the Conclusion)
The
"Unity of the Faith" Came in AD70
William Bell -
"Fifth,
Paul states that the gift of inspiration to apostles, prophets,
evangelists, pastors, and teachers would continue till "we all come
to the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God,
unto a perfect (full-grown) man, (Eph. 4:11-14). It has been
demonstrated that the full-grown man (perfect) state is equivalent
in meaning and time to "when that which is perfect is come," and the
"face to face" presence of Christ, (1 Cor. 13:8-12; Rev. 22:4).
Things equal to the same thing are equal to one another. Therefore
the "unity of the faith" equals to the "face to face" presence in
the revelation of Jesus Christ at the end of the Jewish age. "
(When
Did Miracles Cease)
Miracles
Ceased in AD70
William Bell - "Miracles
were to last until the completion or end of the Jewish age..
Therefore, the scriptures limit the termination of miracles to the
end of the Jewish age in 70 A.D.." (When
Did Miracles Cease)
"If that redemption were "completed" at the cross or on the day of
Pentecost, then miraculous gifts were a useless commodity to the
church as it relates to the same. Further proof that the redemption
was not complete was the "futurity" of the inheritance which would
be received at the second coming.. The completion of that redemption
was clearly future at the time of the writing of Ephesians, about
A.D. 58, though not removed from that first-century generation..
Therefore, the redemption of the purchased possession was completed
in A.D. 70, at the fall of Jerusalem which corresponds in time to
the end of the Jewish age and coming or parousia of Christ. This was
the "day of redemption" and the termination of the "earnest" or
miraculous gifts." (When
Did Miracles Cease)
Michael Sartori - "Miracles were still in use to confirm Jesus'
teaching and authority and the Old Covenant had not yet passed away
(Hebrews 8:13). The church still needed pastors, elders, shepherds
etc. to enable the transition to run smoothly. " (Magi Forum
-http://jaygary.com/starof2000/discus/messages/1/1.html)
Spiritual
Gifts Ceased in AD70
David Curtis
"When that time arrived in AD 70, there was no longer a need for
spiritual gifts." (The Permanence of Love)
The Work of
the Holy Spirit Ceased in AD70
William Bell -
"When was that redemption completed? This is vital to an
understanding of when those gifts would cease. Paul writes, "And
grieve not the Holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the
day of redemption, (Eph. 4:30)." (When
Did Miracles Cease)
"Second,
the bodies in this context were only those of Christians who were
physically alive.
Third, the indwelling of these bodies was by a "then present" (A.D.57)
miraculous indwelling of the Spirit whose "completed" work was future but
not removed from the age of the miraculous -- by His Spirit that indwells you."
(Challenging Concept of the Resurrection)
Heaven Didn't
Exist Until AD70
Virgil Vaduva
- "Since heaven would not exist until the return of Christ, all the
dead in Christ would be required to go to Hades, not heaven."
(Answer to Gromacki)
The Great
Trumpet Sounded in AD70
William Bell - "
In addition, it is not without significance that this
gathering of the saints in Matt.24:31, is preceded by the great sound or
voice (marginal rendering) of a trumpet. Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob heard
"this" trumpet.. Equally
certain is the fact that Matthew 24 places the sounding of that trumpet at
the fall of Jerusalem in A.D. 70, before that first-century generation
passed, (Matt.24:31,34)." (The Dead Are Raised)
Don Preston -
"I find it impossible to escape
the conclusion that either the Great Trumpet of the Lord sounded in
that first century generation or Jesus' promise failed and man still
has no escape from sin, from separation from God.. Thank God for the
sounding of the Great Trumpet!" (With The Sounding of the Trumpet)
Universal
Acknowledgement of Christ's Sovereignty Came in AD70
William Bell - "In
chapter 2, reference again to judgment, v.10. The reference
does not appear as clear, but when paralleled with Rom.14:10 and
Rev.5:13, that judgment and
universal acknowledgment of Christ's sovereignty was at hand (Rev.1:1-3). They were again exhorted in view of the day (Parousia) of Christ, (Phil.2:16)."
(Philippians 4:5 - Spatiology or Eschatology)
The Gathering
From the Four Winds Was During the Fall of Jerusalem
William Bell - "
Jesus speaks of the gathering of the elect from the four winds during the fall of Jerusalem in 70 A.D.. In addition, it is not without significance that this gathering of
the saints in Matt.24:31, is preceded by the great sound or voice
(marginal rendering) of a trumpet. Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob heard
"this" trumpet. It therefore signaled the universal gathering of
saints from the uttermost part of the earth to the uttermost part of
heaven, (Mk.13:27; 2 Thess.2:1; Heb.10:25), as well as the raising
of the patriarchs and prophets from the dead, (Rom.4:16;
Heb.11:39-40).. Equally
certain is the fact that Matthew 24 places the sounding of that trumpet at
the fall of Jerusalem in A.D. 70, before that first-century generation
passed, (Matt.24:31,34). " (The Dead Are Raised)
That Which is
Perfect Came in AD70 at the Second Coming
William Bell -
"Therefore, seeing face to face which is equal to the coming of the
perfect in the Corinthian text, is equal in time to "seeing His
face" in the New Jerusalem at the second coming. It is the full
open-faced, unmirorred revelation or unveiling of God's glory in
Christ, a glory that was ready to be (about to be) revealed in the
apostles' own generation..
Lastly, the end of the age, the
revelation or day of Christ, the full-grown man, the coming of the
perfect, seeing "face to face," the redemption of the purchased
possession, receiving the inheritance, and the unity of the faith
are all equivalents in time and meaning having occurred in 70 A.D.
with the fall of Jerusalem" (When
Did Miracles Cease)
David Curtis
"That which is perfect refers to
the maturity of the body at the rapture of the church, which
happened at the second coming of Christ, bringing in the New Heavens
and New Earth which closed the cannon. This all took place in AD 70,
when the Lord returned, bringing in the New Heaven and Earth where
we see Him face to face. So the coming again of our Lord for his
people brought them to full maturity. " (The Permanence of Love)
Hades Was
Destroyed in AD70
William Bell -
"Hades has been
destroyed. " (The Dead Are Raised)
The World
Entered the Eternal Age in AD70
William Bell - "Many writers express this viewpoint largely because they see the
"age to come" as heaven."
Ed Stevens -
"That 40-year period between
Pentecost and Holocaust was just a transition phase between “this
age” and “the age about to come.” It is “the age about to come” that
was to be the eternal one. We have several examples of 40-year
transitional periods in the OT (wilderness wandering, David’s reign,
etc.). According to Moses and the prophets the transition between
the two ages was not supposed to be eternal, nor even a long
protracted period. Gentry has missed the significance of the
transition period, and confused the passages about the transition
period with those about the eternal kingdom." (Stevens Responds to
Gentry)
Don Preston - "This New World was consummated when God
destroyed his old people, Isaiah 65:13ff, the Old Jerusalem; the Old
Heavens and Earth of Judaism, Isaiah 51:15-16; bringing to a close
the Old World (Age, Matthew 24:3) and bringing to glorious
perfection, 1 Cor. 13:8, the New World. That time was when Jesus
returned and destroyed the capital and hub of the Old World,
Jerusalem, in A.D. 70." (More On No Death, No Sorrow, No Pain)
The
"Kingdom Come" Part of the Lord's Prayer No Longer Proper
William Bell -
"For example, if one were to fail to consider the time statements and facts found in other passages, the kingdom could be taught as yet future. Jesus taught the disciples to pray, "Thy kingdom come" (Matt.6:10). At the time those words were spoken, the kingdom was clearly future and therefore the propriety of praying for its arrival.
" (The Parousia and Acts 1:11)
The Great
Commission Was Fulfilled in AD70
Dan Harden -
“The Great Commission was a special
time of inspired Apostolic activity that will never be repeated”
Faith, Hope
and Desire Was Fulfilled in AD70
David Curtis -
“Our hope and desire has been realized in the second coming of Christ, the tabernacle of God is with men, He dwells with us. We live in the glories of the New Covenant age."
(Theme of Revelation)
|
![]() |
Walt Hibbard |
| "When I saw that Ken framed his paper around such emotionally-charged words as "hyper-preterism," "heterodox," "failure," "errors," etc., I was disappointed. Such language has the effect of discouraging bright young students of the Scriptures from pursuing advanced eschatological studies which may take them beyond the generally accepted creedal formulations." (A Response to Ken Gentry) |
![]() |
Mike Sullivan |
|
"Gentry, Mathison, and North use the "Hyper-Preterist" slur, because they too are very close to crossing the creedal line of their denominations. They also know we make them look really bad to the objective reader because we expose the arbitrary and inconsistent nature of their hermeneutics. So they use "spoofing" and scare tactics and duck debates etc." (PretCosmos Yahoo Group) |
|
Jared Coleman - Why delectatio Dei? "Lately I have come to really hate the word 'preterist' .. the word focuses on looking backward at a time when I am focused on looking forward (not without looking backward as well, of course). And third, while I still read many of the eschatological passages of scripture in a very similar (though in many cases not the same) way as others in that community, the language of the preterist community is woefully deficient and unless it changes it will never be able to project an adequate picture of the kingdom of God. That last statement is pretty strong, but I believe it just that strongly. Many of you may already agree and so I'm not going to list the reasons here, but if any of my preterist friends want to talk about it we can discuss it in the comments. So, I am not going to use this word to describe myself anymore."
|
James Stuart Russell's "Gospel Universalism" Conclusion to The Parousia "That favoured apostle who more than any other seems to have comprehended ‘the breadth, and length, and depth, and height of the love of Christ,’ suggests to us ideas of the extent and efficiency of the great redemption which our latent incredulity can scarcely receive. " (UP: Added "Gospel Universalism" as new category of Universalist-Preterism : "a reign of truth and righteousness on the earth" in the future ; "This world belongs no more to the devil, but to God. Christ has redeemed it, and will recover it, and draw all men unto Him.") UP: Kurt Simmons - The Attack on Full Preterism: Which Death Was Defeated in AD70? - "As we have already seen, the essential tenant of Universalism is the corporate justification of man irrespective of faith or obedience. King’s “transformed cosmology” clearly holds the germ of Universalism: Salvation “is cosmic and corporate, not individual and limited.” "Covenant Eschatology: Inherently Universalistic" The evidence is in: full Preterism is not the culprit linking Preterism to Universalism. The real culprits are false notions regarding the source and nature of mankind’s condemnation and his corporate justification as articulated by some in the Preterist community. Reformed Preterists, like Frost, interpret the “death” cast into the lake of fire in Rev. 20:14 as imputed Adamic guilt. King, on the other hand, equates it with annulment of the Mosaic law. 36 Because these are universal in terms of their asserted condemnation, their destruction works universal justification, apart from faith and obedience. As they unconditionally condemned, so their annulment unconditionally justifies. It is as if the whole race were arraigned before the court of heaven upon an indictment reciting these two laws. The annulment of those laws ipso facto destroys the indictment, as there is no longer any law to base an accusation upon. Hence, all men stand acquitted. In the words of Sam Frost: “There is no law taking into account our sins.”
|
||
|
LIMITED ATONEMENT FULL PRETERISTS |
UNLIMITED ATONEMENT: FULL PRETERIST UNIVERSALISM |
|
|
|
|
On "Full Preterism"
Jay
Adams (2003)
"Frost goes on to write, "If the Second Coming really did occur in
A.D.70, does this damage the integrity of the church, he history and her
claim to know the truth?" The (Orthodox Preterist) answer?
Absolutely. The vast majority of biblical exegetes have
clearly taught the doctrines that (Unorthodox Preterists) reject.
If UPs are correct, it would mean that the Bible-believing church would
have been deluded or deceived for most of its history, and Christians
would have truly entertained a "misplaced hope." (Preterism: Orthodox or
Unorthodox, pp. 2,3)
"Because UPs are right in many of their interpretations, and because in these they have good exegesis on their side, they have become cocky about the interpretation of other passages in which they show shoddy and forced exegesis to support untenable teachings." (Preterism: Orthodox or Unorthodox, p. 4)
Kenneth Gentry
"("Hyper" Preterism)...goes too far by extending valid observations gathered from temporally confined judgment passages (texts including such delimitations as soon and at hand) to passages that are not temporally constrained and that actually prophesy the future advent of Christ." (Tabletalk magazine, January 1999, p.56)
"Before I begin my analysis and critique, however, I must make very clear my orthodox convictions regarding biblical eschatology. I pause to do so because a new, unorthodox movement has arisen that confuses many Christians regarding orthodox preterism. This new movement largely arises from within Church of Christ (Campbellite) circles; indeed, the two main publishing sources of the movement are run by present or former Campbellites (though, like any good cult-like movement, it is widening its net and drawing followers from other sources). This movement asserts that A.D. 70 witnesses the fulfilling of ALL eschatological prophecy. This mutant form of preterism goes too far, for it denies a future Second Advent of Christ; a future, bodily resurrection of the dead; and other historic, orthodox doctrines of the Christian faith." (An Introductory Disclaimer)
"Unfortunately, a new gnosticism is infecting the church: hyper-preterism. One major feature of hyper-preterism is its denial of a future physical resurrection of the believer at the end of history. As we shall see, this contradicts a major result of the resurrection of Christ. Before I demonstrate this, I must briefly summarize the argument for Christ's physical resurrection, which is the effective cause of our own future resurrection. " (Christ's Resurrection and ours)
Kenneth L. Gentry Jr.
"First, hyper-preterism is heterodox. It is outside the creedal orthodoxy of
Christianity. No creed allows any second Advent in A. D. 70. No creed allows any
other type of resurrection than a bodily one. Historic creeds speak of the
universal, personal judgment of all men, not of a representative judgment in A.
D. 70. It would be most remarkable if the entire church that came through A. D.
70 missed the proper understanding of the eschaton and did not realize its
members had been resurrected! And that the next generations had no inkling of
the great transformation that took place! Has the entire Christian church missed
the basic contours of Christian eschatology for its first 1900 years?" (Brief
Theologial Analysis of Hyper-Preterism)
Scott Hahn
"I was originally attracted by Max King and J. S. Russell, but subsequently rejected their view that 70 AD exhaustively fulfills NT prophecy. Personally, I have come to conclude that the main error of "hyper-preterism" is based on the common failure to recognize the theological significance of the biblical (and ancient Jewish) view of Israel's temple as a "microcosm" (i.e., the cosmos in miniature), which implies that the cosmos itself was seen as a "macro-temple" (see Ps 104, Job 38). Accordingly, the divinely decreed destruction of the Jerusalem (microcosmic) temple was itself a typological event, one that foreshadows the future destruction of the cosmos (i.e., as macro-temple). The destruction of the Jerusalem temple is thus a true -- but partial -- fulfillment, which implies a partial non-fulfillment, thus pointing to a still greater fulfillment in the future, when the cosmos undergoes the same divinely decreed destruction as the Jerusalem temple.
An integral interpretation of NT prophetic texts is rooted in the scriptural view of creation, set forth in terms of temple typology (see Hebrews 9:1-12). What happens to the temple must eventually happen to the cosmos; the resurrected body of Christ is the New Temple, which will be fully manifested in glory only when the old cosmos undergoes the same transformative judgement
of God, thus bringing forth a New Creation -- which the Apocalypse rightly
describes as the Divine Temple (Rev. 11:18ff) of the New Jerusalem (Rev.
21:22)." (comments, ca-anathema, 2003)
Tommy Ice
"EXTREME preterists, or consistent preterists, as they prefer to be known as, hold that all future Bible prophecy was fulfilled in the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. If there is a future second coming, they say, the Bible does not talk about it. Extreme preterists believe that there is no future bodily resurrection, which place them outside the realm of Christian orthodoxy." (Has Bible Prophecy Been Fulfilled?)
Tim LaHaye
"those who teach Christ came physically in A.D. 70 are borderline heretics"
(End Times Controversy, p. 10)
Robert Mounce
"The
major problem with the preterist position is that the decisive victory
portrayed in the latter chapters of the Apocalypse was never achieved.
It is difficult to believe that John envisioned anything less than the
complete overthrow of Satan, the final destruction of evil, and the
eternal reign of God. If this is not to be, then either the Seer was
essentially wrong in the major thrust of his message or his work was so
hopelessly ambiguous that its first recipients were all led astray"
(The Book of Revelation, 1977, 27)
Gary North
"I recommend the immediate public recantation and personal repentance of Russell's theology (Full Preterism). Barring this, I recommend the heretic's excommunication by his church's judicial body. The elders should allow the accused member to identify the heresy for which he is then excommunicated."
(David Chilton, R.I.P.)
"I would suggest that we not encourage (David Chilton's) heresy by interacting with him on this matter on this or any other forum. It is now a matter of Church discipline, assuming that he is under any." (North on Chilton)
"We can and should pray for the restoration of his mind, but to debate with him publicly will almost certainly drive him deeper into this heresy. He will feel compelled to defend himself in public. Let him go in peace. It is not our God-given task to confront him at this point. That is for his local church to do." (North on Chilton)
"Church officers who learn of any member's commitment to the doctrine of "full preterism" have an obligation to help this member clarify his or her thinking, and either become fully consistent with the full-preterist position or else fully abandon it. The member should be brought before the church's session or other disciplinary body and asked the following six questions in writing:"
"the member must also be asked to sign an affirmation of Chapter XXXIII of the Westminster Confession of Faith and answer 90 of the Larger Catechism. This signed statement constitutes a formal rejection of the "full preterist" position. The member must be told in advance that this signed statement can be shown to others at the discretion of the session. If the member refuses to sign such a statement under these conditions, the elders should continue the disciplinary process."
"There are only three lawful ways out of a local congregation: by death, by letter of transfer, and by excommunication. Presbyterian laymen who have been brought before the church's session because they are suspected of holding heretical preterism, and who persist in their commitment to heretical preterism by refusing to sign a statement that is consistent with the Westminster standards, must be removed from membership in the local congregation by excommunication." ("Full Preterism" : Manichean or Perfectionist-Pelagian?)
Joe Price (1989)
"It is not a harmless, private conviction which can be held
without hurting oneself and others, but a pernicious theory of error
which engulfs the soul of men in destructive heresy!" (Joe Price, "The
Second Coming of Christ: Did it Already Occur'! (3)," Guardian of Truth.
November 2, 1989, p. 650).
David B. Updegraff (1892)
"THE effort
to make people believe that the promised parousia [coming] of our Lord
took place at the "destruction of Jerusalem" tends to mislead souls,
blot out the Christian's hope, and destroy the value of Scripture as a
definite testimony to anything." (Old Corn: Or, Sermons and Addresses on the
Spiritual Life, p. 278)
Jim West
"We must not let them get away with calling themselves "preterists"
or "consistent preterists," or believers in "fulfilled eschatology." The word "preterist"
is a good word. The disciples of Hymenæus are not preterists; their "dispensable
eschatology" makes them heretics. " (The Allurement of Hymenæan Preterism: The
Rise of Dispensable Eschatology)
Douglas Wilson
"When some people find a hammer, everything starts to look
like a nail. In the world of hyper-preterism, we find that everything is devoted
to tying everything else into A.D. 70 somehow." (WSTTB, p.255 )