|
|
|
BOOKS: BIBLICAL STUDIES (1500BC-AD70) / EARLY CHRISTIAN PRETERISM (AD50-1000) / FREE ONLINE BOOKS (AD1000-2008)
|
AD70 Dispensationalism: According to
that view, AD70 was the end of 'this age' and the start of the 'age to come'.
Those who lived before AD70 could only 'see in part' and such, lacking
the resurrection and redemptive blessings which supposedly came only
when
Herod's Temple in Jerusalem
fell. Accordingly, AD70 was not only the end of Old
Testament Judaism, but it was also the end of the revelation of
Christianity as seen in the New Testament. |
HYPER PRETERISM
"Full Preterist"
material is being archived for balanced representation of all Preterist views,
but is classified under the theological term hyper (as in beyond
the acceptable range of tolerable doctrines) at this website. The
classification of all Full Preterism as Hyper Preterism (HyP) is built
upon well over a decade of intense research at PreteristArchive.com, and
the convictions of
the website curator (a
former full preterist pastor). The HyP
theology of resurrection and consummation in the fall of Jerusalem, with its dispensational line in AD70
(end of old age, start of new age), has never been known among authors
through nearly 20 centuries of Christianity leading up
to 1845, when the earliest known Full Preterist book was written.
Even though there may be many secondary points of agreement between
Historical/Modern Preterism and Hyper Preterism, their premises are undeniably and fundamentally different.
WARNING:
THE FOLLOWING MATERIAL HAS BEEN CLASSIFIED AS "HYPER PRETERIST" |
SOME DISTINCTIVE DOCTRINES OF SYSTEMATIZED HYPER PRETERISM It is important to keep in mind that many ideas and doctrines full preterism appeals to - such as the complete end of the Old Covenant world in AD70 - are by no means distinctive to that view. Many non HyPs believe this as well, so one need not embrace the Hyper Preterist system in order to endorse this view. Following are exceptional doctrines which, so far as I've seen, are only taught by adherents of Hyper Preterism.: DISTINCTIVE DOCTRINES TAUGHT BY STANDARD FULL PRETERISM
DISTINCTIVE DOCTRINES TAUGHT BY VARIOUS FORMS
|
Evil in the Revelation By Gabor Gombor
(bi-ga@freemail.hu) This article is not for attacking full preterism (since I think I'm also a full preterist :-) ), rather my thoughts about the existence of the Satan and evil in the Revelation. Any explanations to my doubts are welcome.
Right, we have the possiblity that the Revelation speak about Lake of Fire different ways, once the general "casting out" at AD 70 for the evil, and later in the chapters 21 and 22, it speak about the Lake of Fire in viewpoint of personal judgement after the death. (Heb. 9.27) But it is not crystal clear, the Scripture does not differentiate global and personal judgement.
What do YOU think ?
CommentsVery interesting. Very fresh... Thanks!
CommentsDid not understand the point of this article? Could someone try to make it simpler??? I just don't get what he's trying to say!!!
CommentsSatan was cast down when he was loosed. Not when he was bound - he was bound in the Gospels. --- Mark 3 27No one can enter a strong man's house and plunder his goods, unless he first binds the strong man. And then he will plunder his house. --- 1And I saw an angel coming down out of heaven, having the key to the Abyss and holding in his hand a great chain. 2He seized the dragon, that ancient serpent, who is the devil, or Satan, and bound him for a thousand years. 3He threw him into the Abyss, and locked and sealed it over him, to keep him from deceiving the nations anymore until the thousand years were ended. After that, he must be set free for a short time. --- I dont think that the abyss was here on earth - it was where Hades was. Most reformed people believe that the binding with a chain refers to satan being limited in his ability. We know that the gospel went out to the whole world Col 1:6 - IE the nations were not deceived. Satan was cast down during the tribulation. --- As for the Lambs book of Life. Wasnt that the book of the New Covenant. Are you a member of the New Covenant?
CommentsFrom Gabor: First, it is a great surprise to see here my article (but I'm happy to see it), second it is no wonder, if anyone does not understand it. What I heard about Satan until now: 1. He is an angelic host who became evil. (This is not too biblical, see Jn. 8.44 and 1Jn. 3.8) 2. Satan is the Law, the deceiver. Make some sense, because the Law was the ACCUSER, as the law was. Make doubts when I read passages which deal with Satan as person. 3. Satan is the spirit of evil, which origin is unknown and the Satan as AD 70 not more as first century Israel! (Rev. 2.9) If this viewpoint is true, it mean that the evil does exist also today, in AD 70 was only the AGENT of evil was cast down and destroyed. opinions? Gabor
Comments"Now is the judgment of this world: now shall the prince of this world be cast out" (John 12:31). Is this a reference to satan? The Revelation contains a true message, but is difficult to interpret. We need to begin with the more narrative passages in other books. There is Nothing in the Revelation that will negate or cause problems with the other books. I don't claim to have it all figured out, but as far as I can tell satan (whoever or whatever that is) needed to be restrained in order for the Gospel to spread. Satan must have been released at some point, but only for a short season - How can satan be here today if it was a short season? I believe the consummation of the ages was around AD 70. That means satan is in the Lake of Fire. Of course, there are those who believe the serpent to be apostate Israel and it was destroyed. There are plenty of scriptures that attest to man's inherant evil nature, and they begin back in early Genesis. Romans 1:30 says that man is the inventor of evil. Paul says the carnal mind is enmity against God. Apparently we do not need a "temptor" to do evil. Flesh and blood do not enter the kingdom of God, but rebirth is of the spirit. Remember the kingdom is not observable and not of this world. We "know" one another by "fruits" of the Spirit. The problem arises when we think the scriptures predict an evil-free world, but as long as there is flesh and blood, there will be carnal minds. We will NEVER have righeousness of ourselves - it is ALWAYS in Christ - and that is a spiritual concept which must be taken on faith. The promise was for a new covenant - one in which forgiveness and everlasting life is accessible. We have that. God was interested in reconciliation of sinful man back to Himself. That was accomplished through Christ. This whole question of the continual existence of evil is based upon presuppositions that must be challenged. Hebrews says that Christ came to destroy him who had the power of death. But Christ tasted death for all men. Christ paid for sin-death and destroyed the ultimate enemy. There is no promise in the scriptures to obliterate evil itself, but to subdue it's ultimate effects of sin-death. It's the things "seen" that are temporal, but the unseen things are eternal. We need to do a re-take of our scriptural presuppositions and be very careful in our approach to the Revelation. Keep digging. I hope this helps. |
Email PreteristArchive.com's Sole Developer and Curator, Todd Dennis
(todd @ preteristarchive.com)
Opened in 1996 |