Online Bible and Study Tools
Translate || Vine / Schaff || Alts/Vars/Criticism/Aramaic


End Times Chart

Introduction and Key


Church-State Relations and the Book of Revelation
An Introduction to The Parousia: A Careful Look at the New Testament Doctrine of the Lord's Second Coming
by James Stuart Russell (1878) // Written by
Todd Dennis, Curator

Critical Article
Critical Articles Main
Study Archive

Click For Site Updates Page

Free Online Books Page

Historical Preterism Main

Modern Preterism Main

Hyper Preterism Main

Preterist Idealism Main

Critical Article Archive Main

Church History's Preteristic Presupposition

Study Archive Main

Dispensationalist dEmEnTiA  Main

Josephus' Wars of the Jews Main

Online Study Bible Main

This Generation

By Anthony Buzzard
Focus on the Kingdom
July 2002, Volume 4 Number 10

“This generation will not pass before all these things take place” (Matt. 24:34)

    The text above is currently attracting attention. It is supposed to support the amazing idea that the Second Coming (Parousia), as described by Jesus in the Olivet Discourse (Matt. 24), took place in AD 70!

Such a view abandons the Gospel of the Kingdom, which promises the world a universal era of prosperity and peace when the Messiah comes back. The destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70 and the scattering of Jews outside their homeland did not signal the arrival of the Kingdom of God (Luke 21:31). The Kingdom, when it comes, will produce peace in Israel and the restoration of Israel as the headquarters of the Messianic Kingdom (Luke 1:32-35; Acts 1:6; 3:21, etc.). To imagine that the coming of Jesus happened in AD 70 is to misunderstand the Kingdom of God and thus the Christian Gospel of the Kingdom (Matt. 4:23; 9:35; 24:14).

The fact is that the New Testament, while maintaining an urgency in regard to the Kingdom, states that “the Son of God” himself “does not know the day or the hour” (Mark 13:32), and the disciples are not to know, according to Jesus’ parting words, even “times and seasons” (Acts 1:5-7) for the great event. This makes it impossible that Jesus had given them any kind of time limit for the coming of the Kingdom. The argument that he had declared that the end would come within at the most 40 years, a generation, must be mistaken, unless we charge him with a considerable confusion. If in fact “generation” is to mean 40 years in the famous text “this generation will not pass until all these things have happened” (Matt. 24:34; Mark 13:30; Luke 21:32), then why only a couple of months later is Jesus saying that the disciples can have no idea about “spans of time or seasons” (Acts 1:7) relative to his return? Why is Peter later in the New Testament period telling us that days are as a thousand years with God? He seems undisturbed by any so-called delay of the Second Coming. Peter had indeed glimpsed the Parousia and Kingdom in his own lifetime when privileged to see it in vision (Matt. 17:9) on the Mount of Transfiguration (2 Pet. 1:16-19). Had Peter really been led to understand in AD 30 that Jesus would come within 40 years?

The term genea (generation) is the equivalent in the LXX of the Hebrew word dor which means generation or age. Many exegetes have noticed that in the New Testament genea can have the sense of “age” or “indefinite period of time.” The following is from the Dictionary of the Apostolic Church, Vol. 1, p. 444 (“generation”):

“Genea — expresses the idea of kinship, those of the same lineage who are born about the same time...or more generally an ‘age’ or lengthened period of time...Finally (d) the word is used, as often in the OT (Deut. 32:5, 20; Ps. 12:7, 24:6, etc.), with a moral connection as in Phil. 2:15 and Acts 2:40. In the latter passage the word has an eschatological coloring. ‘This crooked generation’ is the present, swiftly transient period of the world’s history, which is leading up to the day of judgment and the New Age.”

So also the Dictionary of Christ and the Gospels, Vol. 1, p. 639: “That genea (rendered generation) does express ‘the current age’ of ‘the world period’ is obvious in the Gospels (Luke 16:8, Matt. 24:34 and less clearly Matt. 23:36).”

One can add: In Matthew 23:35 Jesus says that “you” killed the prophets of the Old Testament. He speaks in the next verse of “this generation,” and the generation he has in mind apparently reaches back 400 years to the murderers of Zechariah. They are all the same wicked “brood.” They are all included in the corporate “you.” Jesus then looks forward to the Parousia when “you” will say, “Blessed is he who comes...” Thus genea takes in a wide sweep of people, belonging to the present evil age, belonging to the same genre, society as organized in opposition to God.

Note also the sensible comment of Cranfield (Gospel of Mark): He points out that genea renders the Hebrew dor = seed, family and people. “Probably here — ‘whoever is ashamed of me in this adulterous and sinful generation’ (Mark 8:38) — generation means ‘age,’ ‘period of time,’ which is the primary meaning of the Hebrew dor, the word it most often represents in the LXX, and a possible meaning of genea. The whole phrase, ‘this generation,’ is contrasted with ‘when he shall come with his holy angels’ and so is roughly equivalent to ‘in this time’ (10:30) which is contrasted with ‘in the coming age.’ The time meant is the time before the Parousia. But it is not thought of simply as a period of time; the thought of the men living in it and of their character is also present and prominent — hence the adjectives adulterous and sinful” (p. 284).

Note also Psalm 102:18: “This will be written for the genea to come that a people which will be created may praise the Lord.” This contrasts the present time with the “generation to come,” millennial in this passage. Note also Psalms of Solomon 18:6: “Blessed are those born in those [future Messianic] days, to see the good things of the Lord which He will do for the coming generation...a good generation living in the fear of the Lord.” This shows that generation can mean a “group of people with common characteristics.”

When Proverbs 30:11-14 says that “there is a generation (genea) of those who curse their fathers…There is a generation who are pure in their own eyes…There is a generation whose teeth are as swords,” the meaning is “a class of people identified by a common characteristic.” So also in Psalm 24:6, “the generation of those who seek God.”

In Luke 16:8 Jesus remarked that “the children of this age are wiser in regard to their generation [people belonging to the same class and age as they] than the children of light.” The contrast is between two groups of people, those touched by the Kingdom Gospel and those not. It is clear that “generation,” used generally in a pejorative sense in the New Testament as “wicked society this side of the second coming,” does not have to be restricted to a period of 40 years.[1] In an eschatological setting such as Matthew 24 Jesus contrasts the two ages.

It defies common sense to believe that Jesus set an almost exact date of 40 years in Matthew 24:34, when soon after he denied that any knowledge of times and seasons is available to us (Acts 1:7) in regard to the coming of the future Kingdom (Acts 1:6).

[1]Cp. T.D.N.T (single volume) which defines genea as “manner” in Luke 16:8.

What do YOU think ?

Submit Your Comments For Posting Here
Comment Box Disabled For Security


25 Aug 2003




Here we go again with the basic Scofield lie that because the Holy Spirit has not brought about an era of worldwide peace and prosperity God will "soon" arrange for the worldwide enforcement of the law of Moses to accomplish that goal (an maginary goal). But the NT makes it clear that because the weak, external law of Moses was such a miserable failure God made possible the "better hope" of the powerful, indwelling Holy Spirit (Heb. 7:18,19). Amazing how dispensationalists can turn truth upside down.


28 Aug 2003




"Seventy weeks are determined for your people and for your holy city, to finish the transgression, to make an end of sins, to make reconciliation for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up vision and prophecy, and to anoint the Most Holy.” (Daniel 9:24) "Therefore you are witnesses against yourselves that you are sons of those who murdered the prophets. Fill up, then, the measure of your fathers' guilt. Serpents, brood of vipers! How can you escape the condemnation of hell? Therefore, indeed, I send you prophets, wise men, and scribes: some of them you will kill and crucify, and some of them you will scourge in your synagogues and persecute from city to city, that on you may come all the righteous blood shed on the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah, son of Berechiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar. Assuredly, I say to you, all these things will come upon this generation.” (Matt 23:31-36) Jesus was talking here of the crimes of previous “generations” falling on His “generation”. What could be clearer? Also, do you see any connection between “to finish the transgression” and “Fill up, then, the measure of your fathers' guilt?” By the way, Anthony! What do you do with all of the immanency statements? Does “shortly”, “about to”, “near”, “at hand”, etc, mean many centuries from when they were written? Did Jesus and the Holy Spirit lie to the apostles, to us? There is no inconsistency between occurrences that mark the approach of an immanent event and not knowing the exact day and hour of its arrival. It’s like watching the approach of a storm, or an expectant mother as she goes into labor. You know it is going to happen soon, but you do not know the exact moment until it happens. Anthony, try to read the Prophets, Daniel, and Revelation in their historical perspectives. (put Revelation in the early 60s A.D. prior to Nero’s persecutions, Vespasian’s Judean campaign, and Titus’ siege/destruction of Jerusalem of the Temple and you will begin to understand.) Read the texts in their plain sense meaning. Not literalistically, but as a 1st Century Jew would with an understanding and appreciation for the imagery and Jewish figures of speech. Then read the works of Josephus and Tacitus concerning the Roman-Jewish war and tell me that the horrors that occurred during the siege of Jerusalem are not the same horrors that are envisioned in John’s Apocalypse? Can you honestly read "Blessed are the dead who die in the Lord from now on"' and think the end of the world has happened? Does not the harvest that occurs in the last half of Revelation 14 look just like Matt 24:29-31? "Immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken. Then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. 31And He will send His angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they will gather together His elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.” To borrow your words, “It defies common sense to believe that Jesus” did not do what He said He would do when He said He would do it.

Date: 12 Feb 2006
Time: 12:21:45


The comment below that "at hand" means the event is coming very soon, ie AD 70, for Jesus, overlooks the obvious fact that the OT prophets constantly said that the Day of the Lord was coming soon. The Day of the Lord has not yet arrived.
To say that the Parousia happened in AD 70 is to commmit the serious mistake of saying that the resurrection of the dead happened in AD 70-- a colossal non-event which no one saw!
Anthony Buzzard

Date: 06 Aug 2007
Time: 19:26:30


This article is well thought through and logical. There is no historical evidence of a second coming of Christ in 70 AD, and the weight of clear Biblical evidence is that Jesus did NOT know when he would return, so a close scrutiny of Matt. 24:34 is obligatory to see if an alternate meaning is possible. The different usages in greek of genea can not be ignored by an honest Bible student.
Ted Loper

Date: 30 Oct 2008
Time: 20:19:24


The bible also says that nobody will know the day or the hour and that he will return as a thief in the night. Predicting the second coming is pretty silly when the bible says that we won't see it coming.

Date: 08 Feb 2009
Time: 12:12:18

Your Comments:

i believe the second coming of christ will never happen

Click For Index Page

Free Online Books Historical Preterism Modern Preterism Study Archive Critical Articles Dispensationalist dEmEnTiA  Main Josephus Church History Hyper Preterism Main

Email's Sole Developer and Curator, Todd Dennis  (todd @ Opened in 1996