The Revelation Unrevealed:
Concerning the thousand-yeares
reigne of the saints with Christ upon earth. Laying forth the weak grounds,
and strange consequences of that plausible, and too-much received opinion.
By an unfained lover of truth, peace, order, and just moderation
Joseph Hall
1650
CLICK HERE FOR PDF FILE OF ENTIRE BOOK
Joseph Hall (1 July 1574 – 8 September 1656) was an
English bishop, satirist and moralist. His contemporaries knew him as a
devotional writer, and a high-profile controversialist of the early 1640s.
In church politics, he tended in fact to a middle way.
Thomas Fuller wrote:
"He was commonly called our English Seneca, for the purenesse, plainnesse,
and fulnesse of his style. Not unhappy at Controversies, more happy at
Comments, very good in his Characters, better in his Sermons, best of all in
his Meditations."
His relationship to the stoicism of the classical age, exemplified by Seneca
the Younger, is still debated, with the importance of neo-stoicism and the
influence of Justus Lipsius to his work being contested, in contrast to
Christian morality.
Other controversial writings include:
-
The Olde Religion: A treatise, wherein is laid downe
the true state of the difference betwixt the Reformed and the Romane
Church; and the blame of this schisme is cast upon the true Authors
(1628)
-
Columba Noae olivam adferens, a sermon preached
at St Paul's in 1623
-
A Short Answer to the Vindication of Smectymnuus
(1641)
-
A Modest Confutation of (Milton's) Animadversions
(1642).
His devotional works include:
-
Holy Observations Lib. I (1607)
-
Some few of David's Psalmes Metaphrased (1609)
-
three centuries of Meditations and Vowes, Divine and
Morall (1606, 1607, 1609), edited by Charles Sayle
-
The Arte of Divine Meditation (1607)
-
Heaven upon Earth, or of True Peace and
Tranquillitie of Mind (1606), reprinted with some of his letters in
John Wesley's
Christian Library, vol. iv. (1819)
-
Occasional Meditations (1630), edited by his son
Robert Hall
-
Henochisme; or a Treatise showing how to walk with
God (1639), translated from Bishop Hall's Latin by Moses Wall
-
The Devout Soul; or Rules of Heavenly Devotion
(1644), often since reprinted
-
The Balm of Gilead (1646, 1752)
-
Christ Mysticall; or the blessed union of Christ and
his Members (1647), of which General Gordon was a student (reprinted
from Gordon's copy, 1893)
-
Susurrium cum Deo (1659)
-
The Great Mysterie of Godliness (1650)
-
Resolutions and Decisions of Divers Practicall cases
of Conscience (1649, 1650, 1654).
LOOSE OCR RENDERING:
That prophecies, especially before
they are fulfilled, are no other than riddles, needs no other proof,
than, amongst other, the two dark passages of the Revelation; the one,
concerning the Number and Name of the Beast, 666; the other, concerning
the Thousand Years' Reign of the Saints: either of which I may say, many
have guessed at; but no man living hath yet been fully to unfold.
Our business is with the latter;
set forth by the Beloved Disciple and Evangelical Prophet, St. John,
towards the shutting up of his divine Revelation.
But of the literal sense whereof,
not a few, in these latter times, have been raised to such a confidence
of the speedy accomplishment of this new Kingdom, as if they did already
see the clouds breaking under the glorious feet of their Returning
Saviour, and the chairs of this blessed date set ready for their
enthronization. How many have I heard, joyfully professing
their hopes of an imminent share of that happy Kingdom! Yea, some
have gone so far, as already to date their Letters from New Jerusalem,
and to subscribe themselves glorified: whose ungrounded credulity may
receive some just correction, if they shall but see the strange variety
of construction, which this supposed earthly sovereignty hath undergone,
from men as wise, in their own opinion, as themselves.
Whereunto that I may make the
better way, I shall lay this for an undoubted ground, That there is no
passage in the whole book of God, wherein this Millenary Reign of Saints
is punctually expressed, save only this of the Revelation.
For, as for those Sixty-six Texts
alledged by Alstedius, and the late Herald of Zion's Joy, they are too
general to make out such a specialty, both of the term and the personal
administration, which is contended for; and, besides, have been, by the
judgment of all allowed Antiquity and all Christian authors till the
fag-end of this last century, understood of the spiritual beauty and
glory of the Evangelical Church, under the happy times of the Gospel.
Whosever shall be pleased to take a strict view of these several
Scriptures shall find them only to import the calling of the Gentiles,
the conversion of the Jews, the abundance of rich graces poured out upon
believers, God's gracious protection and enlargement of his Christian
Church, the subjugation and overthrow of the public enemies thereof; all
which may well stand without any relation to the pretended Dominion of
the Raised Marrtyrs or Changed Saints. So I cannot but
wonder to see Christian authors so apt to humour the refractory Jews, in
a literal construction of the prophetical predictions of the restoration
of that pompous and secular glory, which they have hitherto fondly
dreamed of, and hath been hitherto unanimously decried by all the
ancient and late Doctors of the Christian Church: and to see these
evangelical promises thus carnally drained into a wrong channel ; which,
certainly, whoso shall stand upon in so gross a sense, may as well
contend that the New Jerusalem shall really have twelve gates of twelve
pearls, and streets of pure gold and the foundations of the wall all
manner of precious stones: and if these be figurative, why should the
other be literal?
But that Scripture, which might
seem to bear most the Prophetic weight in this subject, is the prophecy
of Daniel : who, in the construction of the favourers of the
Millennarian opinion, is pretended to speak particularly of the
tyrannical reign of Antichrist, of his destruction, of the happy
deliverance and peace of the faithful under the Gospel ; not without a
special designation of the punctual time, wherein that Man of Sin shall
be revealed, and wherein God's people shall enjoy rest and happiness,
both in the beginning and termination thereof. Insomuch as,
besides Alstede, our learned Mede, in a Latin Manuscript of his which
came lately to my hands, concerning the Revelation of the Antichrist,
grounds his judgment upon Daniel's prophecy; not a little blaming some
late expositor, for turning the stream of those predictions another way.
But reserving a due reverence
to so great and eagle-eyed authors, I dare appeal to all unbiased
judgments, whether it do not best suit with all the circumstances of
those enigmatical prophecies of Daniel, to confine their relations
only to the Jewish Church; making their utmost extent to be the
death of the Messiah and the destruction of Jerusalem, without any
further meddling with the state of the Church evangelical; saving
only in that one touch of the second coming of Christ to judgment,
wherein both the whole Church and world is jointly concerned.
To
make, therefore, the fourth monarchy to be the Roman tyrannizing
over the reformed Church under the gospel, and the little horn with
eyes to be the Antichrist of the last times, and to draw the
computation of the times mentioned unto an accordance to an imagined
calculation, may seem to be no other than a straining of the text
beyond the intention of the author. Sure we are, that all those
prophetical predictions were literally and really fulfilled to and
upon the Jews, under the reign of those kings amongst whom the
Grecian empire of Alexander the Great was shared, and that in the
just times which were designed; but upon what grounds we may stretch
them farther, to a reaccomplishment in these last times, it is
neither easy nor safe to determine.
Two things must be yielded:
first, that those descriptions which are made by divines0
of that cruel tyrant and persecutor Antiochus Epiphanes, may well,
by just allusion, be applied to the Antichrist under the gospel:
secondly, that it hath pleased the Spirit of God to make use of the
same expressions in John's description of times which had formerly
been taken up by Daniel: but hereupon to infer a revolution of the
same condition of the Christian Church in the last age of the world,
both in respects of her enemies and several events, seems strangely
inconsequent.
Section III.
The probablest and most urgent
passages of the prophet Daniel, The most ur- and those which are
most stood upon by the forethfpro^efy of
named authors, are Dan. xii. n, 12, And from the
Daniel cleared, time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken
away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there
shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days. Blessed is the
man that waiteth, and cometh to the thousand three hundred and five
and thirty days.
c CEcolampad.
Comment, in Danielem. l. ii.
Where these two things are
taken by these expositors for granted: I. That the taking away of
the daily sacrifice and this desolatory abomination, is to be
understood of the last destruction of Jerusalem by Titus: 2. That
the days there mentioned are to be understood to be so many years,
which shall immediately succeed in the process of the evangelical
Church.
So
as, by Alsted's confident account, the destruction of Jerusalem
falling upon the sixty-ninth year of Christ, presently begins the
reckoning of the thousand two hundred and ninety prophetical days;
that is, so many years; which do expire in the year of Christ 13.59;
about which time divers worthy persons, say they, began to oppose
Antichristian impiety. From this period, they tell us, we must begin
to compute the second number mentioned by Daniel, which is the one
thousand three hundred and thirtyfive days; that is, years; which
shall bring us unto the year of Christ 2694: in which, saith
Alstcdius, the thousand years of the saints spoken of in the
Revelation shall have end; and they
being ended, the war of Gog and Magog shall begin, which the last
judgment supervening shall put to an end. So then take from these
two thousand six hundred and ninety-four years one thousand years of
the saints' reign, there remain one thousand six hundred and
ninety-four. In this year then, or sooner, saith he, the thousand
years of the happy reign of the saints shall take their beginning.
But what a weak and sandy
foundation is this whereon to raise so high a structure! a
foundation merely laid upon a misconstructive conjecture.
For what if that desolation
mentioned be not that of Titus 1 what if those days be not
years? where arc we then for the time of our millenary reign?
Let
us then obtain leave to inquire a little into both these:
And for the first, it is more
than probable, by all circumstances, that this desolating
abomination hero spoken of, is the same with that which is
forementioned, Dan. vii. 25, and viii. 13, 14, wherein the taking
away of the daily sacrifice and the desolation specified are
foretold by the angel interpreting the vision, and the very same
time limited for the fulfilling of it; both which are accordingly,
with much clearness of indubitable truth, accomplished in that
persecuting tyrant Antiochus Epiphanes. Compare we the texts and the
times. He, saith the angel, shall think to change times
and laws: and they shall be given into his
hand until a time and times and the
dividing of time, Dan. vii. 25. By him the daily
sacrifice was taken away, and the place of his sanctuary was cast
down. And an host was given him against the daily sacrifice
by reason of transgression, and it cast down the truth to the
ground; and it practised, and prospered, Dan. viii. 11, 12. Now
what is a time, times, and a parcel of time, by Daniel's own
exposition<1, but three years and
some days? and what are those three years and few days, but those
three years and ten days wherein the rage of persecution continued
upon the Jews till the happy restoration of God's worship wrought by
Judas Maccabeus, who, in seven months and ten days after this,
forced the confirmation of it from the persecutors? And who is the
man that shall do this great mischief intimated? Even that bloody
Antioehus, which is so exactly deciphered by the prophet, as if he
meant to forestall all question that might arise concerning him in
the following generations: for it cannot be doubted that the great
horn of the goat6, which was the
third monarch, was Alexander the Great; which horn being broken, the
four horns that arose instead thereof were unquestionably those four
kingdoms towards the four coasts of heaven, amongst which that
Grecian monarchy was divided: which were of Egypt towards the south,
falling to the share of Ptolemy Philadelphus; of Syria towards the
north, which fell to Seleucus Nicanor; of Macedon towards the west,
which fell to Cassander; and of Asia the Less to the east, which
fell to the share of Antigonus. Now out of one of these, saith the
prophet, that is, Seleucus Nicanor king of Syria, shall arise that
little horn, the cruel Antioehus Epiphanes, who shall make such
woful havock amongst God's select nation the Jewsf;
styled the people of the saints of the most High, Dan. vii.
27, in taking away the daily sacrifice, and defacing the sanctuary:
whose grievous persecution, for the first stage of it, was of that
punctual duration.
![[graphic]](http://books.google.com/books?id=WeI8AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA301&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&q=inauthor:%22Joseph+Hall%22+The+Revelation+Unrevealed&cds=1&sig=ACfU3U0X2pufzsoFCwIYzL_Efj1mfXKqWA&edge=0&edge=stretch&w=285&h=455&ci=122,278,710,1134)
And to make the matter yet more
clear, if we shall compare Dan. viii. 14 with this instanced text of
Dan. xii. 7, we shall find the number of the days pitched upon to be
the very same, for a time, times, and half a time: so as the
1 290 days immediately specified make up that three years and a half
wherein the fury of Antiochus's persecution shall continue; without
any relation to the Roman Titus, which is pretended by these authors
to make good their imagined computation. Reverend Calvin,
whose judgment I so much honour that I reckon him amongst the best
interpreters of scripture since the apostles left the earth, is
willing to construe this of the last desolation of the Jews by the
Roman victors, but knows not what to make of the days specified;
professing, that he is no Pythagorean for matter of numbers, and
therefore contents himself to take this 1290 only pro longo
temporis tractu, "for some long indefinite tract of time." But
whereas Alstede builds his conceit upon the succession of these two
numbers, making the 1335 days (i.e. years) to follow after the
former 1290 expiring, out of both making up his accomplished number
of the saints' reign; Calvine checks him with a plain
perperam; and resolves, upon a certum est, that both
these numbers are coincident, and are to be taken for one and the
same, with that small addition of the greater and later sum of years
to the former: which if it be yielded, we are altogether to seek for
our calculation of the thousand years wherein the saints must reign
upon earth.
Only one main rub seems to lie
in our way, which we must be careful to remove. Our Saviour himself
speaks of the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the
prophet, standing in the holy place, as a thing in his
days yet to come h; and therefore
with undoubted relation to the Roman army led by Titus, and to the
final sacking of Jerusalem. All which I do willingly grant, without
any the least derogation from that former verity; for what is the
holy place but the temple of Jerusalem? and what is the
abomination of desolation but the idolatrous, heathenish,
destructive army? such was both that of Titus and that of Antiochus.
The place then of Daniel to which our Saviour alludes, with charge
to him that reads to observe, is not the forementioned text now
insisted upon, but Dan. ix. 27; wherein the angel, after the end of
the designed weeks, tells us of the final destruction of the city
and the sanctuary, which in the just time was accordingly fulfilled:
so as this passage of prophecy hath no affinity at all with that of
the xiith of Daniel, being not so much before it in place as after
it in time.
Yet, if the event had not
punctually made good every jot of this prediction, so construed as
we have declared, there might be some doubt of the sense contended
for; but now, the issue of the things did so evidently answer to the
words thus interpreted, as
B "Quidam
separant, sed perperam, dies 1290 et 1335. Nam, certum est pro eodem
aecipi."—Calv. in loc. Dan. Serm. 12. n
Matt. xxiv. 15.
one would think there could be
no place left for contradiction: for, as Junius, Rolloc, and Deodati
have clearly computed it to my hands, from the time that Antiochus
Epiphanes began to set up idolatry at Jerusalem, until the time
wherein he was compelled by the victorious Maccabeus, both to permit
and allow and ratify the reformation thereof by his charter', there
passed three years, seven months, and about thirteen days; which
amount to the , thousand two hundred and ninety days, mentioned v.
u. And from the setting up of that idolatry, if we reckon to the
time of the full deliverance of God's people from the yoke of that
tyranny, it will fall upon the second number mentioned, v. 12,
wherein that wicked Antiochus was taken away by death; which makes
up the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days: which day
whoso should live to see, is declared to be blessed, for his happy
freedom, and comfortable enjoying of the holy worship of God.
Section IV.
And now, what is here in the
letter of Daniel's prophecy that These pretended doth but look
towards the thousand years' reign of doctrines cannot
the upon
earth? Surely not one syllable
that
be grounded up-
r »
on Daniel byway may without a
violent angariation be drawn to such
of type, or analogy. Inquiry
made whether. And if Alstede
shall pretend that these mysteries are single, the of the
later times, concerning the Antichrist and the sense be clear. time
0f the
samts' reign, are to be found in
Daniel, not in the express letter, but in a way of type or analogy,
because he meets with the same phraseology of time, and the like
description of persons and things in the evangelist's
revelation which he finds in Daniel's
prophecy; surely, he had need of greater authority for the warrant
of such application than, I fear, can be produced: and if that were
yielded, yet that which we are wont to say of similitude is verified
much more in prefigurations that they are not intended to hold
universally; and, in short, symbolical divinity is not to be trusted
for matter of proof.
What mysteries there may be in
numbers, and upon what reason it hath pleased the Spirit of God to
take up the same terms of numeration for days, months, years, and
times in the case of the Christian Church which he made use of in
the Jewish, I suppose it were too much presumption in any man to
determine.
I 2 Maccab.
xi. 33.
And if the events of things be
the best commentaries upon prophecies, how unanswerable those have
proved to the computations and sense of our new Chiliasts shall in
due place be made manifest.
Now if there be any other
amongst those sixty-five places alleged by Alstedius, wherein the
favourers of the millenarian reign can place any confidence for the
evicting of their opinion, I should be glad to see it driven up to
the head. For my part, I must sincerely profess I see none that can
so much as raise, much less settle my belief.
Supposing, then, as we well
may, that this place of Rev. xx. stands alone; let us inquire
whether the sense of it be so clear as that we may with good
assurance build upon it, for the certainty of our resolution
concerning the state of the whole world, and particularly of all
God's saints, for the space of a whole thousand years, lost hitherto
in the vulgar account of all Christian divines. Surely, there can be
but one truth; and whatever falls beside it is but vain opinion: as,
when two points are fixed, there can be but one direct line drawn
betwixt them; all other bewray a manifest variation and obliquity.
The stars, because they keep a regular course, yield most certain
observations of their site and motions; but the clouds, which
are raised out by vapours and carried by winds, how far they are
from affording a true judgment, let every almanack witness. Now
whether this conceit be a star or a cloud shall appear by that which
folioweth.
Section V. Some
expositors, then, and those neither few nor mean, have The diveTM
con- taken the thousand years of Satan's shutting up to structions
of the be the same thousand wherein the saints shall reign.
thousand years ... ...
of Satan's shut- Others, not
fewer, make the saints reign to follow ting up.
tnis
binding of Satan for many hundreds of years.
And for the time of this
chaining up of Satan some take the thousand years for a long time,
but indefinite: so Fulkek and Deodatil.
Others construe literally, of that determinate number of years
specified. Some define it to be the whole time since the first
publishing of the gospel to the end of the world: so Nicholaus
Zegerus, Emmanuel Sa, and Estius m.
Some determine it to be the whole time of
the gospel published until the days of their Antichrist; which
should be three years and an half before the judgment: so Ribera",
out of Augustin: so Haymo", and Joannes Gagnaeus, a divine of Paris.
Some define this number of the
Ioco years to begin
the 36th year, or thereabouts, after our Saviour's death; when the
Jewish Church being overthrown, Satan rushed impetuously upon the
Church Christian, and was restrained till the days of Hildebrand: so
Junius.
Some define it to begin from
the time of Constantine (whom Air. Brightman conceives to be that
angel which, coming down from heaven, and having the keys of the
bottomless pit, laid hold on the dragon, and bound him in chains),
till the thousand years expired; which ended in the one thousand
three hundredth year of Christ, in the days of Boniface the Eighth,
and the Ottoman empire: so Napier and Brightman and Mr. Fox.
Some reckon it from first
preaching of the gospel by Christ and his apostles until the time of
Gregory the Seventh, otherwise called Hildebrand: and the time of
Satan's loosing to be 400 or 500 years: so Dent.
Others, ending tho time of
Satan's shutting up in the year 1300, make the time of his rage to
be an hour, a day, a month, and a year; that is, about three hundred
and ninety years after: so Brightman.
Some others make the loosing of
Satan to be when Mahomet and the pope grew so great; which was at
the end of the thousand years after Christ: in all which time the
sincere doctrine was taught, till Antichrist came in with the
doctrine of the sacrifice of the mass, and the doctrine of merits,
satisfactions, &c.: so Fulke.
Some place the beginning of
Satan's binding upon the year 1517, when the witnesses were raised;
for that from that time all people have not generally drunk any new
poison of heresy, which might weaken or overthrow their faith: so
Matthaeus Cotterius.
Some others imagine the
beginning of this chaining up of Satan to be after the taking of
Rome by the Goths, and after Augustulus, who was the last emperor of
the west; affirming, though upon fickle grounds, that after the fall
of the Roman empire, yea after Mahomet, there was peace in the
Church for 1000 years: so as
n
Ribern in loo. 0 Haymo l. vii. in Apoc.
Satan was bound, and shut up in
the bottomless pit, till this last age now passed: so Mariana.
Others hold that this thousand
years of Satan's binding up is not yet begun, but shall be in this
age, wherein the saints' reign shall enter about the year 1694: so
Alstedius and his followers.
These are some of those
varieties of constructions (for, if I listed to look after them, it
were easy to cloy the reader with many more; these tendered
themselves to me suddenly, and, as it were, unsought) which have
passed concerning the thousand years' captivity of Satan, whereby it
pleased the Spirit of God to make way to the thousand years' reign
of the saints. In the determination whereof there is no less
multiplicity of judgment amongst learned and Christian interpreters;
some few whereof I shall lay forth before my reader.
Section VI.
And, first, concerning the
times of this reign.
"A
thousand," saith HaymoP, "is a perfect number; and, The divers con-
therefore, by a thousand years we understand the struotions of the
present life and the future: now the saints reign
thousand years': . . . , ^ . .
reign of the by taith; and, in
the day o1 judgment, their reign samts-
shall not be terminated, but receive a glorious aug
mentation." So he.
To
the same purpose saith Colladoni: "The thousand years are the whole
series of time here in this world, in which there shall be always a
Church of Christ. As the faithful have lived and reigned with Christ
a thousand years, that is in the whole space of this life, so they
shall reign with Christ a thousand years in the whole duration of
the world to come."
And, if this seem too large,
surely these men do not shoot farther over than Joannes Brocardus
shooteth short; who contractet h the thousand years after the
establishment of the gospel into a thousand days here on earth; as,
contrarily, Jonas's forty days were stretched out into forty years.
Of
those that hold not fit to divide the time betwixt the present and
future life, some understand the thousand years'
reign to be understood of the flourishing estate of the Church
militant during the time of Satan's captivity: "For all the
faithful," say they, " do in a sort live and reign with Christ here
on earth, when they overcome the world by faith:" so Mr, Dent. Some,
again, take it of the whole time between the first coming of
P
Haymo in Apoc. l. vii. « Collado in Apoc. xx.
Christ and the second: so
OEcolampadius, in Daniele. Others, waving the present life,
define it to be meant of that glorious kingdom which the souls of
the saints enjoy in heaven until the day of judgment: so Mariana: so
Estius: and Fulke, to the same purpose, thus:—" These martyrs, being
delivered from the calamities of this miserable life by the first
death, and being taken up into heavenly joys, they live and reign
still with Christ through the whole thousand years, so long as Satan
shall remain in bonds: not that after that thousand years they shall
die; but to express how great a benefit it was to the godly to be
all that while in happiness:" thus he; without any supposition of a
preceding resurrection. Joannes Piscator, as going yet farther, even
half the millenary way, so construes it, as that it is to be
understood of the raised martyrs and their ensuing glorification:
"This," saith he, "is the singular happiness of the martyrs of
Christ, who, before these 1000 years, endured persecution; even
their resurrection, which shall be before the general resurrection;
and their reign in heaven with Christ for a thousand years before
the resurrection of the rest.
Of
those which take this 1000 years' reign to be in this life below,
there is no small variety of construction. Illyricusr
takes it to be an inversion of sense; the predicate being set before
the subject, the relative before the antecedent; so as the order of
the sense should be thus; "I saw the souls of those that worshipped
not the beast, &c., and that died for Christ, to live and reign with
him, and to sit on their thrones, and judge the wicked; reigning
with Christ spiritually, in suffering bodily; as those who, by their
martyrdom for Christ, shall reign and triumph, all the time of
Satan's repression, over him and his wicked instruments." Aretius
thus: "They lived again, and reigned with Christ: that is, their
cause was found just before him; and they were openly accounted and
pronounced saints." "The thousand years'
reign," saith Ribera, " is not to be referred to those which
worshipped not the beast; for he speaks not of them as dead: but is
to be referred to the souls of those which had been martyred for the
testimony of Jesus; that is, to those who, when he wrote this, had
suffered death for Christ:" so he. But others take it for a later
reckoning. "This reign of iooo years," saith Brightman8,
" was to begin where the former period ended; that is, in the year
1300: wherein the continuance of the truth is promised
to be for 1000 years, after the restitution" of it in these parts of
Europe, whose is the first resurrection: we only have seen three
whole hundreds of it passed since the first resurrection:" thus he.
"Not so," saith Mr. Cotton1, " but,
after the destruction of Antichrist, the saints shall enjoy that
liberty a thousand years together: not any one of them, but men of
the same spirit shall reign with Christ a thousand years in the
government of the Church upon earth: reign with him; that is,
execute, not their own government, but the government of Christ."
"Nay," saith Alstede, Mede, and Archer, " that sense falls too
short: but the bodies of the martyrs and saints shall rise again in
the beginning of those thousand years before the universal and last
resurrection; and shall reign here with Christ upon earth, as being
appointed governors of the Church with Christ." "No, they shall not
rise in their bodies," saith Mr. Cotton; "but there shall rise men
of the same spirit; who shall have the judicature and government of
the Church, together with these angels or messengers, and ministers
of God: those that were branded before for heretics, they shall be
the only men to be fit to have crowns on their heads, and
independent government committed to them:" thus he.
But I
may not tire the reader too much with the enumeration of these
differences.
Some take this thousand years'
reign to take beginning after the second resurrection: whom Mr.
Brightman absolutely rejects.
Others, in the other extreme,
imagine themselves now already reigning with Christ; their
resurrection or change to be already past; and themselves glorified,
and possessed of the new Jerusalem descended from heaven; who, if
they do find in themselves these high workings of the Spirit, which
they profess; and be so far transported with these raptures as to
think themselves already in their new heaven; I should not be more
apt to wonder at their ecstasies than to pity their glory.
Mr. Mede makes the 1000 years'
reign to be the day of a more visible and apparent judgment;
circumscribed with two conspicuous resurrections, as two limited
terms. "It shall be," saith hou,
"begun, first, with the particular and timely judgment of
Antichrist, and other enemies of the Church then remaining alive,
with the glorious appearance of our Lord Jesus Christ, in
flames of fire: and at len<;th,
after the kingdom of a thousand years granted to his holy Spouse,
the new Jerusalem here on earth, and others that shall afterward be
born, thi3 great day now drawing to an end, shall be finished, after
the letting loose of Satan and utter destruction of the Church's
enemies, with the general resurrection and judgment of all the dead;
which being performed, the wicked shall be thrust down to hell, to
be tormented everlastingly, and the saints translated into heaven,
to reign eternally with Christ." So he.
Shortly, some hold this reign
of Christ with his saints for the i ooo years shall be personal and
visible: so Mede and Archer. Others, that this while Christ shall
reign visibly in heaven, invisibly upon earth: so Alstedius. Others
leave it in medio, whether personal or otherwise: so Mr.
Burroughs*.
And, lastly, whereas this
kingdom of the thousand years relates to the resurrection; some hold
the first resurrection spiritually, to be understood of rising from
sin by a spiritual regeneration: so Fulke and Aretius. Others take
it of a bodily resurrection of some elect persons, before the
general: as Alstede and Mede. Others take it of a resurrection of
churches, when recovered from their apostatical and dead estate in
idolatry: so Mr. Cottony. Others, lastly, make the first
resurrection to be the glorification of the souls of the elect; and
the second, at the general day, the arising to their perfect
blessedness, both in souls and bodies: so Gagnaeus. Some appropriate
this first resurrection and reign to martyrs only: others enlarge it
to all the saints".
Now, Lord, where are we? What
reader doth not find himself lost in this wilderness of opinions
1 Or what living man can in such diversities of probable
judgments say, this, not the other, is the sense of the Holy Ghost?
It was a wise and true word of that father. Melius est dubitare
de occultis, quam litigare de incertis: "It is better to doubt
of things hidden, than to quarrel about things uncertain." And to
the same purpose is that discreet and moderato counsel of Deodati:
"In all this prophecy," saith he, "it is better and more sure to
expect and stay for the explication of the event, than to give it
without any certain ground:" which seasonable advice, if it had been
accordingly followed by many of our zealous compatriots, had saved
me the labour of this not overpleasing discourse.
Section VII.
But when I saw so many
well-minded Christians, by a croThe history of dulous trust of some
modern authority strongly chiiiMts'tnief- carried back into the
opinion of the ancient duly reported. liasts, which was so many
hundred years ago hooted out of the Christian tJhurch; and so
passionately affected therewith, as that they run themselves into
wild consequents, both of paradoxes in opinion and resolutions in
practice; I might not but break silence; and, if no more, yet
charitably to advise them to a safe suspension of judgment in a
matter so abstruse and altogether indeterminable.
It is
true, that it is not a matter of faith; neither imports salvation
either way: so as here can be no warrant for the violation of
charity, in over bitter censures of either the defenders or
oppugncrs of it: yet, withal, it must be granted to be such as, in
that form wherein it is maintained by some abettors, may draw in
some dangerous consectaries, both of act and opinion.
It
would be bootless for me to look back at the ancient heresy of the
milliaries, as Austin calls them, to show how that gross error,
which was first broached by the Epicurean, and, as Lindanus justly
calls him, Judaizing Cerinthus, was in a more tolerable sense taken
up, not long after, by Papias bishop of Hierapolis, reported by
Irenaeus to be an auditor of St. John and companion of Polycarpus, a
well-meaning man, but aiiUpos
Tov Vow, "of a
mean judgment," as he is styled; mente non acri, as
Nicephorus: which yet relished so ill with the Christians of those
times, as that this very passage of the
Revelation was deemed by them a probable ground to call the
divine authority of this whole book into question, as savouring too
much of Cerinthus; but the majesty, which shined in that holy
prophecy, soon dispelled that cloud, and induced the Church to find
a better sense of so obscure a clause than the merely literal.
Wherein yet some eminent
authors thought fit still to rest, as Irenaeus, Justin Martyr,
Tertullian, Lactantius: yea, we are told by that worthy and orthodox
Dionysius Alexandrinus, that Nepos, an Egyptian bishop, wrote a book
in those early times1 to this
purpose, which he called Elenchus Atlegoristaiiim*; wherein
he too grossly maintained that thousand years' reign in all earthly
pleasure and delicacy; seconded also by one Coracion, the then
famous ringleader of that sect: against whom that reverend and
holy Dionysius bent his style, in two books of the Promises of Godb;
confuting that Judaical and literal construction of the large
predictions of the outward happiness of the Church, now by some
revived: who, not without a preface of the high respects which he
gives to the author for his excellent parts and merits, effectually
oppugns his misraised opinion; and spends three days' conference
with Coracion to so good a purpose, as that he brought him, by
strength of argumentation, to cast away and recant his former error:
all which is fully laid forth by Eusebius0.
Yet after this, about the year
370, Apollinaris, that exploded heretic, revives this sect; and adds
this error to the company of many, much worse, defended by him:
which, say Baronius and Binius, was so condemned in him by a council
held at Rome about the year 373, ut posthac omnino conticuerit; "that
it never so much as whispered since:" but, as it is better observed
by Aretius, it held out to the times of Jerome and Augustin; who
upon all occasions refel it, and cry it down for a Jewish fable.
Ever since which time, till now
of late, there hath been no noise at all of it in the world; so as
it hath lien dead for this twelve hundred and forty years; and now
is raised up out of the grave of oblivion, by some that think
themselves wiser than their predecessors.
Section VIII.
But, forasmuch as it doth not
so greatly concern us to know The summary what in this case hath
been held by former opinionrelation of the ists, as what is now
insisted upon for the present .
doctrine of the ...... , , .
late milieu- let us both
carefully inquire into the substance of anans. this uncouth doctrine
lately taken up by some of
our brethren, and unpartially
examine the grounds whereupon it is maintained.
And, for that I find none hath
laid forth this opinion so fully and confidently as a late London
divine, Mr. John Archerd; one
esteemed of so great sanctity and worth, as that no mean person
doubted not to file him amongst men as precious as any the earth
bore in his time; I shall fearlessly take his word for the point in
1,
ncp! iirayys\uiv. with the Saints, shall visibly possess a
c
Eccles. Histor. l. vii. c. 22, 23. [24. Monarchical State and
Kingdom in this
edit. Burton, 1845.] World."
Printed and sold by B. Allen,
4 In hia book of "The Personal Reign
anno 1643.—Mr. Archer abridged, con
of Christ on Earth; laying
forth and cerning Christ's Kingdom and Coming.
proving, that Jesus Christ,
together
hand; and shall first sum up
his doctrine concerning this subject, and then show the
improbabilities and incongruities of it: the rather, for that I
perceive his conceptions pass generally for the current tenet of the
fautors of this plausible opinion.
First then, he lays for his
foundation, that there is a threefold kingdom of Christ: one,
providential; which is that universal sovereignty by which Jesus
Christ manageth the affairs of all the world, both in heaven and
earth: another, spiritual; which is that sovereignty which he
exercises over the consciences of some people, and in special the
elect; subduing them, by his word and Spirit, to an universal
obedience of him: a third, monarchical; wherein Christ, when he
enters upon it, will govern as earthly monarchs do; that is,
universally over the world, and in a worldly, visible, and earthly
glory; not by tyranny and oppression, and sensually, but with honour,
peace, riches, and whatsoever in and of the world is not sinful: so
as Christ shall administer this sovereignty over all the earth in a
visible and worldly manner, for splendour, riches, peace, &c.,
though not in a fleshly or sinful manner.
He
thence descends to the consideration of the manner of this kingdom
of Christ both in the extent and qualities of it.
The extent of it he makes to be
unto all reasonable creatures; angels, devils, and men: showing that
the high ones of the earth, kings and their monarchies, shall fall
before the Lord. Both sun and moon, i.e. majesty of an higher and
lower rank, shall vanish before him. He shall change all worldly
custom; and so all kingly glory; and set up a new, even his own
glory.
Secondly, for the opening of
the quality of it, he makes a double day of judgment: one, strictly
taken, for a partial judgment of some, not all; wherein many, both
saints and sinners, shall be judged, and that with great terror and
solemnity: the other, general; wherein all men and devils shall be
judged; bringing a world of saints and sinners first to the bar of
that more partial and strictly-taken judgment, long before the last
and general day. But even that former shall be, he saith, a general
judging (though not to the second death) of all the ungodly in the
world; at least of all that will not stoop to Christ's sceptre :
and, secondly, a judging to the saints alive, who shall be blamed
for their former failings.
Now these two times and degrees
of judgment begin and end Christ's kingdom or monarchies: so as all
the time of his reign may fitly be called a
day of judgment; wherein there is an evening and morning, answerable
to the natural day.
In
the evening, or first part of Christ's kingdom, there is first an
end, or withdrawing and ceasing of the light and glory of the
foregoing day: so Christ's kingdom shall begin with the withdrawing
of peace and comfort, and in following darkness; in that, great
trouble shall begin to arise upon those who shall be the subjects of
Christ's monarchy, both believing Gentiles and Jews, with Israelites
or the ten tribes, who shall be all converted, and greatly troubled.
But when that trouble is at the height, then comes the beginning of
Christ's kingdom.
At
the first setting up then of this kingdom, Christ shall come from
heaven visibly, even as he went thither: which yet is not his last
coming to the last judgment, but a middle coming betwixt the two
other.
For Christ, he saith, hath
three comings: the first, when he came to take our nature; the
second, when he comes to receive his kingdom, for the receiving of
which he went to heaven; the third, when he comes to judge all, and
end the world.
This second coming of Christ
shall be long before his coming to the last judgment.
In
which second coming Christ will do these three things:
First, he will raise up the
saints which are dead before this his coming: not only such as have
been martyred, as some think; but all saints, who have died in the
faith: for which cause he is said to come with all his saints, Zech.
xiv. 5. But all the dead, which are not saints, shall lie still in
the dust till the last and general judgment, for the second death.
The saints which thus are raised in the first resurrection shall not
return to a mortal state of body again, nor yet be so perfectly
glorified as they shall be afterwards; for then the people on earth
could not bear their presence, for they shall shine as the sun: but
they shall be in a middle state, betwixt glory and mortality; as
Christ was after his resurrection, before his ascension.
Secondly, he will destroy the
wicked people on earth; for they, about the time of his coming,
shall combine against the saints, and then will Christ suddenly
surprise them to their ruin. Now this ruin of the wicked shall not
be as yet universal to every one, only now he will ruin the armies
of them; and so he will break the head and the arm of them, as it
was with the Egyptians at the Red sea, and the rest he will make
slaves to the churches.
And it seems that some wicked
shall be left for a seed to these nations; because, by the end of
Christ's kingdom, Gog and Magog shall rise against the saints; which
cannot arise out of such as prove hypocrites or excommunicated, for
there shall be none such there; but these wicked ones left shall be
the nations ruled with iron, Rev. ii. 26, 27.
Thirdly, he shall examine,
blame, and shame the saints who are alive at his coming, if they be
found to have walked loosely. He will not kill them, nor change them
in a moment, but shame them: therefore Peter exhorts to be holy,
that we be not blamed at his coming, 2 Pet. iii. 11—14.
Section IX.
Now
when Christ hath thus done, and put his kingdom into Mr. Archer's
form, he will withdraw to heaven again, and leave opirnon con- the
government to the dead saints raised up, among:
cermng Christ » , .
withdrawing whom the apostles
chall be chief: and they shall
again^and the
nave tne
government of those saints which arc
government de- found alive; that is, they and all believers shall
sain^.with'their rule
tne world, in which the twelve tribes
shall be privileges. chief: and they shall not only rule as kings,
but as priests; that is, discipline their souls as well as their
bodies.
Now, for that it might seem to
be no small damage for the souls of saints dead to be fetched from
heaven to live again upon earth, with men, in their bodies; he tells
us, that it is likely the souls of the departed saints are not in
the highest heaven, but in a middle place, better than this world,
but inferior to the highest heaven; which place is meant by paradise
in the New Testament: which paradise, he conceives, to be below the
third heaven; and therefore, surely, to be in the region or element
of fire, where the sun and stars are, or in the highest region of
air, which is called heaven in scripture.
These saints' souls, fetched
from this paradise, and joined with their bodies raised from the
dead, (which is the first resurrection,) they rule Christ's kingdom,
even all of them, though some of them in more eminent place than
others.
The persons that shall be
governed, or the subjects of this kingdom, shall be all that live
upon earth; and the place they shall govern shall be the whole
world. The saints shall be ruled like the Israelites under Solomon;
the wicked, as slaves. Those ten of the twelve tribes that are lost,
shall be found out and made subjects of this
kingdom. The cities of the tribes shall be built again, especially
Jerusalem, which shall be the most eminent city then iu the world.
The Israelites shall be first raised to this glory, and at Jerusalem
will Christ begin to show himself; and from the Israelites shall
glory descend to the Gentiles.
The privileges of this kingdom
shall be wonderful. First, all the subjects of it, that are freemen,
shall be holy; and not seemingly saints, but true saints; not any
sinners. Nothing that defileth shall be there; no hypocrite; no
person excommunicated, as proving bad; nor any of the children of
these saints shall prove naught, but all shall be elect, and prove
saints, and the seed of the blessed: for if any of their issue
should prove hypocrites or wicked persons, it would so affect them,
that they should not have everlasting joy, neither could sorrow nor
sighing fly away. Now in these times there shall be no sorrow nor
weeping. They shall be edified immediately from God in Christ. The
sacrament is but to last till the next coming of Christ, to set up
his kingdom. Christ will hold them up in fulness of grace, though
not in full perfection of grace till the last general judgment, or
their translation to heaven. There shall be a full and present
answer to all their prayers, there being no sin to keep good things
from them. There shall be a fulness of all temporal blessings; as
peace, safety, riches, health, long life, or whatsoever can be had
in this world. They shall have exemption from all bodily troubles.
Every one shall live an hundred years; no infant, nor any other
shall die sooner. There shall be no sickness or grief to consume the
strength. Although a natural death shall be, yet there shall be no
violent or untimely death, by any grief, sickness, or trouble. Satan
shall be wholly restrained from tempting them to sin, or others to
trouble them. Original corruption shall be kept in, not to break
forth into any gross way. To which he adds, they shall not bo
infected with popery.
This for the
evening, or first part of Christ's kingdom.
Section X.
Now when this kingdom of Christ
hath lasted to many geneThe latter part rations, the slaves and
tributaries will be grown to rfewt multitudes. These, under the name
of Gog and forth by Mr. Ar- Magog, upon whom the devil sha.ll be let
loose, occasioned^ s^a^
De drawn by Satan to assault the
saints: which time of it. trouble shall not be long: it shall be
sudden and violent, but short. For Christ
shall suddenly come from heaven, and with fire kill all the wicked
ones, not leaving one of them alive upon earth.
This assault of the wicked will
Christ take for the occasion of his coming to the last and general
judgment: before which, he shall in a moment change the bodies of
all his saints that are not dead, but alive at his coming; and raise
up the dead bodies of the saints who lived and died during this
kingdom of Christ; and they, together with the changed saints, shall
meet the Lord Jesus in the air, coming again from heaven, never more
to be parted.
Then shall all the wicked be
raised up, from Cain to the last wicked man that is found on the
earth: and now shall be the judgment, which we call the day of
judgment; which being finished, the saints shall be carried with
Christ for ever into heaven, and the wicked sent with the devil into
hell: which hell shall not be the same which is now so called, but
another: this being now but as a prison; that, the place of
execution and torment; the hell that now is, serving only to reserve
condemned spirits, which have no bodies, till the execution at the
last day; at which time this hell shall cease, and be swallowed up.
The hell that shall be for torment shall be all this lower and
visible world of earth, waters, and the lower heavens, reduced by
God then to their first chaos of confusion.
Now this kingdom of Christ,
though for the evening, or the first part of it, it is expressly
determined to last a thousand years, or ten generations; yet the
dawning or latter part of it is not expressed in scripture how long
it shall endure, but doubtless will last a long time: and though
called but a day of judgment, yet it may last a thousand years, as
the other is to do; because this is the time in which God's mercy,
justice, truth, power is to be gloriously revealed before all men
and devils, so as every sinner is to be silenced in his reasonings,
or convinced; which must require much time. Secondly, this is the
time in which Jesus Christ is to triumph and lord it over all
reasonable creatures, to be worshipped and acknowledged by every one
in heaven, earth, and under the earth. Thirdly, the solemnity of it
were to little purpose if it were not to last long; as we deride
great preparations and pomp for a short show. Lastly, every act of
reasonable creatures being immortal, shall not only abide for ever
in heaven or hell, but be revived and brought forth in that day
before all the world; and all these acts,
from Adam to the last of mankind, shall bo orderly and clearly
proceeded in by books, as in a court of justice.
When all this is done, and the
final sentence pronounced upon all creatures, both blessed and
cursed, then will Christ resign his kingdom to the Father; and this
world, together with his kingdom, shall end.
For the beginning of this
monarchy of Christ, it must be set up, saith he, the last in the
world, after the other four are past whereof the Roman is the last;
that being divided into the eastern and western monarchy; and out of
the western, ten horns or kingdoms arising; and, among them, another
little horn most blasphemous, which is the papacy. When these ten
kingdoms and the papacy shall be put to an end, then is the
beginning of this kingdom of Christ; which, saith ho, by comparing
of Daniel with the Revelation, shall
be anno 1666; the number of the beast, only the thousand, because it
comes seldom, left out. Three years and an half before this 1666,
the papal power shall have support in Europe: all the ten kingdoms
apostatizing to popery, and yet one of them shall return to the
truth. In the years of Christ 1650 or 1656, the Israelites are to be
delivered, by being called to Christianity; both Jews which were two
tribes, and the ten tribes of Israel: both which shall, after their
conversion for fortyfive years after, suffer great trouble from
Mahometans, heathens, papists. Upon all which computations, it is
likely, saith he, that Christ's coming from heaven, and the raising
the dead, and beginning his kingdom, and the thousand years, will be
about the year of our Lord 1700, for it is to be about forty-five
years after 1650 or 1656.
Now it being found out when
Christ's kingdom, or the thousand years, shall begin, it is easy, he
saith, to guess when the time of the last general judgment and the
world's end shall be; which neither angel, nor Christ himself as
man, did, in those days, when the disciples asked the question,
know; for it was locked up in the Father's secrets. But after
Christ's sufferings and ascension, all the Father's secrets were
revealed to him; for he was worthy; and he reveals them to the
churches by John; opening the meaning of Daniel's time, times,
and half a time, which no creature could expound to beforty-two
months, or onethousand two hundred and sixty days. He
tells us expressly, that his kingdom should last, after it was fully
settled, a thousand years, and then should be a little
disturbance; so as we have some comfort, that there is hope the
troubles of us Gentile-Christians shall cease about 1666; but till
those days we are like to see sad times, for it is to be feared that
popery shall again overrun Europe, and bring back under papal power
every king in Europe, and suppress all their opposers in every
kingdom. By this revolting of the kingdoms to popery, it comes that
the witnesses are slain and lie dead in the streets. But ere
Antichrist can have time to triumph four years, the witnesses shall
be raised up, and one of the ten kingdoms fall off from him, and
ruin the city of Rome. But yet the papacy shall breathe, and by
degrees get head, and join with Turk, Tartar, and the Christians in
Europe; but from this danger will Christ save all Christians by his
coining, and setting up of his kingdom.
Section XI. Thus have
I faithfully related the opinion, and summarily conThat strain of
tracted the larger discourse, of Mr. Archer: who, runB through upon
the grounds of Alstedius and Mede, runs his the whole dis-
own descant plausibly enough; for
every clause of
course of Mr. , .
r„. J
B . .' ,
Archer and his tractate calling
up the testimomes of the sacred
is the common
8criptUre.
ground of this r
misopinion. The several
allegations whereof upon every pass
age, I could be most willing
thoroughly to scan, if I had less care to spare myself than the
reader.
For whose satisfaction, that l
may be neither unpardonably tedious, nor in any sort deficient in
the managing of this subject, l shall, first, show that universal
strain and ground of error which runs through the whole writing of
this author; then, I shall note some of the chief of those bold
paradoxal and unwarrantable assertions which I meet with in this
opinion and discourse; in the third place, I shall lay forth those
strangely improbable consequents which will inevitably follow upon
both; and, lastly, I shall subjoin such fair, safe, and orthodox
constructions as may be warrantably admitted of that dark passage of
scripture, the misprision whereof is guilty of this controversy.
For the first, that which is
the general fault, not of this author only, but of all other that
look towards the millenary way, and indeed the main ground of all
their heterodoxy in this point, is, that they put a merely literal
construction upon the prophecies and promises of scripture, which
the Holy Ghost intended only to be spiritually understood.
Hence it is, that those
frequent predictions which we meet in every page of the prophets
concerning the kingdom of Christ, the reedifying of the Jewish
cities, the pomp and magnificence of restored Israel, their large
privileges and marvellous achievements, are altogether drawn to a
gross, corporal, and syllabical sense; which the judgment of the
whole Christian Church, seconded by the event, hath upon good
grounds ever construed not of the letter but the spirit.
I
remember some thirty years or more ago a learned gentleman, an
eminent Serjeant at Iawe, a man very skilful in the holy tongue, and
that professed no less acquaintance with the laws of God than of
man, published a large volume concerning, not the imminent
conversion only, but also the royal state of the Jews, their
absolute and universal monarchy, their awful sovereignty over all
the kings of the earth, the glory of their empire, the splendour of
their court and cities; gathering up to this purpose all the
glorious promises which occur every where in the prophets: at the
sight whereof, that deeply judicious king James of precious memory
was highly offended; and, after the perusal of some offensive
passages, commanded me, then attending him, to carry the book to the
synod at Westminster then sitting, for their censure; who, upon a
serious examination, with much zeal unanimously sentenced it to a
speedy suppression, as that which did hcerere in cortice, and
savoured too strong of the flesh, as being too servilely addicted to
the letter.
And now those very texts, whose
misunderstanding hath hitherto led the Jews into a fool's paradise,
by expecting an earthly glory, are no less confidently taken up by
the favourers of this opinion, as the main ground of their defence.
For instance, the Lord, by his
prophet Zechariah, hath said, The Lord shall inherit Judah his
portion in the holy land, and shall choose Jerusalem again. Sing and
rejoice, O daughter of Zion: for, lo, I come, and will dwell in the
midst of thee, saith the Lord, Zech. ii. 12, i o: this is, by
the author of " Zion's Joy," applied to that repaired and happy
estate of the city of Jerusalem, at this second coming of Christ in
glory: whereas the prophet only foretells the restoration of that
city and country after their then present captivity; and under that
figure describes the comfortable condition of the evangelical
Church.
e
[Sir Henry Finch, serjeant at law, author of "The world's great
restauration, or the Calling of the Jewes."]
So
again, by the prophet Isaiah, God saith, I will bring forth a
seed out of Jacob, and out ofJudah an inheritor of my mountain: and
mine elect shall inherit it, and my servants shall dwell there,
Isa. lxv. 9. This the same author cites, in a literal way, to make
good the resettlement of the Jews in that ancient city of their
inheritance.
Why doth he not as well add
that which followeth 1 And Sharon shall be a fold of flocks, and
the valhy ofAchor a place for the herds to lie down in. But ye are
they that forsake the Lord, that forget my holy mountain.
Surely, if one of them be applicable to the new Jerusalem, the other
must be so also.
The truth is, these prophecies
have their reference either to God's merciful dealing with Jerusalem
upon their return from their Babylonish captivity, or, by an usual
allegory, express his gracious purpose to the Church under the
gospel, without any respect at all to an earthly reestablishment of
the Jewish nation in their long-since forgotten possessions.
It
were as easy as tedious to pass through all those scriptures which
are wont to be alleged in this case: whereof I dare say there is
scarce any one whose either words or context do not evidently bewray
their misapplication; or, if that did not, yet the event would;
forasmuch as the time is now at hand, wherein these promises of the
general call and outward magnificence of these ancient people of God
should, according to the construction of our new Chiliasts, be
either well forward or accomplished, as we shall see in the sequel;
whereas there is not yet the least motion towards it in all the
world. Besides, some of their misconstrued texts will necessarily
cross the way of us, upon occasion of the several passages which we
are about to examine.
Section XII. Of
paradoxes, let it be the first, but not the least, that Christ, The
first para- ^he ^on of God, now
glorified, shall come and perdox of millena- sonally set up and
administer a monarchical state narehical state of
a kingdom here upon earth, in a
visible and of Christ's king- WOrldl
v manner for splendour, riches, peace, &c.
dom in a visi-
r .
We and worldly I had thought we
had heard him say, My kingmanner-
dom is not of this world. Now to what world do
riches and honour and earthly
contentments belong, if not to this? If he govern as earthly
monarchs have done, in a worldly, visible, earthly glory, (such are
the words,) how is his kingdom not of this
BP.
HALL, VOL. vill. T
world? Surely, this is more
than ever the very Jews expected or dreamed of. They have looked for
a Messiah that should exercise kingly authority in the world; but
they never looked for a glorified Messiah to come down from heaven
to rule upon earth. Zebedee's wife certainly never thought of such a
kingdom, wherein her sons should be the primere peers. Neither did
the good thief think of such a state when he said, Lord, remember
me when thou comest into thy kingdom. We have heard of an
absolute sovereignty of Christ, as God; of a delegated sovereignty,
as Mediator: we have heard of his rule in the heart, of his rule in
the Church: but of his monarchical rule in the world, for a whole
thousand years, in a worldly, visible, earthly glory, we never yet
heard, and think it very strange news to Christian ears. But much
more strange news it is, that all the prophets, since the world
began*, have spoken of this marvellous monarchy, and yet, that
we never heard of it in the writings of all the fathers and doctors
of the Christian Church, till this day. It is no whit strange, that
God's people should be abused by the feigned glosses of men, drawing
those scriptures, which speak of Christ's coming to the final
judgment of the world, to the sense of that imaginary kingdom, which
hath being no where but in their own brain. But without any
intention of a formal confutation, I purpose only to give some light
touches at those paradoxal and unwarrantable positions which meet
with me in this discourse.
That, in this visible monarchy
of Christ, he shall change all Second aradox-
wor^ly customs, and put down all
kingly power —the change and greatness, however just, and set up a
new; so
cuatomandpot- **
t^iere
sna^ ke no
more lor<k
Dut he; even as ting down
king- the earthly monarchies swallowed all kingly power y Pow
under them; may well pass for a sufficient paradox.
We grant, indeed, there shall
be none in competition with him, even in his spiritual rule; but
that there shall be none in subordination to him in his supposed
visible monarchy were too bold a word.
That there shall be a double
judgment, one a thousand years Third paradox: before the other: the
one, wherein many, both saints — a double and sinners, shall be
judged, and that with great ju gmen . terror and solemnity, which
shall be a general
judging (though not to the
second death) of all the ungodly in the world; at least of all that
will not stoop to Christ's sceptre: the
other, of all devils and men, upon the expiration of those thousand
years, in that universal appearance before God at that great days,
is an assertion as bold as groundless.
We
have heard of a particular doom passing upon every soul immediately
upon the parting from this house of clay; and of a general
judicature in those common assizes of the world; but of a middle
sessions, betwixt both these, in which all the ungodly shall be
arraigned, and sentenced to a temporal death or perpetual vassalage,
was never either spoken of by God or heard of by men.
Section XIII.
That there is a threefold
coming of Christ: the first, when he came to take our nature; the
second, when he comes dox:—a'three- to receive his kingdom; the
third, when he comes
ChristTM"18
of to
iudse
alI ancl
end tne
world; mav
welI for
a paradox, not inferior to the
rest.
Besides the metaphorical
comings of Christ to any soul or nation, whether in mercy or
judgment, we have ever heard of one coming of our Saviour, past, in
human weakness; another, to come, in divine power and glory: but
that there should be a .third coming down from heaven to earth,
betwixt these, is strange news to Christian ears; which were
heretofore wont to be inured to our old Apostolic, Athanasian, and
Nicene Creeds; and to hear, "From thence shall he come to judge the
quick and the dead." No coming, therefore, till he come to judgment:
and, that there may be no thought of an intermediate and partial
judgment in the beginning of that thousand years, the Creed, which
we were wont to profess in our baptism, ran thus; "We believe, that
in the end of the world he shall come to judge the quick and the
dead:" lo, in the end of the world, not a thousand years before it.
Let all good Christians stick close to their old Creeds, the
faith which was once delivered to the saints, Jude 3, and not
suffer themselves to be carried away with every gale of new
doctrine. That of Tertullian is a sure rule, Primum verum,
"The first is true."
Necessarily depending upon this, is that other gross conceit of
Fifth paradox- a doublo general
resurrection: the one, of those —a double re- saints which were dead
before this coming of Christ, Mimcii n. which
shall be raised up 1000 years before the rest,
![[ocr errors]](http://books.google.com/books?id=WeI8AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA323&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&q=inauthor:%22Joseph+Hall%22+The+Revelation+Unrevealed&cds=1&sig=ACfU3U04jmcKfyumrIGha41UlUJHB0RKbQ&edge=0&edge=stretch&w=64&h=11&ci=401,1362,157,24)
at his next coming; the other,
of all flesh at the end of the world, and the final coming and
judgment11.
But whether that first
resurrection shall be only proper and peculiar to martyrs that have
died for the name of Christ, or common to all the saints, let our
Chiliasts argue amongst themselves. Their opinions do no less
disagree from each other than they all from the truth. Alas, good
Martha, thou wert much deceived when thou saidst concerning thy
brother Lazarus, / know he shall rise again in the resurrection,
at the last day, John xi. 24: why, woman, the resurrection of
that saint, thy brother, shall be 1000 years sooner than thou
thoughtest of. Neither did St. Paul ever take notice of this first
resurrection of the saints, while he adjures his Timothy, before
God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, wlu> shall judge the quick and the
dead at his appearing, 2 Tim. iv. 1; for surely the Lord Jesus's
judging of the quick and dead, indefinitely spoken, must suppose a
resurrection of all the dead whom he judgeth: but here, saith the
Chiliast, is only in Christ's next appearing a resurrection of the
dead saints, and a judging of none but the wicked which are found
alive; for their raising out of their graves is reserved for the
last and universal judgment; so as by that rule Christ should not at
his appearing judge both the quick and the dead.
Section XIV.
Answerable to this double resurrection is the paradox of Christ's
Sixth paradox . threefold ascension into heaven: for, saith the au
—athreefoldas- thor, when
Christ hath thus put his kingdom into
censionofChrist - . ... .., , »
.. . ,
into heaven,pp. form, he will
withdraw from earth to heaven again,
a31
»4- and leave the government to the dead saints raised
up; they and all believers
shall rule the world.
And if these all shall govern,
who are those that shall be
governed? There are none left
upon earth but saints raised to
immortality; and saints found
alive, who are perfect believers;
and some few slaves, spared
from death for servitude. See now
what an honourable employment
and singular privilege and
honour here is, for saints
immortalized, and translated from
death to life, to be the
governors of some sturdy and rebellious
vassals I In the mean time
Christ, the glorious King of his
Church, is returned back into
heaven, and will govern the earth
by his deputies. What a mean
conceit is this which these men profess to have of the King of
eternal glory! that he, who hath said, Behold, I am with you
always, even until the end of the world, whose majesty fills
heaven and earth, should come down to put on his kingdom here below,
to be governed by certain delegates, and then withdraw to his
heaven: what is this but poorly to circumscribe the infinite Majesty
of heaven within the terms of a finite administration! And now, in
this second ascension, we hear no news of the attendance of his
retinue: he that brought down the souls of his saints to wait upon
him in this descent, for the receiving of this inferior kingdom,
shall leave them behind him with their old (but new raised)
partners, to spend i ooo years upon earth; at the end whereof, he
shall come down again, and fetch them up with him, in his third
ascension, to the highest heaven. What an high presumption is this
in flesh and blood, to send the Son of God, the Lord Jesus, from
heaven to earth, and from earth to heaven, upon an errand of their
own making! when himself, in his holy scriptures, never speaks but
of a double ascent of Christ: the one, which is past, from mount
Olivet, (where the impressions of his sacred feet are still said to
be), forty days after his resurrection; the other, future, when,
after the general judgment of the world, he shall carry up all the
elect with him to his heavenly glory.
Section XV. A literal
interpreter is no other than a slave to his syllables, Seventh para-
binding himself up to a mere sound of words, with dox:—the total
neglect of the true sense intended; which is too
reduction of the , , . . . _. .
.
ten lost tribes well seen in
this present subject. Ihe subjects of of Israel. ^nis
kingdomi
if any may
De sucn
where all are
either princes or slaves, are
to be the twelve tribes of the Jews and the nations of the Gentiles.
What if ten of those twelve tribes be lost 1 they shall be
found again, and be made saints, that they may become subjects; for
else they should but be found out for a worse confusion. So, then,
the cities of the tribes shall be built again, and inhabited by
natural Israelites'; especially Jerusalem, which shall be the most
eminent city in the world, or that ever was in the world; and at
Jerusalem will Christ begin to show himself: and then, by and from
the Israelites, shall glory descend to the Gentiles. Thus runs the
letter.
But
the best interpreter, St. Paul, tells us of a Jew outwardly,
and a Jew within; of circumcision in the flesh, and
circumcision of the heart; of circumcision in the spirit,
and in the letter*; of children of the flesh, and
children of the promise^. Which distinction whosoever shall have
duly digested will easily find how wild a paradox it is to tie those
frequent and large promises of the prophets made to Judah and
Israel, Zion and Jerusalem, to a carnal literality of sense; and to
make account of their accomplishment accordingly, which were never
otherwise than spiritually meant: and thereupon to affirm, as this
author doth, that even those ten tribes of Israel, which were, 2340
years ago, so dispersed, as the dust with the wind, that no man
could since their dissipation say of any one of them, "This was an
Israelite," neither have they now any known being in the world, that
they should be suddenly fetched up again, out of the forlorn rubbish
of paganism and Mahometism, wherein they are in many hundred
generations irrecoverably long since lost, and made the founders and
citizens of a new and more glorious Jerusalem, credat Judceus
Apella. It is true, that nothing is impossible to an omnipotent
power: had the Almighty said the words to their sense, no difficulty
could hinder our assent: he can as easily raise Israelites out of
Turks, Tartars, Indians, as out of their graves: but wo know the
sense of these prophetical promises and predictions to be, as that
father said, in medulla, not in superficie. In this
just construction, there is no Jew but a Christian; and Jerusalem is
built up, not in the soil of old Jebus, but in the hearts of be.
Hovers. Shortly, that we may clearly evince the moral impossibility
at least of this misconceit of the reduction and flourishing estate
of all the twelve tribes wholly converted to Christ their King, and
the magnificent reedifying of Jerusalem, the event is instead of a
thousand arguments. It is but the next year, 1650, or at farthest
56, which this author, comparing Daniel with John according to his
own calculation, hath pitched for the performance of these great
matters concerning the Jewish people: in which, saith he, the
Israelites are to be delivered, by being called to Christianity;
both the Jews which are two tribes, and the Israelites which are ten
tribes, &c. And now where is the man that can tell us tidings but of
a thrave of Jews newly converted, or of one stone laid in the new
foundation of the new Jerusalem? so as the issue plainly tells our
millenarian brethren thev have misk
Rom. ii. 28, 29. 1 Rom. ix. 8.
taken their aim, and sends them
to seek for a truer and more verifiable sense.
Section XVI.
Well may it pass for a further
paradox, that the dead saints Eighth para- now raised to an immortal
life, shall, in those their fnthri/giori^ spiritual
bodies—so the apostle calls them—meddlo and immortal with the
outward administration of the affairs of dling with their tne
Church, and have continual conversation with earthly affaire. mortal
men; controlling their actions, and ordering their processes
according to their secular occasions.
We
find that, in the attendance of Christ's resurrection, many of the
dead saints rose out of their graves, and went into the holy
city, and appeared to manym: but
that they ever offered to touch with any either secular or sacred
business, we never find. These ecclesiastical services, how holy
soever, are too mean for so glorious agents. And if they shall
manage them, how and in what fashion shall they govern? shall they
abate any thing of the privileges of their glory and immortality?
shall they be always visible? shall they be clothed or naked? since
clothes are only to hide shame, and to defend from the injuries of
the air; and there can be no place for shame in an immortalized
body, and amongst saints, where there shall be no sin: and since
their raised bodies are now impassible, and apt to the quick motions
of spiritual substance, shall they confine themselves to these low
places upon earth, and not lodge when they please in their former
paradise 1
Section XVII.
As
for thoso living saints, who, if any at all, must be their Ninth
paradox: subjects, in what an impossible condition doth he sainS
Imortal make them! They must bo
mortal, and yet sinless, and yet sinless. What man or angel can
reconcile these two? They must still have original corruption in
them—that cannot bo denied; but it shall be so yoked and restrained,
that it shall get little or no ground of them.
What a paradox is this! If
little, if any at all, surely they are sinners: and sin, wherever,
whatever it be, defileth! now nothing that defileth or
worketh abomination shall be there, Rev. xxi. 27. None shall be
in this kingdom but such as shall bo saved, such as are elected: but
is it the privilege of elccti m to exempt from sin? I had thougl
tthe fruit of God's gracious election had been the
"1
Matt. xxvii. 52,53.
remission, not the freedom from
the commission of sin. All here shall be saints: no one, he saith,
shall bo an hypocrite": O happy kingdom, where there is no taint of
hypocrisy! But shall men have hearts then? and are not the hearts of
men deceitful above all things? Though Satan be never so close
chained up, yet the innate corruption of that deceitful heart is
able enough to breed store of hypocrisy. But what news is it, that
no person excommunicate shall be there? what place can there be
possibly imagined for an excommunication in a kingdom, after a sort
heavenly, wherein there shall be no use of sacraments? no use of any
other ordinances? wherein all shall immediately feed from God in
Christ? wherein Christ will hold them all up in fulness of grace"?
Yea, when there shall therefore be no use of pastors, doctors,
elders, deacons, preaching, censures in this holy and glorious
estate, what spiritual government is that which the raised saints
shall exercise in the new Jerusalem? Neither shall the persons only
of the then-living saints be freed from depravation by sin, but all
their children, in all the succeeding generations: none of them
shall prove bad; none reprobate: all shall be called the seed of the
blessed. What! though they be begotten and conceived in sin? what!
though they propagate sin to the fruit of their loins? yet their
issue shall not prove sinners. As much as to say, there shall be
fire, but neither heat nor smoke: there shall be a poisonous
fountain, but it shall yield no unwholesome water. Neither can there
be any danger of their languishing in grace, though they have
neither word nor sacraments. Neither shall they have use of any
improvement by the heavenly counsel or examples of those glorious
and immortal saints which they shall converse with, which one would
think should avail much to tho continuation and increase of their
holiness; but they shall have an immediate fellowship with God, and
shall be edified immediately from God in ChristP. But what! shall
there be any use of their prayers? are not those a part of God's
ordinances? and the fellowship, he saithi, which they shall have
with God is not by ordinances, but by God and the Lamb: and what
need they pray for that, which they do indefeasibly enjoy? However,
let it be scored up for none of the least paradoxes, that God's
ordinances should be useless unto God's people any where out of
heaven.
»
Page 27. "Pp. 17, 29. P
Pp. 28, 29. <i Page 29.
Section XVIII.
That under this monarchy of
Christ there shall be to the saints Tenth para- *or
a thousand years all fulness of all
temporal blessdox:—the ful- ings; as peace, safety, riches, health,
long life, and
ness of all tem-'
poral blessings, whatsoever
else was enjoyed under any monarchy, of riches, hon-
or can
De had
m the
world, or may make their
our, long life, *
under this mo- lives
comfortable, savoureth too strong of a Jewish Christ' 0f
or Mahometan paradise; as being
extended, in a fairer and more modest expression, to those carnal
pleasures, both of the bed and the board, which have been dreamed of
by those sensual Turks and Talmudists.
It is
true, that God hath been as exceeding rich in mercies, as no less
large in promises of all blessings to the children of the kingdom:
but those riches and delights are of another nature, purely
spiritual; such as may be proper for the fruition of saints. As for
those outward favours, they are such as the worst may have, and the
best may want: such, as that a man may be happy without them, and he
that enjoys them most miserable: such as, wise Solomon tells us,
bewray neither the love nor hatred of the Almighty'.
And surely if Gog and Magog did not find themselves enabled with
strength and health of body, with vigour of spirits, with outward
wealth and power, they would never offer, during the time of that
kingdom, to rise up against the saints in an open war. Shortly, we
know the kingdom of God doth not consist in meats and
drinks, in houses and lands, in mines and metals, in flocks and
herds ; but in righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy
Ghost, Rom. xiv. 17. The enjoyment of good things for a moment
is scarce to be reckoned amongst blessings; since the grief of their
cessation doth more than counterpoise the contentment of their
fruition. But here, a long life shall make up the happiness of the
rich, honourable, frolic patriots of this new kingdom; for not one
of them shall die early. What! not though it be to be translated
from mortality to eternal blessedness? Is it an advantage to be held
off long from heaven? But who told this man, that no one should die
under 100 years old? It is true, he finds in the letter of Isaiah,
There shall be no more thence an infant of days, nor an old man
that hath not filled his days; for the child shall die an hundred
years old, Is. lxv. 20: but he might have found also in the next
words preceding, In Jerusalem the voice of weeping s/iall be no
more heard, nor the
'Eccl. ix.
1.
voice of crying, ver.
19. Well, then, the husband or wife or child must die at the last:
and shall there be no tear shed for them? shall all the subjects be
exempted from all afflictions whatsoever; and yet be obnoxious to
death, the utmost of all terribles? And how doth that promise extend
to a freedom from all outward violences and inward sicknesses, grief
and trouble, which are the means and harbingers of dissolution; and
yet give way to that worst of evils to which all these are but the
gentle preparations? The truth then is, these are high allegorical
expressions, whereby it pleaseth the Spirit of God to set forth,
under bodily resemblances, whether the prosperous and comfortable
condition of the evangelical Church, or the happy estate of the
glorified children of the resurrection; which, whoso shall construe
literally, shall in vain expect to see the wolf and the lamb
to feed together, and the lion to eat straw like the
bullock, Isaiah lxv. 25.
Section XIX.
May it not well pass for a
further paradox, that, while there Eleventh para- are
Bo many thousand
saints reigning upon earth, dox :—that so and
enc|ueci
witn
so much majesty and power to
many thou- ,, , , , , ,.
sands of gio- govern the world,
the slaves and underling-tribu
mortal sainte
taries
sllould 00 suffered to grow up
under them,
reigning, the to such a head,
as to defy their governors, and to
and tribute- bid battle to all
those immortal rulers, any one
ries, should be whereof were
able to quell a world of weak sinable to raise war against ners.
them-
Who can think that the malice of these men
should so far exceed their wit,
as that, knowing, by long and daily experience, that these raised
and glorious saints, under whose iron sceptre they lived, are
immortal, and utterly impassible, they should yet hold it safe or
possible to oppose them with any hope of success? And if, to make
the matter more credible, it shall be suggested, as it is by this
author, that they are drawn in by some deceitful trick of Satan;
they could not but know the wisdom and knowledge of these glorious
saints to be such, as that they might, much better than the apostle,
say, We are not ignorant of his devices; so as, if Gog and
Magog shall hope, either by wiles or violence, to prevail against
invulnerable, spiritual, and half glorified powers, they shall
approve themselves more mad than malicious. And to make this paradox
perfect, how strange is the intimation, that this shall be taken for
the occasion of Christ's coming the third
time to his general judgment; even the ruin of these assailants,
whom he will come from heaven to destroy! as if this witless and
vain insurrection of Gog and Magog could not be suddenly and
powerfully crushed by so over-puissant opposites: as if the blowing
upon all the legions of earth and hell could not scatter them in an
instant: as if one of God's mighty angels, who, in one night,
destroyed an hundred fourscore and five thousand Assyrians8,
could not as easily turn Gog and Magog into heaps or ashes; and yet
the Son of God still keep his heaven.
Section XX.
The third time, then, he saith,
Christ shall come down from Twelfth para- heaven to earth, for his
final judgment of the dox:—the day world: the day whereof shall dawn
immediately
of judgment to . . . , , . *
hold a thousand upon the
expiration of the thousand years reign; ye*"•- but may, for aught he
knows, last another thou
sand years, as the former. The
scripture- indeed, he confesses sets not down the time how long it
shall last; but long, certainly, it must last.
And why so very long! and what
do we talk of years, when the angel before this swore that time
should be no more? What a bold weakness is this, to measure the
infinite God by ourselves! The necessity of the length of that time
of judgment is evinced, he saith, by the great work to be
accomplished in it: for therein God's mercy, justice, truth, power,
&c. is to be gloriously revealed before all mankind and devils; and
the truth of every scripture cleared; and sinners silenced or
convinced. And, secondly, this is the time in which Christ Jesus is
to triumph and lord it over all reasonable creatures, and wherein
every knee shall bow to him: as if the Almighty should be limited to
do his acts by leisure: as if he, that made the world in six days,
and could have made it in an instant, cannot as well in that space
of time judge it. Alas! what is time, but a poor circumstance of
finite mortality; not reaching up to the acts of the Eternal 1
That Ancient of Days may not have his workings confined to
hours, days, months, years: and justly do we say, that he, who is of
himself one most pure and simple act, works in an instant: he can
therefore gloriously reveal his justice, truth, power, to men and
devils, without any such leisurely respirations: and if in an
instant he can raise all flesh from their graves, why should we
question whether he cannot as soon judge them? As for the * 2
Kinm xix. 35. * Page 39.
triumph of the Lord Jesus over
all his enemies, as it is partly accomplished already, when he
ascended up on high, and led captivity captive; so shall
it be fully perfected in the act of his last judgment, when his foes
shall be made his footstool, without any such lingering forms of a
protracted solemnity. For the performance whereof, it is supposed by
this author, and his contests in opinion, that whereas the Lord
Jesus, in his first coming down from heaven, stayed not full
thirty-four years upon earth; and, in his second coming down,
continued his visible presence amongst men, but till he had settled
his government here in the world, and then returned to his heaven;
now, upon his third descent to judgment, shall, for some thousand
years, remain visibly upon earth, out of the local heaven from
whence he descended: a conceit that would have sounded very
strangely in the ears of our unenlightened forefathers; who were
ever wont to conceive, that this great business of the last
judgment, being managed by the infinite wisdom and power of the Son
of God, should be of a speedy despatch; and that their returning
Saviour should come to fetch up the bodies and souls of his elect to
the instant fruition of their glory in heaven, not to call them to a
thousand years' attendance on his visible presence here on earth;
and if they found the thrones set, and the books opened, and all the
process out of records, they were wont to construe these expressions
as such wherein the Spirit of God meant to condescend to our
weakness, setting forth his own incomprehensible acts, by the forms
of our human judicatures, which must necessarily both take up time
and require open evidences and convictions, whereof there is no more
use when we speak of an infinite God, than of parchments, scribes,
registers.
Section XXI.
Well, then, towards the end of
the second thousand years, the Thirteenth para- judgment 1s
ended, the final sentence passed both dox:—a new of life and death,
the elect are carried up to their of^douMeheir bliss, the wicked
sent to their place; both settled and the place in their eternity.
K '" But here, I confess, I stand
amazed at the confi
dent and peremptory assertion
of this author, and other favourers of his opinion, concerning the
place of the present and future hell. Doubtless, the departed souls
of wicked and unrepentant sinners are not in custody only, but in
torture; as being both separated eternally from the face of that God
in whose presence is the fulness
of joy, and seized upon immediately by the dreadful executioners
of divine vengeance: although not in that full exquisiteness of
torment which awaits for them in that great day, when their bodies,
which were partners with them in their crimes, must also partake of
their everlasting punishments. Tophet, we know, is prepared of old;
and there is a peculiar place of unconceivable horror for the devil
and his angels and vassals: but where this place is I have not so
much warrant as to inquire, much less to determine. I must therefore
wonder whence these men receive their light: certainly, (that which
was denied to the damned glutton in the gospel,) no man hath been
sent thence to them, to inform them of these infernal regions of
darkness; and I am sure God hath nowhere revealed this to them in
his holy scripture. As not daring, therefore, so much as to scan
this point, much less to unlock so deep a secret, I lay my hand upon
my mouth in silence and dread; referring it to the glorious angel
that hath the keys of the bottomless pit, and leaving these bold and
curious dogmatists to their own conceits.
Section XXII. But
though I may well fear I have overwearied my reader
St andim-
Witn tnG
enumeration
of those ill-SOUnding paraprobable conse- doxes, which have not
incidently fallen from the lownuponftthUi
pens, but have been studiously maintained by the opinion and dU-
hands and tongues of the abettors of this millenary
course. . . - , ....
reign; yet I must crave leave
to put his patience to a further task, in viewing some of those
incommodious, misbecoming, and improbable consequents, which will
necessarily follow upon that opinion.
I
find, in a published letter from Dr. Twisse of Oxford to Mr. Mede of
Cambridge, that this subject was privately much agitated betwixt
those two learned divines; and that the doctor had furnished twelve
complete arguments against this tenet, which, if they could have
come to my hands, might both have given me light, and perhaps have
saved me labour. In the want of them, I shall insist upon some of
those harsh inferences which offer themselves to my thoughts.
Let the first be, that, in the
Lord's Prayer, we arc taught to i. That in the pray, Thy kingdom
comen: therefore we do therewe
pray fo/this m prav
for tne
accomplishing of this monarchical monarchy. and personal reign of
Christ with his saints on earth; when as,
both such a kingdom was never acknowledged nor believed by the
universal Church of Christ from that day till this hour; and it is
clear, that it was Christ himself, who taught the disciples herein
to pray to his Father for the accomplishing of his Father's kingdom,
which is merely spiritual; not for his own personal and visible, as
Mediator.
Secondly, how strangely doth it
hang together, that the Son of
2. That Christ God, in his
second coming with much terror for a in his second general judging
of all the ungodly in the world,
comrag to judge
0 °" .
the earth should shall yet
leave many wicked men alive to breed wfcked'men enemies to his
saints; to be slaves and tributaries alive. to them in their new
kingdom! For as for those
saints that are raised up from
the dead to an immortal estate, they can have no use of such
drudges. And for the saints living, either they shall know the
wicked courses of those surviving vassals or they shall not know
them: if they know them not, they shall be defective in their care
and oversight: if they do know them, they shall be afflicted with
the sight of their wickedness; according to the profession of the
Psalmist, Mine eyes gush out rivers of waters, because men keep
not thy law; and if so, they are not in that happy estate freed
from sorrow, which is strongly pretended, for in these times
there shall be no sorrow or weeping, Rev. xxi. 4.
Section XXIII.
Thirdly, there had need to be a firm ground whereon to build
3. That Christ, & belief of so
unlikely a truth, that the Son of God, who hath all
wl1o
a ljtt]e
before his ascension could say, All
power, should _ . * ,
descend from power is given
unto me, both in heaven and in
heaven to de- ^
and ^ ever
sj ru[es
tl!e
Qhurch by a
pute new go-
fc
vemors, &c. vicariate of his
Spirit, as Tertullian expresses it, according to that order of
government which he hath appointed; should now, the second time,
come personally down from heaven to depute new governors in this his
monarchy, and having settled the administration in their hands
should again take his leave of the earth. Further, if those of the
ungodly which will not stoop to the sceptre of Christ shall be the
subjects of his destruction", who can imagine that, when he shall
come in such heavenly glory and majesty, and in such astonishing
terror, there can be any person upon earth that will not readily
crouch unto him, and offer to lick the dust under his feet?
Moreover, if Christ shall come down, and after deputation of
governors ascend again into
* Archer, p. 13.
heaven, how can it be stood
upon, that this reign of his is personal for 1000 years upon earth?
since personal presence and deputation cannot stand together: there
may be a virtual presence of the prince, in delegation of power to
others; but a personal there cannot be.
Section XXIV.
Fourthly, if this new kingdom must consist of raised saints and
4.
The strange men living, what a strange composition shall here thu^magh^ef
be of
a government! what an unimaginable
comgovernment, mixture of subjects! what a con temperature of heaven
and earth! The bodies raised are spiritual; the living bodies,
fleshly; the raised saints, immortal; the saints living,
mortal, and at an hundred years dying. What kind of commerce shall
here be? how unequal! how unsuitable! How can it be other than a
disparagement, to creatures immortal and glorious, to be matched
with flesh and blood? How can it be but too much honour for mortal
and earthly creatures, ordinarily to consort with the blessed
denizens of paradise?
Fifthly, if all saints that
ever were before Christ's second
5. All saints: coming shall be
raised, and the wicked destroyed,
to'be'fou^on
and tne
samts then
fountl livinK
continued in the earth. world, how shall that be verified which was
spoken
by him who is the Truth:
When the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith upon the earth?
Sixthly, if all saints from the
first man Adam to the last that 6 If the apostles
expired
before Christ's coming, and all the believers shall sway this then
living, shall be rulers and princes y, who shall dothTtagreeto obey
1 And if amongst the raised saints, the apoour Saviour's
stles shall, in their sense, sit upon
twelve thrones,
words, It shall , , , .
, . .
not be to with and as a
monarchical state on earth judge the twelve y0ut
tribes of Israel, how is that verified which our
Saviour said to them, It
shall not be so with you?
Seventhly, what an apparent
disadvantage should this be to . ,. , the blessed souls of the
saints departed, to be
7. A disadvan- r'
tage to the souls fetched down
from heaven where they are in perheaven^to^be1
^ec'i
bliss, to spend a thousand years upon earth, fetcheddownto
ere the consummation of their glory!
to change the company of angels for men, heaven for earth! To which
main and choking objection there is wont to be offered a double
solution.
y Archer, p. 8.
Firstz,
were those departed souls in the highest heaven, yet it becomes
them, as the angels do, to come down to serve the saints; and, with
Lazarus's spirit, to return to their bodies again, at the
commandment of Christ. True: all creatures owe their obedience to
their Maker and Redeemer; and the more holy they are, the more ready
still they are to pay this tribute of their humble obsequiousness to
the will of their God, which is the supreme law, without all pleas
of their own inconveniences: but in this case, where shall we find
any such command? where the least signification of the divine
pleasure 1 Surely should he bid any of them glide down to the
dreadful regions of hell itself, he would not stick at the
condition; but as soon shall they find the Almighty's charge for the
one as for the other.
Secondly*,
they say, it is likely the souls of the dead saints are not in the
highest heaven, but in a middle place, better than this world, but
inferior to the Empyreal heaven, which is meant in the New Testament
by paradise.
Wherein, certainly, Mr. Archer
hath shot strangely wide, both for the name and the place. Here can
be no thought of the terrestrial paradise, as Epiphanius weakly
imagined, which doubtless was long since defaced by the deluge. That
the celestial paradise, then, should either be called or be a lower
place than the highest heaven, is no other than a gross misprision.
I appeal to the blessed apostle, who was rapt up thither: who tells
us, that the man he knew was caught up to the third heaven, 2
Cor. xii. 2; and straight, as describing paradise for some more
eminent part in that highest heaven, he adds, that he, the same man,
was caught into paradise, and heard unspeakable words, ver.
4: where, that we shall not need to imagine a double rapture of St.
Paul, as some of the fathers out of this place have done, it seems
clear that, contrary to this author's assertion, the paradise of the
New Testament is the highest and most glorious place of the Empyreal
heaven; which must certainly be hence evinced, unless we will grant,
either two several raptures of the apostle, or an unnecessary and
tautological repetition of one: for, having first said, / knew
such a one caught into the third heaven, he subjoins, And I
knew such a man, whether in the body or out of the body, I cannot
tell, God knoweth: how that he was caught into paradise, and heard
unspeakable words; so as his taking up into paradise must needs
be a farther advance of that his exta
1 Archer, p. 22. * Ibid. p.
»3.
tical rapture, the first rise
whereof was no lower than the third heaven. Add to this, that when
our Saviour said to the dying convert on the cross, This day thou
shalt be with me in paradise, he could intend no less than a
place of heavenly glory: the thief speaks of a kingdom, our Saviour
of a paradise: the kingdom that was spoken of was the paradise which
was promised. To this purpose is that which our learned Gregory
observes out of Irena?usb, who
describes the receipt, of just arid perfect men, to be a certain
paradise in the eastern part of the third heaven; professing to
receive that tradition from the disciples of the apostles. So as
this paradise, according to the best interpreters, is cal\ pars
nobilior et eminentior; "a more noble and eminent part of
heaven/' And if there may be any damage, then, or disadvantage in
the change of a place of more excellence for a meaner, in the change
of the company of blessed angels for the society of mortal men,
surely it lies strongly against this opinion, which fetcheth the
saints down from the fruition of an heavenly glory to the government
of the earth. But who told this author that the souls of the
departed saints are only Iv -npoQvpots, as some ancients have
expressed it? in some " outer porch" belonging to the court of
heaven, and not in the inner rooms of those glorious mansions? in a
place wherein they have full joy and perfect happiness, yet not
where Christ's body is? and that in this place they are kept till
this kingdom of Christ come? We are sure we hear our Saviour say,
Father, I will that they also, whom thou hast given me, be with me
where I am; that they may behold the glory which thou hast given me,
John xvii. 24: and in his last sacramental banquet with his
disciples, we hear him say, / will drink no more of this fruit of
the vine, till I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdom:
we are sure we hear the Chosen Vessel, who had viewed those heavenly
palaces, say, We know that if our earthly house of this
tabernacle were dissolved, we have a building of God, an house not
made with hands, eternal in the heavens, 2 Cor. v. 1: lo, in the
heavens, not beneath them; and that immediately upon the dissolution
of this earthly tabernacle, not three thousand years after it; and
more than so long it must be, by their rule, ere the apostles can be
admitted into heaven: a thousand six hundred years are already
passed, and yet the thousand years' reign is not begun: a thousand
years after that must pass ere the end of the last judgment,
b
Greg. Observat. Iiten. advera. Hseres. l. v. c. 5. [Notes and
Observations, Lond. 1650. p. 76.]
BP.
HALL, VOL. VIII. Z
which shall enter them into the
possession of their heaven. But a full confutation of any incident
passages is no part of my intention; otherwise, I should willingly
fall upon the discussion of those scriptures which are strained to
the defence of that assertion, whereof yet there would be the less
need, for that the argument holds strongly enough, even upon their
own concessions: for if that paradise, which they imagine to
themselves, be, though not the third heaven, yet a place of perfect
joy and happiness, certainly the exchange of it during those
thousands of years for so base and dungeon-like an habitation in
this lower world, must needs be greatly disadvantageous.
But if not in the highest
heaven, where will he think to place his paradise 1 Surely,
saith this author, in the element of fire.
A
strange soil wherein to plant a blissful paradise! But what if there
be no element of fire? Such tenets, surely, the schools afforded our
younger days. SomePatriciusc would
tell him, that if there be an excess of heat in those upper regions,
under the concave of the moon, yet it is neither fire nor elemental.
But if, upon some new principles, he shall make the substance of the
starry heaven (which we had wont to call quintessential) to be the
element of fire, I shall choose rather to wonder at that strange
philosophy than to wrangle about it; wishing that it were no more
unsafe to broach our own singular imaginations in these points of
divinity than in these harmless speculations of nature.
However it be, whether cither
of them may be the receptacle of the departed souls of the faithful
till Christ's next coming, it is too much curiosity to inquire, and
no less presumption to determine. Sure we are, and it is agreed on
all hands, that, immediately upon their freeing from this clog of
earth, they are in peace* and unspeakable happiness, whether
in a local or virtual heaven: neither need we doubt to say, that the
full complement of their glory shall be in that great day, when
their old consorts, their bodies, shall be joined with them in the
partnership of their consummate blessedness.
Section XXVI.
Eighthly, how ill is it
contrived to match such contrarieties in 8. Children of the the same
subject! The children of the saints, who wi wff
are the
free subjects of this kingdom, shall
be beyet still saints. gotten in sin, conceived and born in sin, and
yet be true saints; as if only gross actual sins, from which they
shall be restrained, were inconsistent with
holiness: Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean 1
saith Job, ch. xiv. 4. If, then, they be pretended to be true
saints, why are they not cleared from all sin whatsoever 1
unless we will bring in the justly-exploded distinction of sins
venial and mortal, sins besides, not against the law; and shall free
concupiscence from the taint of sin; and so shall in the new kingdom
find out sinning saints, or holy sinners. And how insufficiently is
it pleaded, that there can be no hypocrites in this kingdom; for
that, it being administered by the raised saints, they cannot
possibly pass undiscerned by so piercing eyes! as if those sharp
eyes of the raised saints could penetrate the bosoms of men, and
look into the heart, which the Maker of it hath locked up for his
own only search and intuition.
Sbction XXVII.
Ninthly, it suits not over well, that the subjects of this kingdom „
. shall not converse with God by ordinances, and vet
9. No use of » '«
ordinances, yet that they shall
have a full and perfect answer from prayers hearde.
Qqd
to
&ll
^eir praver8; since it cannot
be denied
that prayer is none of the
meanest ordinances of the Almighty. Tenthly, upon this first
resurrection of all saints at the next
10. Heaven dis- coming of
Christ, how hard and harsh a consequent peopled of all must it needs
seem, that heaven, or (as he will have
the ancient glo- . . .
rious inhabitants it) paradise,
shall be, for two thousand years at the for 2000 years. \easti
dispeopled of all their ancient and glorious inhabitants, the
souls of God's saints, which have departed from the beginning of the
world, to the very instant of our Saviour's return: all which are
for that time housed again with their raised bodies upon earth, and
there continued upon the employment of their kingly administration!
Eleventhly, how incongruous
doth it justly seem, that the souls of God's saints, after their
first dissolution, should be in so various, different, and unequal
condition, as that some of them should be ruling on earth, clothed
with their bodies; while others, which departed after Christ's
coming down, should, as new guests, be triumphing in heaven!
Twelfthly, how can it accord with that which the apostle hath taught
us concerning the last coming of Christ to judgment, them also
which sleep in Jesus will the Lord bring with him, 1 Thess. iv.
14, if the saints shall be found all on the earth before him, as
being raised by him at his second coming, to reign here below till
his return to the final judgment of the world?
c Page 29.
These and many other absurd
inferences may be brought, as necessarily following upon the
doctrine of this first resurrection and reign of all saints, if I
did not fear to cloy my reader with distasteful superfluities.
Section XXVIII.
But perhaps I may meet with
some of our millenarian brethren, The opinion of who, disclaiming
this more common opinion of the the first resur- raisins: and
reigning of all the saints. will choose
rectum of only , ° „ , .
., .. j i_
martyrs con- rather to adhere
to the conceit of Alstedius and ms filted-
complices, who appropriate this privilege of the first
resurrection and thousand
years' reign to martyrs onlyf; as the
first fruits unto God; as purchased by a particular prerogative from
among men. For which purpose, they think fit to interpret that i
Thess. iv. 14, those that sleep in Jesus, by a strained
construction of the preposition—" those that sleep for the sake 8 of
Jesus."
Wherein, certainly, they are
not well advised, and will find themselves strongly confuted out of
the very scope and context of the place. It was the apostle's drift
there to comfort his Thessalonians, and to mitigate their extreme
sorrow for the death of those which were dear unto them; whose
decease he terms a sleep. Can they think they grieved for the
parting only from their martyred friends 1 or did none but
they sleep? The word is first general and absolute, ere it be
restrained by any preposition; and, in the sequel. those which are
asleep are contradistinguished to those that are alive and remain
unto the coming of the Lord; so as all the faithful, which died
before, are those that are asleep in Jesus.
Neither can their
interpretation find any relief from Rev. xiv. 13, Blessed are
those dead which die in the Lord, Spc.; that is, as they take
it, "for the Lord:" the next words refel it; for they rest from
their labours, and their works follow them. Do none but martyrs
find rest from their labours in death? do none else find the happy
reward of their works?
And well may their opposers
say, We find not the four and twenty elders, which sat
clothed with white raiment, and with crowns of gold 071 their
heads, to have been martyrs; and yet we heard them say, Thou
hast made us unto our God kings and priests, and we shall reign upon
earth, Rev. iv. 4, v. 10.
Indeed, if there shall be any
reign of the saints on earth at all for those thousand years,
Alstedius is sure too straitlaced to restrain this honour to martyrs
only. How many thousands of saints have there been, that have been
no less holy, and won no less honour to God in their stations, than
those which have bled for him? What shall we say to Abraham, the
father of the faithful? to him that wrestled with God, and
prevailed? to the rest of the holy patriarchs? to Moses, the man of
God, that conversed so familiarly with the Almighty? to Elias, that
was rapt up to heaven? and to all the other holy prophets? to the
blessed apostles? to the laborious planters of the evangelical
churches amongst pagans? to those painful preachers of the gospel
which have willingly wasted themselves to give light unto others?
Shall we suppose that they shall lie still in the dust, while one
sudden stroke of an axe shall advance those other to the prevented
resurrection of a thousand years?
Besides, if he will needs be
literal, how much lower must the restriction yet fall! / saw,
saith St. John, the souls of them that were beheaded for the
witness of Jesus, and for the word of God; and which had not
worshipped the beast, nor his image; neither had received his mark
upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned
with Christ a thousand years.
For
how many thousands have suffered martyrdom for good causes before
the beast was bred, or his image, or his marks heard of; or before
Christ came in the flesh! Such was the righteous Abel, the
protomartyr of the world. Such were the fourscore and five
persons that wore a linen ephod, murdered by the command of
Saul'. Such was Zechariah, the son of Jehoiada, slain by the command
of Joashk. Such were those many
thousands of God's people, that were massacred under the tyranny of
Antiochus. Neither doubt I to say, that whosoever he be that suffers
for the testimony of a good conscience, because he dares not violate
any one of the moral laws of God, is as true a martyr, as he that
dies for the maintenance of any of the twelve articles of his creed.
Besides, our histories tell usl
of some very Arians and other heretics, that have yet given their
lives up to heathen persecutors for the name of Christ. Shall we say
that these men shall receive more privilege from God than the most
orthodox confessors, which kept their souls within their teeth; yet
suffered grievously, and lived and died more holily?
I I
Sam. xxii. 18. k 2 Chron. xxiv. it.
1 Socrat. Hist. Eccl. l. iv. c. [33,
ed. Hussey.]
Shortly, then, if we shall
count this preventive resurrection a special blessing of God, it
must needs be an injurious partiality in those, who shall make such
a difference of saints, as that the more holy shall, in the
retribution of the just God, carry away the lesser reward; and the
less holy shall, for one act of an instantany suffering, be crowned
with so great and long-lasting glory before them.
Howsoever it be taken, surely
that so much-urged text of i Thess. iv. 14 favoureth neither of
them: for when the apostle saith, Those that sleep in, or
for, Christ, shall rise first, he speaks of one and the same
resurrection, not of two resurrections, a thousand years asunder.
Neither is there any clause in the whole book of God that doth so
much as seem to countenance, no not to intimate, this double
resurrection, in the sense pretended; or this reign of either
martyrs or other saints upon earth: which in a verity of such
importance is without all example: for all the holy doctrines of
divine scripture do, as that father said aright, crvva\r]Oeutiv,
"con truth with" each other; making good both themselves and
their fellows; whereas this not only (if it could be true) stands
alone, but hath many sore brushes of contradiction, both of text and
reason, to discard it from our belief.
Section XXIX.
As
for that evasion of Alstedius, that the single expression of
Aistedius's eva- this supposed truth is no more derogation from sion
concern- the
undoubtcd certainty of it,
than that of the
ing this single _ »
expression of seventy weeks of
Daniel, which, though but once *^gTMlI^e0aTy
mentioned in scripture, yet is and ever hath been swered. received
as a most sure, comfortable, and undeniable
verity, it cannot serve his
turn in the case we have in hand. There is no less difference in the
comparison than in the time. The one, a thing past, and punctually
fulfilled; the other, in very pretence, future. The one, clearly
laid forth without any ambiguity in the relation, save only that
weeks of years, not of days, are plainly signified; the other, full
of doubtful construction. As well might he have instanced in many
hundred passages of scripture, especially in matter of history,
wherein the Holy Ghost contents himself with single and but light
touches of report, and yet challenging no less belief than upon a
thousand reduplications.
Far be it from him to entertain
so uncharitable thoughts of us, as if we durst not trust God on his
word, though but once spoken. We know him to be Amen; and that
repetitions add nothing to plain truths: but
all the question is here, not of words, but of sense; not of what is
said, but of what is meant: so as we have reason to expect and
require, that, when a strange doctrine is raised out of the
construction of a doubtful text, it should be showed to be seconded
by the accordant testimony of other scriptures, which upon this
matter lying now before us can never be effected.
Section XXX.
We are now fallen upon the last
part of our task, which is No necessity to show that we are not, by
any necessity of this from the text, fatf
casj, Upon
the admission of these strange
of admittrag
1 °
this strange tenets, of a
double resurrection of the body, and of
reign contend-
sucn a
re1gn
of tne saints upon earth as is preed
for. tended; since the words may well bear other more
commodious and safe
constructions, wherein our sober predecessors contented themselves
to rest.
For the terms here used are, if
we observe them, of much latitude. He saith, / saw the souls of
them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, Sfc., and they
lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. This is the first
resurrection.
1. We
know the souls are sometimes taken for the spirit that
animates us; sometimes for the whole person, so the protomartyr
tells us, Jacob brought down into Egypt threescore and fifteen
souls, Acts vii. 14.
2.
That were beheaded; though in a grammar sense it signifies the
time past; yet commonly, in a prophetical sense, it signifies the
future; it being the ordinary phrase of the prophets, by reason of
the infallible certainty of the events, to speak of things to come
as already past; the instances are obvious and infinite.
3.
The living and reigning with Christ is either in this life or
in heaven; present or future; in grace or in glory; in way of
government or of a blessed fruition.
4.
The thousand years, either punctually determinate or
indefinite.
5.
The first resurrection, either of the soul or body; either
the resurrection of the soul from sin and a dead state of
unregeneration, or the resurrection of the body from the grave; and
in the former construction, a resurrection either of a reformed
community or of particular persons.
All
these, then, well put together, cannot but afford us our choice of
orthodox and probable interpretations without any violence offered
to the sense.
Amongst the rest, I shall pitch
upon these two as the most clear and free from all just exception.
Section XXXI.
The
former, relating to the condition of God's faithful servants The
safe and here on earth after those bloody and general perstiuc«on^fnthe
secutions- Thus: "I saw upon the
restraint of text insisted on. Satan from that furious and universal
violence, which by the hands of those cruel emperors he had
exercised against the Church of Christ, such honour put upon his
faithful and constant confessors, during the time of Satan's
shutting up, as that the power was committed unto them of managing
the affairs of God's Church, and executing due censures upon the
offenders. And I saw those godly persons, which, in true zeal of
God's glory, either had suffered, or were ready to suffer and lay
down their lives for the testimony of Jesus Christ; and those which
conscionably refrained from and abhorred the errors and idolatries
of the times; those, I saw to enjoy a comfortable life and spiritual
reign with Christ, in a sanctified and gracious estate here on
earth, all the time of the thousand years of Satan's restraint. But
for the rest, which lay spiritually dead in their sins and impious
courses, they did not, either in that space or afterwards, at all
attain to this life of grace, and to the true knowledge and fruition
of God. Now this abandoning of the sinful corruptions of the times,
and attaining to the true knowledge and love of the saving truth of
God, and a conscionablo obedience thereto, is the first
resurrection. Blessed and holy is he that hath his part in this
spiritual resurrection; for on such a one the second death, which is
an eternal separation of the soul from the presence of God, shall
have no power," &c.
The other, relating to the
happy estato of the souls glorified in heaven, to this sense: "I saw
the souls of the blessed martyrs, after they were, by a violont
death, for bearing witness to the name of Christ, freed from the
calamities of this wretched life, received up to glory; and,
reigning in heaven with their glorious Redeemer in everlasting
happiness, even during those thousands of years wherein Satan was in
his fetters, and, after that, to all eternity."
If
either of these constructions may fitly explicate the text, and
fully suit with all other scriptures, to what purpose should we
ransack the grave, and rake in the ashes of an odious Cerinthus, or
an exploded Papias, for the long since condemned conceits of old and
hitherto forgotten millenarism (
I
might easily, if it would requite the cost of time, lay before my
reader the just exception that may be taken against divers of those
other expositions, and the opinions thereon grounded, which I
formerly specified; but I do willingly forbear them, as more worthy
of silence and neglect. I had rather spend my time and breath in
exhorting all good Christians to keep close to their old tenets, and
to beware of all either new devised or redivived errors of opinion,
whereof this last age of ours is deplorably fruitful.
Section XXXII. Among
the rest, let me beseech them to stick fast to their reAn exhorta-
ceived principles in these four points, which are in
totte "id pri£
cident to
the matter
that lies before us. ciples: and. First, that they fix not their
belief upon any
lieve any king- kingdom of
Christ our Saviour but spiritual and
dom of Christ heavenly. I am
sure no other can be enforced
but spiritual and" . . .
heavenly. upon them by the
text; for it is not said that Christ shall reign with them on earth,
but they shall reign with Christ; rather intimating, that they
should be fetched up to him, than that he should come down to them:
and besides, this reign is attributed to the souls, not to the
bodies of the martyred saints. If it be urged that this reign of
theirs is upon a resurrection from the dead, it is as easily
returned, that the resurrection intimated is no less spiritual than
the soul which it concerns: Awake, thou that sleepest, and stand
up from the dead, and Christ shall give thee light, Eph. v. 14,
saith the Spirit of God: lo, that sleep is death, and both that dead
sleep and the awaking out of it is purely spiritual. Neither,
indeed, is this personal and visibly monarchical reign of Christ
other than disagreeable to the heavenly condition of the Son of God
in the fulness of his glorification; which, certainly, if ever he
would have exercised, it should have been when he was here, like
unto us, a man amongst men, that so he might have ruled over
subjects suitable to himself; but now that his human body is in a
celestial and glorious estate, and his blessed Deity shining forth
in the full beams of resplendent majesty which mortal eyes are not
capable to behold, to bring him down from the highest heaven to take
the personal government of men, subject to sin and death, as
Alstedius yields them, seems to be extremely incongruous. And if we
would imagine a visible and personal monarchy, here must be all
things correspondent thereunto; the place, the form, the attendants,
the officers, the laws, the process, the rewards and punishments, in
an outward, bodily, and little other than
secular way; all which, how probable it may sound to Christian ears,
I leave to the judicious reader to judge.
Section XXXIII. Had
our blessed Saviour while he was here on earth, or his inspired
apostles after him, given us the least hint to1!wnlf'ofnany
of this his future monarchy, we should humbly have absolute free-
prostrated our souls to the belief and expectation of
dom from sra
r . , . , , .
or affliction it; but if men
will be raising such doctrines out here below.
Qf tneu,
private constructions of an enigmatical text capable of a more safe
and received sense, we must crave pardon to withhold our assent, and
to leave them to their own imaginations.
Secondly, that they do not, out
of this conceit of a personal and visible kingdom of Christ, flatter
themselves into an opinion of an absolute freedom from either sin or
bodily affliction here in this earthly life; since both these are
and ever will be the unavoidable companions of frail humanity, and
the miserable symptoms of our fleshly nature. It is a true word of
Eliphaz the Temanite: What is man, that he should be clean? and
he that is born of a woman, that he should be righteous? Job xv.
14. Certainly, we must cease to be men when we begin to be sinless.
Sin, though it be not of the essence of our nature, as some have
erroneously thought, yet it is a proper and inseparable adjunct
thereof, which we cannot hope to be quit of by the most perfect
regeneration. And as for affliction, he hath told us that cannot
deceive us, even Truth itself, In the world you shall have
tribulation, Johnxvi. 33; and his blessed apostles, to the same
purpose, That through many tribulations we must enter into the
kingdom of heaven, Acts xiv. 22. And if Alstedius shall hope to
avoid the blow by shifting his foot, and referring the words to the
present condition of the persecuted disciples, which yet should
afterwards be interchanged with vicissitudes of calm and peaceable
times, he might well have considered, that this life of ours is
necessarily obnoxious to many other afflictions beside violent
persecutions, and might have paralleled that sentence with the
experimental observation of the great pattern of patience, Man
that is born of a woman is of a few dags, and fill of trouble,
Job xiv. 1. Neither indeed can this conceit of theirs stand with
that old and never contracted distinction of the Church militant and
triumphant: for if this Church of Christ upon earth shall after the
next return of him be freed both from Satan, who is now chained up,
and from all whatsoever afflictions, with
what warfare shall we say it is exercised for the space of a whole
iooo years? what adversary can it meet with for confliction? And if
Alstedius shall tell us, that in this mean while the living saints,
though not the raised, are still combated inwardly in their breasts
with their rebelling corruptions, we send Mr. Archer to enter the
lists with him; who offers to make good upon him, that those very
saints whom our returning Saviour shall find alive are both in
themselves and in their children, in all succeeding generations,
freed from all the power of sin; so as, though they have an original
corruption still within them, yet it shall never break forth to the
prejudice of their souls. So as by this rule there should be no
church in the world till towards the end of that thousand years, but
triumphant; which surely a man had need of a strong faith to
believe.
Section XXXIV.
Thirdly, that they do not
entertain the thought or expectation Thirdly, to of any other future
coming of their Saviour, but cora1ngnof
0thCT tnat
oue on'y
of his return to the final judgment Christ but that
of the world. Surely the blessed
apostle knew of judgment. no other, when he charged Timothy
before God and the Lord Jesus, who shall judge the quick and the
dead at his appearance, to preach the word, 2 Tim.
iv.1,2: when he prayed for his Thessalonians, that God would
stablish their hearts unblamable in holiness, at the coming
of the Lord Jesus Christ with all his saints, 1 Thess. iii. 13.
Lo, if there should bo imagined a third coming of Christ, we cannot
say that he comes with all his saints; since the greatest
part of them, according to this tenet, are already upon earth before
him, and do rather stay for him below, than come from above with
him. And, indeed, wherefore should it be imagined that the Lord
Jesus should make this middle descent from heaven to earth? Great
actions must have answerable motives: what necessity or use can they
frame to themselves of this wonderful appearance? Is it to receive
his kingdom? He hath it already: Thou hast put all things in
subjection under his feet, saith the apostle, Heb. ii. 8:
already hath God highly exalted him, and given him a name which
is above all names: that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow,
of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the
earth, Phil. ii. 9,10. Is it to settle the government of that
his better reformed Church? It is done already: He that descended
is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens, that he
might fll all things. And he gave some, to be apostles; some,
prophets; some, evangelists; and some,
pastors and teachers; to what purpose? For the perfecting of
the saints, fyc., for the edifying of the body of Christ, Ephes.
iv. 10,11,12. And how long? Till we all come in the unity of the
faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man,
unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ, ver.
13. Is it to subdue and destroy his enemies? Hath he not infinite
power in his hand to effect that without a bodily descent? When he
destroyed the first world of wicked men, did he descend from heaven
to do it? So then we may, with all Christian assurance, rest upon
the word of his holy apostle Peter, that the heavens must receive
him until the restit u tion of all things, Acts iii. 21:
which is that of the general resurrection, as we may see by
comparing of St. Peter with St. Paul, Rom. viii. 23, termed by our
Saviour, the day of our redemption: till when (which cannot
be long) we have no ground to expect our Saviour's return.
Section XXXV.
Fourthly, that we do neither, out of a credulous security, put Not
to put the the day of the last judgment far off from us, nor,
judgment far"8*
out of a
misgrounded presumption, pass our puncfrom
Ub: nor tual
predeterminations of it.
to dctemrine^ ^n
Dotn which extremes, these last times
have been the time of it. too fault-worthy. The time was, when the
apostle was fain to beat off his Thessalonians from the expectation
of the then instant appearing of Christ to judgment; now we have
more need, after sixteen hundred years' continuance, to persuade our
people of the approach of this great day. The}' did then believe
that Christ was at the door; now we are hardly induced to believe
that he is upon the way to that dreadful judicature. Surely, this
operation hath this millenary doctrine had upon the hearts of men,
that, though they are thereupon apt to expect an appropinquation of
their Saviour for their happy advantage, yet they resolutely put off
the thought of his coming to the general judgment of the world for
many generations. A man hath a good estate in his farm for almost an
hundred years; another, that is about to purchase the inheritance in
reversion after so long a term, is told it were better to spare that
cost, since in all likelihood the world would ere then be at an end:
he answers, "Tush! no, the thousand years are not yet entered
wherein the saints shall reign upon earth before that day." In which
yet this opinionist can be no other than grossly overseen. For is he
a saint, or is he none? if none, even the next coming of Christ
destroys him, and mars his purchase: if a saint, though he make no
purchase now, he shall then (according to their doctrine) live in
all fulness of riches and earthly contentment. But what if that
thousand years' reign be to be
accomplished in heaven, not in earth, as some construe it? or if on
earth, what if it be already accomplished, as others? Where is then
the confidence of this delay? Certainly, notwithstanding this
unhappily raised suggestion, nothing appears why we should not make
full account that the world is near to its last period; and that our
Lord Jesus is at hand for his final judgment. For if, in the time of
the blessed apostles, it was justly computed to be the last hour,
needs must it now be drawing towards the last minute: neither have
we any reason to say, with the evil servant in the gospel, the
Lord defers his coming.
It
may be a question, whether it may be more out of boldness, to
maintain that dilatory assertion of the last judgment which hath
passed the pens of Alphonsus, Conradus, Cotterius, and others, or
the confident and punctual assignation of the time of those
universal sessions determined by Alstedius, Archer, and others of
that way. Who can but be startled at those lines of Mr. Archer? -"
Now," saith hem, " having found out
when Christ's kingdom, or the thousand years, shall begin, it is
easy to guess when the time of the last and general judgment and the
world's end shall be." Thus he. Truly, the evidence is much alike of
both: for when shall that
Ioco years' reign begin?
"About the year of our Lord 1700," saith he, following the steps of
Alstedius; who, upon the same ground, casts it upon the year 1694:
and both of them ground the epochas of their calculation upon that
forementioned place of Dan. xii. 11,12: From the time that the
daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that
maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred
and ninety days. Blessed is he that waiteth, and cometh to the
thousand three hundred and five and thirty days: where the days,
as I formerly intimated, are taken to stand for years; and, withal,
it is supposed that the 1335 years are, in order of time, to take
their original after the expiration of the 1290 years; and both of
them to take their rise from the termination of the seventy weeks,
viz. anno 169. All which put together make up the number of 2694,
which is the utmost period of the icoo years' reign of the saints:
from which, therefore, if we deduce the said thousand, there must
n, Personal Reign,
p. 5o.
remain 1694, the initium regni
of the Lord of glory here upon earth. But if either the taking
away of the daily sacrifice and the desolatory abomination be not
understood in that place of the act and army of the Romans; or the
days there mentioned be not intended to stand for so many years, as
being only to signify the short time of Antiochus's cruel persecution;
or, lastly, if those two several numbers were not meant to be
successive one to the other in the whole computation of them, (which
learned Calvin plainly censures for a vain and groundless conceit,)
all this aim and labour is lost; and we are yet to seek where to pitch
the account either for beginning or termination. Shortly, what heed is
to be given to this reckoning appears in that first parcel of it which
concerns the total conversion of the Jews; which Mr. Archer, with the
like confidence, places upon 1650, now entered upon by our almanacks,
or at the farthest 1656: wherein we see his prognostication fails him,
and his prediction is sufficiently checked by the event. No otherwise
than Mr. Brightman's: by whose account the Turkish tyranny should have
lasted but seven years after he wrote his "
Revelation;" whereas now near forty years are since passed, and
that empire holds up still in too much vigour, without any appearance
of diminution.
What should I need to show how
others, both of our countrymen and foreigners, who thought themselves
wiser than their fellows, have been shamefully baffled in their
fore-determining of the last day of the world; which themselves have
been suffered to overlive 1 It will well become modest
Christians to rest in revealed truths; and leave the unlocking of the
secret cabinets of the Almighty to the only key of his divine wisdom
and omniscience: as remembering the words of our Saviour; Of that
day and hour knoweth no man; no, not the angels of heaven.
Let it
be our care to be ever in a perpetual posture of readiness for that
awful and glorious coming of our Lord and Saviour, whensoever it shall
be; and to see that our accounts be set right for that great audit: so
shall we meet our returning Master with a comfortable and happy
assurance; and hear from him that blessed Euge, Well done, good and
faithful servant, enter into thy Master's joy.
BIOGRAPHY
Early
life
He was born at Bristow Park, near Ashby-de-la-Zouch, Leicestershire.
Joseph Hall came of a large family, being one of twelve children born
to John Hall, agent in Ashby-de-la-Zouch for Henry Hastings, 3rd Earl
of Huntingdon. Hall's mother, Winifred Bambridge, was a Calvinist
close to Anthony Gilby.[2] Her son later compared her to St Monica:
"What day did she pass without a large task of private devotion?
whence she would still come forth, with a countenance of undissembled
mortification. Never any lips have read to me such feeling lectures of
piety; neither have I known any soul that more accurately practised
them than her own."
Joseph Hall received his early education at the local Ashby Grammar
School, founded by his father's patron the Earl, and was later sent
(1589) to Emmanuel College, Cambridge,[3] where Anthony Gilby's son
Nathaniel was a Fellow[4] and advocated this course.[5] The college
was Puritan in tone, and Hall was undoubtedly under Calvinist
influence in his youth. After some early setbacks (his father found it
difficult to pay for a university education and nearly recalled him
after the first two years), Hall's academic career was a great
success. He was chosen for two years in succession to read the public
lecture on rhetoric in the schools and in 1595 became fellow of his
college.
Priest
Having taken holy orders, Hall was offered the mastership of
Blundell's School, Tiverton, but he refused it in favour of the living
of Hawstead, Suffolk, to which he was presented (1601) by Sir Robert
Drury. The appointment was not wholly satisfactory: in his parish Hall
had an opponent in a Mr Lilly, whom he describes as a "witty and bold
atheist", he had to find money to make his house habitable, and he
felt that his patron Sir Robert underpaid him. Nevertheless in 1603,
he married Elizabeth Wynniff of Brettenham, Suffolk.
In 1605, Hall travelled abroad for the first time when he accompanied
Sir Edmund Bacon on an embassy to Spa, with the special aim, he says,
of acquainting himself with the state and practice of the Romish
Church. At Brussels, he disputed at the Jesuit college on the
authentic character of modern miracles, until his patron at length
asked him to stop.
His devotional writings had attracted the notice of Henry, Prince of
Wales, who made him one of his chaplains (1608). Hall preached
officially on the tenth anniversary of King James's accession in 1613,
with an assessment in An Holy Panegyrick of the Church of England
flattering to the king.[6]
In 1612, Edward Denny gave him the curacy of Waltham-Holy-Cross,
Essex, and, in the same year, he received the degree of D.D.. Later he
received the prebend of Willenhall in the collegiate church of
Wolverhampton, and, in 1616, he accompanied James Hay, Lord Doncaster
to France, where he was sent to congratulate Louis XIII on his
marriage, but Hall was compelled by illness to return. In his absence,
the king nominated him Dean of Worcester, and, in 1617, he accompanied
James to Scotland, where he defended the Five Articles of Perth, five
points of ceremonial which the king desired to impose upon the
Scots.[7]
In the next year he was chosen as one of the English deputies at the
Synod of Dort. But he fell ill, and was replaced by Thomas Goad.[8] At
the time (1621-2) when Marco Antonio de Dominis announced his
intention to return to Rome, after a stay in England, Hall wrote to
try to dissuade him, without success. In a long-unpublished reply
(printed 1666) De Dominis justified himself in a comprehensive
statement of his mission against schism and its limited results,
hampered by Dort and a lack of freedom under James I.[9]
Bishop
In a sermon Columba Noæ of February 1624 (1623 O.S.) to Convocation,
he gave a list or personal panorama of leading theologians of the
Church of England.[10] In the same year he also refused the see of
Gloucester: at the time English delegates to Dort were receiving
preferment, since King James approved of the outcome. Hall was then
involved as a mediator, taking an active part in the Arminian and
Calvinist controversy in the English church, and trying to get other
clergy to accept Dort. In 1627, he became Bishop of Exeter.[11]
In spite of his Calvinistic opinions, he maintained that to
acknowledge the errors which had arisen in the Catholic Church did not
necessarily imply disbelief in her catholicity, and that the Church of
England having repudiated these errors should not deny the claims of
the Roman Catholic Church on that account. This view commended itself
to Charles I and his episcopal advisers; even if Hall, with John
Davenant and Thomas Morton, was considered a likely die-hard by
Richard Montagu if it ever came to reunification with the Catholic
Church.[12] At the same time, Archbishop Laud sent spies into Hall's
diocese to report on the Calvinistic tendencies of the bishop and his
lenience to the Puritan and low church clergy. Hall gradually took up
an anti-Laudian, but also anti-Presbyterian position, while remaining
a Protestant eirenicist in co-operation with John Dury and concerned
with continental Europe.[13][14][15]
In 1641 Hall was translated to the See of Norwich, and in the same
year sat on the Lords' Committee on religion. On December 30, he was,
with other bishops, brought before the bar of the House of Lords to
answer a charge of high treason of which the Commons had voted them
guilty. They were finally convicted of an offence against the Statute
of Praemunire, and condemned to forfeit their estates, receiving a
small maintenance from the parliament. They were immured in the Tower
from New Year to Whitsuntide, when they were released on finding bail.
Retirement
On his release, Hall proceeded to his new diocese at Norwich, the
revenues of which he seems for a time to have received, but in 1643,
when the property of the "malignants" was sequestrated, Hall was
mentioned by name. Mrs Hall had difficulty in securing a fifth of the
maintenance (£400) assigned to the bishop by the parliament; they were
eventually ejected from the palace, and the cathedral was dismantled.
Hall describes its desecration in Hard Measure:
“ Lord, what work was here! what clattering of glasses and beating
down of walls! what tearing up of monuments! what pulling down of
seats! what wrestling down of irons and brass from the windows and
walls... ”
He goes on to describe vividly the triumphal procession of the puritan
iconoclasts as they carried vestments, service books and singing books
to be burned in the nearby market place, while soldiers lounged in the
despoiled cathedral drinking and smoking their pipes.
The Dolphin Inn, Norwich, in the building where Bishop Hall had his
palace from 1643 to 1647.
Hall retired to the village of Heigham, near Norwich, where he spent
his last thirteen years preaching and writing until he was first
forbidden by man, and at last disabled by God. He bore his many
troubles and the additional burden of much bodily suffering with
sweetness and patience, dying on 8 September 1656. In his old age,
Hall was attended upon by the doctor Thomas Browne, who wrote of him:
“ A person of singular humility, patience and piety: his own works are
the best monument, and character of himself, which was also very
lively drawn in his excellent funeral sermon preached by my learned
and faithful friend Mr. John Whitefoot, Rector of Heigham.[16] ”
Works
He contributed to several distinct literary areas: satirical verse as
a young man; polemical writing, particularly in defending episcopacy;
and devotional writings, including contemplations carrying a political
slant. He was influenced by Lipsian neostoicism.[17] The anonymous
Mundus alter et idem is a satirical utopian fantasy, not denied by him
in strong terms at any point.
Satire and poetry
During his residence at Cambridge he wrote his Virgidemiarum
(1597),'[18] satires in English written after Latin models. The claim
he put forward in the prologue to be the earliest English satirist[19]
offended John Marston, who attacked him in satires published in 1598.
In the declining years of the reign of Elizabeth I there was much
satirical literature, and it was felt was to be an attack on
established institutions. John Whitgift, the archbishop of Canterbury,
ordered that Hall's satires, along with works of Thomas Nashe, John
Marston, Christopher Marlowe, Sir John Davies and others should be
burnt, on the ground of licentiousness; but shortly afterwards Hall's
book was ordered to be "staied at the press," which may be interpreted
as reprieved.[20]
Virgidemiarum was followed by an amended edition in 1598, and in the
same year by Virgidemiarum. The three last bookes. Of byting Satyres
(reprinted 1599). Not in fact the earliest English satirist, Hall
wrote in smooth heroic couplets. In the first book of his satires (Poeticall),
he attacks the writers whose verses were devoted to licentious
subjects, the bombast of Tamburlaine and tragedies built on similar
lines, the laments of the ghosts of the Mirror for Magistrates, the
metrical eccentricities of Gabriel Harvey and Richard Stanyhurst, the
extravagances of the sonneteers, and the sacred poets (Southwell is
aimed at in "Now good St Peter weeps pure Helicon, And both the Mary's
make a music moan"). In Book II Satire 6 occurs a description of the
trencher-chaplain, who is tutor and hanger-on in a country manor.
Among his other satirical portraits is that of the famished gallant,
the guest of "Duke Humfray." Book VI consists of one long satire on
vices and follies dealt with in the earlier books.
Hall's earliest published verse appeared in a collection of elegies on
the death of Dr. William Whitaker, to which he contributed the only
English poem (1596). A line in Marston's Pigmalion's Image (1598)
indicates that Hall wrote pastoral poems, but none of these have
survived.[21] He also wrote:
* The King's Prophecie; or Weeping Joy (1603), a gratulatory poem on
the accession of James I
* Epistles, both the first and second volumes of which appeared in
1608 and a third in 1611
* Characters of Virtues and Vices (1608), versified by Nahum Tate
(1691)
* Solomon's Divine Arts (1609)
Hall gave up verse satires and lighter forms of literature when he was
ordained a minister in the Church of England.
Mundus alter et idem
Hall wrote, according to current scholarly consensus, the dystopian
Mundus alter et idem sive Terra Australis antehac semper incognita;
Longis itineribus peregrini Academici nuperrime illustrata (1605? and
1607), by "Mercurius Britannicus." Mundus alter is an excuse for a
satirical description of London, with some criticism of the Catholic
church, and is said to have furnished Jonathan Swift with hints for
Gulliver's Travels. It is classified as a Menippean satire, and was
almost contemporary with another such satire by John Barclay,
Euphormionis Satyricon, with which it shares the features of being
written in Latin (Hall generally wrote in English), and a concern for
religious commentary.[22]
The narrator takes a voyage in the ship Fantasia, in the southern
seas, visiting the lands of Crapulia, Viraginia, Moronia and Lavernia
(populated by gluttons, nags, fools and thieves respectively). Moronia
parodies Catholic customs; in its province Variana is found an antique
coin parodying Justus Lipsius, a target for Hall's satire ad hominem
(here the personal attack goes beyond the Menippean model).[23]
Map from Mundus alter et idem.
Hall wrote it for private circulation, and its publication was not
intended by him.[24] The book was published at the hands of William
Knight, who wrote a Latin preface, he being only tentatively
identified by scholars (there are several candidate clergymen of that
name, the one with dates (c.1573–1617?) being singled out).[25] It was
reprinted in 1643, with Civitas Solis by Tommaso Campanella, and New
Atlantis by Francis Bacon.[26] It was not clearly ascribed to Hall by
name until 1674, when Thomas Hyde, the librarian of the Bodleian,
identified "Mercurius Britannicus" with Joseph Hall, as is now
accepted.[27] On the other hand Hall's authorship was an open secret,
and in 1642 John Milton used it to attack Hall (during the Smectymnuus
controversy) by employing the argument that Utopia and New Atlantis
had a constructive approach lacking in Mundus Alter.[28]
The Mundus alter was translated into English by John Healey (1608-9)
as The Discovery of a New World or A Description of the South Indies
by an English Mercury. This was a free and necessarily unauthorised
translation, and involved Hall in controversy. Andrea McCrea describes
Hall's interactions with Robert Dallington, and then Healey, against
the background of a few years of the pace-setting culture of the court
of Henry Frederick, Prince of Wales. Dallington advocated travel,
indeed the Grand Tour, while Hall was minatory about its effects;
Dallington wrote aphorisms following Lipsius and Guicciardini, while
Hall had moved away from the Tacitist strand in humanist thought to
the more conservative Senecan tendency with which he was permanently
to be associated. Healey embroidered political details into the Mundus
alter translation, and outed Hall as author at least as far as his
initials, the emphasis on politics again being a Tacitist one. Healey
had noble patronage, and Hall's position with respect to the princely
court culture was revealed as close that of the king, placing him as
an outsider rather than in the new group of movers and shakers.[29] On
the death of Prince Henry, his patron, Hall did preach the funeral
sermon to his household.[21]
Controversy
Hall's initial work of religious controversy was against Protestant
separatists. In 1608 he had written a letter of remonstrance to John
Robinson and John Smyth. Robinson, who had been a beneficed clergyman
near Yarmouth, had replied in An Answer to a Censorious Epistle; and
uHall published (1610) A Common Apology against the Brownists, a
lengthy treatise answering Robinson paragraph by paragraph. It set a
style, tight but rich using animadversion, for Hall's theological
writings. Hall criticised Robinson, the future pastor of the Mayflower
congregation, alongside Richard Bernard and John Murton.[21][30]
He did his best in his Via media, The Way of Peace (1619), to persuade
the two parties (Calvinist and Arminian) to accept a compromise. His
later defence of the English Church, and episcopacy as Biblical,
entitled Episcopacy by Divine Right (1640), was twice revised at
Laud's dictation.
Canterbury cathedral.jpg Anglicanism portal
This was followed by An Humble Remonstrance to the High Court of
Parliament (1640 and 1641), an eloquent and forceful defence of his
order, which produced a retort from the syndicate of Puritan divines,
who wrote under the name of Smectymnuus. This was followed by a long
controversy to which John Milton contributed five pamphlets,
virulently attacking Hall and his early satires.
|